Spatial metaphors of time elicit more temporal gestures in second language.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emir Akbuğa, Tilbe Göksun
{"title":"Spatial metaphors of time elicit more temporal gestures in second language.","authors":"Emir Akbuğa, Tilbe Göksun","doi":"10.1007/s10339-025-01285-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We use space to think and talk about time. Our hand gestures reflect how we conceptualize time. This study examines the processing differences between L1-Turkish and L2-English spatial metaphors of time, looking at hand gestures and comparing them with literal spatial statements. We asked our participants to explain literal and metaphorical sentences and coded their gestures. Participants also rated the conventionality of sentences based on their clarity. Individuals produced more gestures for L1 literal and L2 metaphorical sentences. Higher L2 proficiency was related to fewer overall gesture use in L2. Participants produced more temporal gestures while explaining L2 than L1 metaphors. L2 metaphors elicited more two-handed gestures than L1 metaphors. Individuals used the lateral and sagittal axes equally frequently while producing temporal gestures. Last, beat gestures followed the direction of metaphors in speech. These findings suggest that spatial metaphors of time are processed differently in L1 and L2. The findings pave the way for potential research that might compare such metaphors in first and second language in terms of gesture production.</p>","PeriodicalId":47638,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Processing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Processing","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-025-01285-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use space to think and talk about time. Our hand gestures reflect how we conceptualize time. This study examines the processing differences between L1-Turkish and L2-English spatial metaphors of time, looking at hand gestures and comparing them with literal spatial statements. We asked our participants to explain literal and metaphorical sentences and coded their gestures. Participants also rated the conventionality of sentences based on their clarity. Individuals produced more gestures for L1 literal and L2 metaphorical sentences. Higher L2 proficiency was related to fewer overall gesture use in L2. Participants produced more temporal gestures while explaining L2 than L1 metaphors. L2 metaphors elicited more two-handed gestures than L1 metaphors. Individuals used the lateral and sagittal axes equally frequently while producing temporal gestures. Last, beat gestures followed the direction of metaphors in speech. These findings suggest that spatial metaphors of time are processed differently in L1 and L2. The findings pave the way for potential research that might compare such metaphors in first and second language in terms of gesture production.

时间的空间隐喻在第二语言中引起更多的时间手势。
我们用空间来思考和谈论时间。我们的手势反映了我们如何将时间概念化。本研究考察了l1 -土耳其语和l2 -英语对时间空间隐喻的加工差异,观察了手势并将其与字面空间陈述进行了比较。我们要求参与者解释字面和隐喻的句子,并对他们的手势进行编码。参与者还根据句子的清晰程度对句子的传统性进行评分。个体在使用第一语言的字面句子和第二语言的隐喻句子时会产生更多的手势。较高的二语熟练程度与较少的二语手势使用相关。参与者在解释第二语言隐喻时比在解释第一语言隐喻时做出更多的时间手势。第二语言隐喻比第一语言隐喻引发更多的双手手势。个体在做出颞叶手势时使用侧轴和矢状轴的频率相同。最后,打拍子的手势遵循着言语中隐喻的方向。这些发现表明,时间的空间隐喻在第一语言和第二语言中加工是不同的。这些发现为潜在的研究铺平了道路,这些研究可能会比较第一语言和第二语言中手势产生的隐喻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes innovative contributions in the multidisciplinary field of cognitive science.  Its main purpose is to stimulate research and scientific interaction through communication between specialists in different fields on topics of common interest and to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary cognitive science. Cognitive Processing is articulated in the following sections:Cognitive DevelopmentCognitive Models of Risk and Decision MakingCognitive NeuroscienceCognitive PsychologyComputational Cognitive SciencesPhilosophy of MindNeuroimaging and Electrophysiological MethodsPsycholinguistics and Computational linguisticsQuantitative Psychology and Formal Theories in Cognitive ScienceSocial Cognition and Cognitive Science of Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信