[Comparative study of combined external fixator and plate fixation in the treatment of humerus throwing fracture].

Q4 Medicine
Pei-Gang Gao, Xing-Cun Wang, Li-Qiang Zhu
{"title":"[Comparative study of combined external fixator and plate fixation in the treatment of humerus throwing fracture].","authors":"Pei-Gang Gao, Xing-Cun Wang, Li-Qiang Zhu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical efficacy of combined external fixator and plate fixation in treating throwing fracture of humerus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven male patients with throwing humerus fracture admitted from February 2018 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into external fixator group and plate group according to different treatment methods. There were 32 patients in external fixator group, aged from 18 to 27 years old with an average of (23.6±2.6) years old;19 patients with type A, 13 patients with type B according to AO classification;fixed by combined external fixer. There were 35 patients in plate group, aged from 17 to 28 years old with an average of (23.2±2.9) years old;21 patients with type A, 14 patients with type B according to AO classification;fixed with steel plate screws. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total incision length, fracture healing time and complications were compared between two groups. Clinical effect was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and shoulder Neer score at 12 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in both groups were successfully completed operation and followed up for 15 to 21 months with an average of (18.3±3.4) months. In external fixator group, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, fracture healing time and postoperative MEPS of elbow joint function at 12 months were (68.5±15.7) ml, (4.9±1.2) cm, (10.5±2.9) weeks, (93.6±5.1) min, respectively;which were superior to ml (149.4±38.9) ml, (12.5±2.4) cm, (12.8±2.7) weeks, (85.6±6.8) in plate group (<i>P</i><0.05), and had significant differences;there were no significant difference in operative time and postoperative Neer score of shoulder joint function at 12 months between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). There were 6 patients occurred radial nerve injury in plate group and no patient occurred radial nerve injury in external fixator group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=6.025, <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant difference in postoperative MEPS grading and Neer shoulder joint grading at 12 months (<i>P</i>>0.05). Bone healing was achieved in both groups without failure of internal fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined external fixator for the treatment of humerus throwing fracture has characteristics of low incidence of radial nerve injury, less bleeding, less complications, fast fracture healing, which is convenient to remove after fracture healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 6","pages":"613-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical efficacy of combined external fixator and plate fixation in treating throwing fracture of humerus.

Methods: Sixty-seven male patients with throwing humerus fracture admitted from February 2018 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into external fixator group and plate group according to different treatment methods. There were 32 patients in external fixator group, aged from 18 to 27 years old with an average of (23.6±2.6) years old;19 patients with type A, 13 patients with type B according to AO classification;fixed by combined external fixer. There were 35 patients in plate group, aged from 17 to 28 years old with an average of (23.2±2.9) years old;21 patients with type A, 14 patients with type B according to AO classification;fixed with steel plate screws. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total incision length, fracture healing time and complications were compared between two groups. Clinical effect was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and shoulder Neer score at 12 months after operation.

Results: Patients in both groups were successfully completed operation and followed up for 15 to 21 months with an average of (18.3±3.4) months. In external fixator group, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, fracture healing time and postoperative MEPS of elbow joint function at 12 months were (68.5±15.7) ml, (4.9±1.2) cm, (10.5±2.9) weeks, (93.6±5.1) min, respectively;which were superior to ml (149.4±38.9) ml, (12.5±2.4) cm, (12.8±2.7) weeks, (85.6±6.8) in plate group (P<0.05), and had significant differences;there were no significant difference in operative time and postoperative Neer score of shoulder joint function at 12 months between two groups (P>0.05). There were 6 patients occurred radial nerve injury in plate group and no patient occurred radial nerve injury in external fixator group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (χ2=6.025, P<0.05). There were no significant difference in postoperative MEPS grading and Neer shoulder joint grading at 12 months (P>0.05). Bone healing was achieved in both groups without failure of internal fixation.

Conclusion: The combined external fixator for the treatment of humerus throwing fracture has characteristics of low incidence of radial nerve injury, less bleeding, less complications, fast fracture healing, which is convenient to remove after fracture healing.

[联合外固定架与钢板固定治疗肱骨投掷骨折的比较研究]。
目的:比较外固定架与钢板联合固定治疗投掷性肱骨骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2018年2月至2021年2月收治的67例男性投掷性肱骨骨折患者,根据治疗方法的不同分为外固定架组和钢板组。外固定架组32例,年龄18 ~ 27岁,平均(23.6±2.6)岁,A型19例,B型13例,按AO分型,采用联合外固定架固定。钢板组35例,年龄17 ~ 28岁,平均(23.2±2.9)岁;A型21例,B型14例,按AO分型;钢板螺钉固定。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口总长度、骨折愈合时间及并发症。术后12个月采用Mayo肘关节功能评分(MEPS)和肩关节功能评分评价临床效果。结果:两组患者均顺利完成手术,随访15 ~ 21个月,平均(18.3±3.4)个月。外固定架组术中出血量(68.5±15.7)ml,切口长度(4.9±1.2)cm,骨折愈合时间(10.5±2.9)周,术后12个月肘关节功能MEPS(93.6±5.1)min)优于钢板组(149.4±38.9)ml,(12.5±2.4)cm,(12.8±2.7)周,(85.6±6.8)周(PP bb0 0.05)。钢板组有6例患者发生桡神经损伤,外固定架组无患者发生桡神经损伤,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.025, PP>0.05)。两组均实现骨愈合,内固定均未失败。结论:联合外固定架治疗肱骨抛射骨折具有桡神经损伤发生率低、出血少、并发症少、骨折愈合快、骨折愈合后方便取出等特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信