Phenotypic tolerance for rDNA copy number variation within the natural range of C. elegans.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011759
Ashley N Hall, Elizabeth A Morton, Rebecca Walters, Josh T Cuperus, Christine Queitsch
{"title":"Phenotypic tolerance for rDNA copy number variation within the natural range of C. elegans.","authors":"Ashley N Hall, Elizabeth A Morton, Rebecca Walters, Josh T Cuperus, Christine Queitsch","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The genes for ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are encoded by ribosomal DNA (rDNA), whose structure is notable for being present in arrays of tens to thousands of tandemly repeated copies in eukaryotic genomes. The exact number of rDNA copies per genome is highly variable within a species, with differences between individuals measuring in potentially hundreds of copies and megabases of DNA. The extent to which natural variation in rDNA copy number impacts whole-organism phenotypes such as fitness and lifespan is poorly understood, in part due to difficulties in manipulating such large and repetitive tracts of DNA even in model organisms. Here, we used the natural resource of copy number variation in C. elegans wild isolates to generate new tools and investigated the phenotypic consequences of this variation. Specifically, we generated a panel of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) using a laboratory strain derivative with ~130 haploid rDNA copies and a wild isolate with ~417 haploid rDNA copies, one of the highest validated C. elegans rDNA copy number arrays. We find that rDNA copy number is stable in the RILs, rejecting prior hypotheses that predicted copy number instability and copy number reversion. To isolate effects of rDNA copy number on phenotype, we produced a series of near isogenic lines (NILs) with rDNA copy numbers representing the high and low end of the rDNA copy number spectrum in C. elegans wild isolates. We find no correlation between rDNA copy number and phenotypes of rRNA abundance, competitive fitness, early life fertility, lifespan, or global transcriptome under standard laboratory conditions. These findings demonstrate a remarkable ability of C. elegans to tolerate substantial variation in a locus critical to fundamental cell function. Our study provides strain resources for future investigations into the boundaries of this tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"21 7","pages":"e1011759"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The genes for ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are encoded by ribosomal DNA (rDNA), whose structure is notable for being present in arrays of tens to thousands of tandemly repeated copies in eukaryotic genomes. The exact number of rDNA copies per genome is highly variable within a species, with differences between individuals measuring in potentially hundreds of copies and megabases of DNA. The extent to which natural variation in rDNA copy number impacts whole-organism phenotypes such as fitness and lifespan is poorly understood, in part due to difficulties in manipulating such large and repetitive tracts of DNA even in model organisms. Here, we used the natural resource of copy number variation in C. elegans wild isolates to generate new tools and investigated the phenotypic consequences of this variation. Specifically, we generated a panel of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) using a laboratory strain derivative with ~130 haploid rDNA copies and a wild isolate with ~417 haploid rDNA copies, one of the highest validated C. elegans rDNA copy number arrays. We find that rDNA copy number is stable in the RILs, rejecting prior hypotheses that predicted copy number instability and copy number reversion. To isolate effects of rDNA copy number on phenotype, we produced a series of near isogenic lines (NILs) with rDNA copy numbers representing the high and low end of the rDNA copy number spectrum in C. elegans wild isolates. We find no correlation between rDNA copy number and phenotypes of rRNA abundance, competitive fitness, early life fertility, lifespan, or global transcriptome under standard laboratory conditions. These findings demonstrate a remarkable ability of C. elegans to tolerate substantial variation in a locus critical to fundamental cell function. Our study provides strain resources for future investigations into the boundaries of this tolerance.

秀丽隐杆线虫自然范围内rDNA拷贝数变异的表型耐受性。
核糖体RNA (rRNA)的基因是由核糖体DNA (rDNA)编码的,其结构在真核生物基因组中以数万到数千个串联重复拷贝的形式存在。每个基因组的rDNA拷贝的确切数量在一个物种内是高度可变的,个体之间的差异可能以数百个拷贝和百万碱基的DNA来衡量。rDNA拷贝数的自然变异在多大程度上影响了整个生物体的表型,如适应性和寿命,这在一定程度上是由于即使在模式生物中也很难操纵如此大且重复的DNA束。在此,我们利用秀丽隐杆线虫野生分离株拷贝数变异的自然资源来产生新的工具,并研究这种变异的表型后果。具体来说,我们使用具有约130个单倍体rDNA拷贝的实验室菌株衍生物和具有约417个单倍体rDNA拷贝的野生分离株(这是最有效的线虫rDNA拷贝数阵列之一)生成了一组重组自交系(RILs)。我们发现rDNA拷贝数在RILs中是稳定的,拒绝了先前预测拷贝数不稳定和拷贝数逆转的假设。为了分离rDNA拷贝数对表型的影响,我们制作了一系列近等基因系(NILs),其中rDNA拷贝数代表了秀丽隐杆线虫野生分离株rDNA拷贝数谱的高端和低端。在标准实验室条件下,我们发现rDNA拷贝数与rRNA丰度、竞争适应性、早期生育能力、寿命或整体转录组之间没有相关性。这些发现表明秀丽隐杆线虫在一个对基本细胞功能至关重要的位点上具有显著的耐受能力。我们的研究为未来研究这种耐受性的边界提供了应变资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信