[Role of antibiotic eluting absorbable calcium sulfate in phaseⅠrevision treatment of periprosthetic knee infection].

Q4 Medicine
Xiao-Bo Chen, Shuai-Lei Li, Ai-Bin Liu, Hao Chai, Yong-Qiang Sun
{"title":"[Role of antibiotic eluting absorbable calcium sulfate in phaseⅠrevision treatment of periprosthetic knee infection].","authors":"Xiao-Bo Chen, Shuai-Lei Li, Ai-Bin Liu, Hao Chai, Yong-Qiang Sun","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the role of antibiotic-eluting absorbable calcium sulfate in treating periprosthetic infection after one-stage revision of knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients(36 knees)who underwent phaseⅠrevision for periprosthesis infection after total knee arthroplasty from January 2018 to March 2022. All patients were underwent knee cavity puncture before operation and had positive results of aseptic body fluid culture, 21 patients received revision combined with antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate at stageⅠ(calcium sulfate group) during operation, and 15 patients underwent renovation at stageⅠ(revision group). There were 9 males and 12 females in calcium sulfate group, aged from 54 to 76 years old with an average of(67.6±6.2) years old. There were 15 patients in revision group, including 4 males and 11 females, aged from 60 to 75 years old with average of (69.6±4.1) years old. The levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) at 7, 14, 30 and 90 days after operation were compared between two groups, and the rate of end-infection control at follow-up were compared. The systemic antibiotic application time, hospital stay and postoperative complications were observed between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calcium sulfate group were followed up for 12 to 29 months with an average of(18.9±4.2) months, and the infection control rate was 90.5%;while revision group were followed up 18 to 29 months with average of (21.6±3.7) months, and the infection control rate was 86.7% (13/15). There were no significant differences in follow-up time and infection control rate between two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). Postoperative levels of CRP and IL-6 at 7, 14 and 30 days in calcium sulfate group were (32.79±11.48), (15.50±6.52), (9.36±3.32) mg·L<sup>-1</sup> and (17.31±6.15) pg·ml<sup>-1</sup>, respectively;which were lower than those in revision group (40.65±11.32), (30.15±10.57), (18.97±5.86) mg·L<sup>-1</sup> and (25.54±6.73) pg·ml<sup>-1</sup>, had statistical differences(<i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in IL-6 levels at 7 and 14 days after operation and CRP levels at 90 days after operation between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). The hospitalization time and systemic antibiotic application time in calcium sulfate group were (18.4±2.2) and (63.5±21.4) d, respectively;which were better than those in revision group (20.5±2.4) and (82.7±16.9) d, and had statistical differences(<i>P</i><0.05). No significant wound complications and hypercalcemia were observed in calcium sulfate group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic eluted absorbable calcium sulfate could be used to treat periprosthetic knee infection, significantly reducing CRP levels in the early postoperative period, shortening hospital stay and systemic antibiotic application time, but it does not significantly improve the control rate of revision infection at stageⅠ.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 6","pages":"580-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the role of antibiotic-eluting absorbable calcium sulfate in treating periprosthetic infection after one-stage revision of knee arthroplasty.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients(36 knees)who underwent phaseⅠrevision for periprosthesis infection after total knee arthroplasty from January 2018 to March 2022. All patients were underwent knee cavity puncture before operation and had positive results of aseptic body fluid culture, 21 patients received revision combined with antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate at stageⅠ(calcium sulfate group) during operation, and 15 patients underwent renovation at stageⅠ(revision group). There were 9 males and 12 females in calcium sulfate group, aged from 54 to 76 years old with an average of(67.6±6.2) years old. There were 15 patients in revision group, including 4 males and 11 females, aged from 60 to 75 years old with average of (69.6±4.1) years old. The levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) at 7, 14, 30 and 90 days after operation were compared between two groups, and the rate of end-infection control at follow-up were compared. The systemic antibiotic application time, hospital stay and postoperative complications were observed between two groups.

Results: Calcium sulfate group were followed up for 12 to 29 months with an average of(18.9±4.2) months, and the infection control rate was 90.5%;while revision group were followed up 18 to 29 months with average of (21.6±3.7) months, and the infection control rate was 86.7% (13/15). There were no significant differences in follow-up time and infection control rate between two groups(P>0.05). Postoperative levels of CRP and IL-6 at 7, 14 and 30 days in calcium sulfate group were (32.79±11.48), (15.50±6.52), (9.36±3.32) mg·L-1 and (17.31±6.15) pg·ml-1, respectively;which were lower than those in revision group (40.65±11.32), (30.15±10.57), (18.97±5.86) mg·L-1 and (25.54±6.73) pg·ml-1, had statistical differences(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in IL-6 levels at 7 and 14 days after operation and CRP levels at 90 days after operation between two groups (P>0.05). The hospitalization time and systemic antibiotic application time in calcium sulfate group were (18.4±2.2) and (63.5±21.4) d, respectively;which were better than those in revision group (20.5±2.4) and (82.7±16.9) d, and had statistical differences(P<0.05). No significant wound complications and hypercalcemia were observed in calcium sulfate group.

Conclusion: Antibiotic eluted absorbable calcium sulfate could be used to treat periprosthetic knee infection, significantly reducing CRP levels in the early postoperative period, shortening hospital stay and systemic antibiotic application time, but it does not significantly improve the control rate of revision infection at stageⅠ.

【抗生素洗脱可吸收硫酸钙在膝关节假体周围感染Ⅰ期翻修治疗中的作用】。
目的:探讨抗生素洗脱型可吸收硫酸钙在膝关节置换术一期翻修后假体周围感染治疗中的作用。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年3月全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染行Ⅰ期翻修的36例患者(36个膝关节)。所有患者术前均行膝关节穿刺,无菌体液培养阳性,术中21例患者行翻修联合抗生素负载硫酸钙Ⅰ期(硫酸钙组),15例患者行翻修Ⅰ期(翻修组)。硫酸钙组男性9例,女性12例,年龄54 ~ 76岁,平均(67.6±6.2)岁。翻修组15例,男4例,女11例,年龄60 ~ 75岁,平均(69.6±4.1)岁。比较两组患者术后7、14、30、90 d血清c反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)水平及随访时感染末期控制率。观察两组患者全身性抗生素应用时间、住院时间及术后并发症。结果:硫酸钙组患者随访12 ~ 29个月,平均(18.9±4.2)个月,感染控制率为90.5%;改良组患者随访18 ~ 29个月,平均(21.6±3.7)个月,感染控制率为86.7%(13/15)。两组患者随访时间及感染控制率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后第7、14、30天,硫酸钙组CRP、IL-6水平分别为(32.79±11.48)、(15.50±6.52)、(9.36±3.32)mg·L-1、(17.31±6.15)pg·ml-1,低于复习组(40.65±11.32)、(30.15±10.57)、(18.97±5.86)mg·L-1、(25.54±6.73)pg·ml-1,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。硫酸钙组住院时间(18.4±2.2)d,全身应用抗生素时间(63.5±21.4)d,优于复习组(20.5±2.4)d,优于复习组(82.7±16.9)d,差异有统计学意义(p)。抗生素洗脱的可吸收硫酸钙可用于治疗假体周围膝关节感染,可显著降低术后早期CRP水平,缩短住院时间和全身抗生素应用时间,但不能显著提高Ⅰ期翻修感染控制率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信