Valued Traits of Physician Leaders: A Comparative Study of First-Year and Final-Year Medical Students' Perceptions.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sari Huikko-Tarvainen, Timo Tuovinen, Petri Kulmala
{"title":"Valued Traits of Physician Leaders: A Comparative Study of First-Year and Final-Year Medical Students' Perceptions.","authors":"Sari Huikko-Tarvainen, Timo Tuovinen, Petri Kulmala","doi":"10.1177/23821205251355072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Leadership education in medical curricula lacks clear guidelines on which specific leadership skills should be emphasized at different stages. This study examines the valued traits of physician leaders as perceived by first- and final-year medical students, aiming to support stage-specific leadership education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2021, online questionnaires were administered to first- and final-year medical students, with participation rates of 90% (104/116) and 79% (86/109), respectively. Responses to the open-ended question, \"How would you describe a good physician leader?\" were analyzed using qualitative inductive content analysis to identify valued traits, followed by thematization and comparative analysis between groups. Furthermore, trait frequency was quantified to assess its prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups shared core values, but the emphasis of specific traits shifted as students progressed through medical school. While both groups valued communication, fairness, approachability, empathy, and professionalism, final-year students placed greater emphasis on decisiveness, authority, and the ability to navigate complex clinical and administrative challenges. This comparison underscores the evolving understanding of leadership throughout medical education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that leadership education in medical curricula would benefit from a gradual and adaptive approach that aligns with students' evolving needs. Early-stage medical education should emphasize interpersonal skills, communication, emotional intelligence, accountability, and ethical decision-making. As students gain clinical experience, the focus should broaden to include decisiveness, strategic thinking, operational management, and decision-making under pressure. Integrating leadership training progressively throughout medical education, with increasing exposure to ethical and practical leadership challenges, may better prepare students for the complexities of contemporary healthcare leadership roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251355072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251355072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Leadership education in medical curricula lacks clear guidelines on which specific leadership skills should be emphasized at different stages. This study examines the valued traits of physician leaders as perceived by first- and final-year medical students, aiming to support stage-specific leadership education.

Methods: In 2021, online questionnaires were administered to first- and final-year medical students, with participation rates of 90% (104/116) and 79% (86/109), respectively. Responses to the open-ended question, "How would you describe a good physician leader?" were analyzed using qualitative inductive content analysis to identify valued traits, followed by thematization and comparative analysis between groups. Furthermore, trait frequency was quantified to assess its prevalence.

Results: Both groups shared core values, but the emphasis of specific traits shifted as students progressed through medical school. While both groups valued communication, fairness, approachability, empathy, and professionalism, final-year students placed greater emphasis on decisiveness, authority, and the ability to navigate complex clinical and administrative challenges. This comparison underscores the evolving understanding of leadership throughout medical education.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that leadership education in medical curricula would benefit from a gradual and adaptive approach that aligns with students' evolving needs. Early-stage medical education should emphasize interpersonal skills, communication, emotional intelligence, accountability, and ethical decision-making. As students gain clinical experience, the focus should broaden to include decisiveness, strategic thinking, operational management, and decision-making under pressure. Integrating leadership training progressively throughout medical education, with increasing exposure to ethical and practical leadership challenges, may better prepare students for the complexities of contemporary healthcare leadership roles.

医师领导的重要特质:一年级和大四医学生认知的比较研究。
目的:医学课程中的领导力教育缺乏明确的指导方针,说明在不同阶段应强调哪些具体的领导技能。本研究旨在探讨医学生对医师领导特质的看法,以支持不同阶段的领导教育。方法:于2021年对医学生进行在线问卷调查,参与率分别为90%(104/116)和79%(86/109)。对开放式问题“你如何描述一个好的医生领导?”的回答,我们使用定性归纳内容分析来确定有价值的特征,然后进行主题化和组间比较分析。此外,性状频率被量化以评估其流行程度。结果:两组都有共同的核心价值观,但随着学生在医学院的进步,对特定特征的强调发生了变化。虽然两组学生都重视沟通、公平、平易近人、同理心和专业精神,但高年级学生更重视果断、权威以及应对复杂临床和行政挑战的能力。这种比较强调了在整个医学教育中对领导力的理解不断发展。结论:这些发现表明,医学课程中的领导力教育将受益于循序渐进和适应性的方法,与学生不断变化的需求保持一致。早期医学教育应强调人际交往能力、沟通能力、情商、责任感和道德决策。随着学生获得临床经验,重点应扩大到包括决策能力、战略思维、运营管理和压力下的决策。在整个医学教育中逐步整合领导力培训,增加对道德和实践领导力挑战的接触,可以更好地为学生准备当代医疗保健领导角色的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信