Critical actions for embedding research evidence into practice: how to get the most out of your implementation scientist.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carolyn Mazariego, Hossai Gul, Shuang Liang, Angela Kelly-Hanku, Bernadette Brady, Sabine Allida, Rachel Baffsky, Gemma McErlean, Carmen Crespo, Michael Hodgins, Lauren Christie, David Peiris, Deborah Debono, Freya MacMillan, Caleb Ferguson, Nicole Heneka, Sarah G Kennedy, Hueiming Liu, April Morrow, Guillaume Fontaine, Merran Findlay, Sandy Middleton, David Lim, Nicola Straiton, Natalie Taylor
{"title":"Critical actions for embedding research evidence into practice: how to get the most out of your implementation scientist.","authors":"Carolyn Mazariego, Hossai Gul, Shuang Liang, Angela Kelly-Hanku, Bernadette Brady, Sabine Allida, Rachel Baffsky, Gemma McErlean, Carmen Crespo, Michael Hodgins, Lauren Christie, David Peiris, Deborah Debono, Freya MacMillan, Caleb Ferguson, Nicole Heneka, Sarah G Kennedy, Hueiming Liu, April Morrow, Guillaume Fontaine, Merran Findlay, Sandy Middleton, David Lim, Nicola Straiton, Natalie Taylor","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Implementation science has been gaining traction over the last decade to support health care systems in adopting and sustaining evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies. Given the inherent complexity of implementation research and practice, and their associated methodologies, implementation scientists play a central role in translating research into practice. However, many health care system stakeholders often struggle to understand how best to collaborate with implementation scientists. This commentary discusses the significant benefits of such collaboration, outlining ten critical actions drawn from the collective experience of 25 implementation scientists with over 173 years of combined expertise. This project was conducted under the SPHERE Implementation Science Platform, as part of the Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE).The ten recommendations for working with an implementation scientist to optimize implementation efforts include the following: (1) involve implementation scientists early during intervention design, (2) recognize the unique nature and value of implementation science data, (3) integrate implementation assessments into the research plan, (4) foster collaborative partnerships inclusive of implementation science, (5) differentiate between factors affecting implementation and wider constraints, (6) work with implementation scientists to address implementation challenges, (7) prioritize implementation scale and sustainment, (8) embrace that implementation requires continuous learning and adaptation, (9) promote knowledge exchange between implementation science and subject matter experts, and (10) focus on capability- and capacity-building for implementation within the system. By following these recommendations, researchers, clinicians, decision-makers, and implementation scientists can foster impactful collaborations that enhance the translation of research into clinical practice and improve the quality of health care delivery.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A374.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Implementation science has been gaining traction over the last decade to support health care systems in adopting and sustaining evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies. Given the inherent complexity of implementation research and practice, and their associated methodologies, implementation scientists play a central role in translating research into practice. However, many health care system stakeholders often struggle to understand how best to collaborate with implementation scientists. This commentary discusses the significant benefits of such collaboration, outlining ten critical actions drawn from the collective experience of 25 implementation scientists with over 173 years of combined expertise. This project was conducted under the SPHERE Implementation Science Platform, as part of the Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE).The ten recommendations for working with an implementation scientist to optimize implementation efforts include the following: (1) involve implementation scientists early during intervention design, (2) recognize the unique nature and value of implementation science data, (3) integrate implementation assessments into the research plan, (4) foster collaborative partnerships inclusive of implementation science, (5) differentiate between factors affecting implementation and wider constraints, (6) work with implementation scientists to address implementation challenges, (7) prioritize implementation scale and sustainment, (8) embrace that implementation requires continuous learning and adaptation, (9) promote knowledge exchange between implementation science and subject matter experts, and (10) focus on capability- and capacity-building for implementation within the system. By following these recommendations, researchers, clinicians, decision-makers, and implementation scientists can foster impactful collaborations that enhance the translation of research into clinical practice and improve the quality of health care delivery.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A374.

将研究证据嵌入实践的关键行动:如何最大限度地利用你的实施科学家。
摘要:在过去的十年中,实施科学已经获得了牵引力,以支持卫生保健系统采用和维持循证干预措施,计划和政策。鉴于实施研究和实践及其相关方法的内在复杂性,实施科学家在将研究转化为实践方面发挥着核心作用。然而,许多卫生保健系统的利益相关者往往难以理解如何最好地与实施科学家合作。本评论讨论了这种合作的重大好处,概述了25位拥有超过173年综合专业知识的实施科学家从集体经验中得出的10项关键行动。该项目是在悉尼卫生、教育、研究和企业伙伴关系框架下实施的科学平台下开展的。与实施科学家合作以优化实施工作的十条建议包括:(1)在干预设计早期让实施科学家参与进来;(2)认识到实施科学数据的独特性和价值;(3)将实施评估纳入研究计划;(4)促进包括实施科学在内的合作伙伴关系;(5)区分影响实施的因素和更广泛的限制因素;(6)与实施科学家合作应对实施挑战;(7)优先考虑实施规模和可持续性。(8)接受实施需要持续的学习和适应,(9)促进实施科学和主题专家之间的知识交流,(10)关注系统内实施的能力和能力建设。通过遵循这些建议,研究人员、临床医生、决策者和实施科学家可以促进有影响力的合作,从而加强将研究成果转化为临床实践,并提高卫生保健服务的质量。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A374。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信