[Influence of the presence or absence of the second hammertoe on clinical effect of hallux valgus].

Q4 Medicine
Jing Tian, Tian-Yu Han, Bing Xie
{"title":"[Influence of the presence or absence of the second hammertoe on clinical effect of hallux valgus].","authors":"Jing Tian, Tian-Yu Han, Bing Xie","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical effect of Ludloff operation on the clinical efficacy of patients with hallux valgus combined with hammertoe of the second toe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 66 patients with hallux valgus treated with Ludloff surgery from July 2015 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to exclusion criteria, 33 patients with hallux valgus combined with hammertoe were finally included as case group, and 33 patients with simple hallux valgus were paired as control group. There were 11 males and 22 females in case group, aged from 24 to 62 years old with an average of (33.6±12.7) years old;body mass index (BMI) ranged from 19 to 25 kg·m<sup>-2</sup> with an average of(21.7±3.1) kg·m<sup>-2</sup>;17 patients on the left side and 16 patients on the right side;hallux valgus angle (HVA) ranged from 25° to 47° with an average of (36.3±10.2) °;the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) ranged from 13° to 21° with an average of (16.9±3.2) °. There were 12 males and 21 females in control group, aged from 22 to 61 years old with an average of (32.2±10.9) years old;BMI ranged from 18 to 26 kg·m<sup>-2</sup> with an average of (22.0±4.2) kg·m<sup>-2</sup>;15 patients on the left side and 18 patients on the right side;HVA ranged from 26° to 46° with an average of (37.2±9.3) °;IMA ranged from 12° to 21° with an average of (17.3±4.7) °. HVA, IMA, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) were compared at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were completed 1 year postoperative follow-up. Postoperative cutaneous margin necrosis occurred in 2 patients of case group and incision rupture occurred in 1 patient of control group. There was no significant difference between two groups (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.058, <i>P</i>>0.05). Both groups were achieved bone union at stageⅠat 12 weeks after opertaion, and no recurrence of bunion was observed during follow-up. Three months after operation, AOFAS forefoot function score of case group was (73.4±8.6), which was lower than that of control group (82.1±10.3), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in HVA, IMA, AOFAS and VAS between two groups at 6 and 12 months after operation (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ludloff surgery for the treatment of bunions with malleform toe of the second toe is slow in the early postoperative functional recovery, but it did not affect the long-term clinical outcome of the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 6","pages":"553-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical effect of Ludloff operation on the clinical efficacy of patients with hallux valgus combined with hammertoe of the second toe.

Methods: The clinical data of 66 patients with hallux valgus treated with Ludloff surgery from July 2015 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to exclusion criteria, 33 patients with hallux valgus combined with hammertoe were finally included as case group, and 33 patients with simple hallux valgus were paired as control group. There were 11 males and 22 females in case group, aged from 24 to 62 years old with an average of (33.6±12.7) years old;body mass index (BMI) ranged from 19 to 25 kg·m-2 with an average of(21.7±3.1) kg·m-2;17 patients on the left side and 16 patients on the right side;hallux valgus angle (HVA) ranged from 25° to 47° with an average of (36.3±10.2) °;the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) ranged from 13° to 21° with an average of (16.9±3.2) °. There were 12 males and 21 females in control group, aged from 22 to 61 years old with an average of (32.2±10.9) years old;BMI ranged from 18 to 26 kg·m-2 with an average of (22.0±4.2) kg·m-2;15 patients on the left side and 18 patients on the right side;HVA ranged from 26° to 46° with an average of (37.2±9.3) °;IMA ranged from 12° to 21° with an average of (17.3±4.7) °. HVA, IMA, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) were compared at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation between two groups.

Results: Both groups were completed 1 year postoperative follow-up. Postoperative cutaneous margin necrosis occurred in 2 patients of case group and incision rupture occurred in 1 patient of control group. There was no significant difference between two groups (χ2=0.058, P>0.05). Both groups were achieved bone union at stageⅠat 12 weeks after opertaion, and no recurrence of bunion was observed during follow-up. Three months after operation, AOFAS forefoot function score of case group was (73.4±8.6), which was lower than that of control group (82.1±10.3), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in HVA, IMA, AOFAS and VAS between two groups at 6 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Ludloff surgery for the treatment of bunions with malleform toe of the second toe is slow in the early postoperative functional recovery, but it did not affect the long-term clinical outcome of the patients.

[第二槌状趾有无对拇外翻临床疗效的影响]。
目的:比较Ludloff手术治疗拇外翻合并第二趾锤状趾的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年7月~ 2022年7月66例拇外翻行Ludloff手术治疗的临床资料。根据排除标准,最终将33例拇外翻合并锤状趾患者作为病例组,33例单纯性拇外翻患者作为对照组。病例组男性11例,女性22例,年龄24 ~ 62岁,平均(33.6±12.7)岁,身体质量指数(BMI) 19 ~ 25 kg·m-2,平均(21.7±3.1)kg·m-2,左侧17例,右侧16例,拇外翻角(HVA) 25°~ 47°,平均(36.3±10.2)°,跖间角(IMA) 13°~ 21°,平均(16.9±3.2)°。对照组男性12例,女性21例,年龄22 ~ 61岁,平均(32.2±10.9)岁,BMI 18 ~ 26 kg·m-2,平均(22.0±4.2)kg·m-2,左侧15例,右侧18例,HVA 26°~ 46°,平均(37.2±9.3)°,IMA 12°~ 21°,平均(17.3±4.7)°。比较两组患者术后3、6、12个月HVA、IMA、美国矫形足踝学会(AOFAS)前足评分及视觉模拟评分(VAS)。结果:两组均完成术后1年随访。病例组术后2例发生皮缘坏死,对照组1例发生切口破裂。两组间比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.058, P < 0.05)。术后12周,两组患者均于Ⅰ期实现骨愈合,随访期间均未见拇囊炎复发。术后3个月,病例组AOFAS前足功能评分为(73.4±8.6)分,低于对照组(82.1±10.3)分,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:Ludloff手术治疗第二趾锤状趾拇外翻术后早期功能恢复缓慢,但不影响患者远期临床预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信