Motor resonance and inhibitory mechanisms in action observation as revealed by corticospinal excitability.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Carlos Nieto-Doval, Aynur Ragimova, Gleb Perevoznyuk, Traian Popa, Oleg Shevtsov, Victoria Moiseeva, Matteo Feurra
{"title":"Motor resonance and inhibitory mechanisms in action observation as revealed by corticospinal excitability.","authors":"Carlos Nieto-Doval, Aynur Ragimova, Gleb Perevoznyuk, Traian Popa, Oleg Shevtsov, Victoria Moiseeva, Matteo Feurra","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-03989-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor resonance (MoR) refers to the automatic activation of motor circuits during action observation, reflecting an internal simulation of the observed movement. This phenomenon is thought to arise from the activity of mirror neuron regions, which modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability via cortico-cortical pathways. MoR, which is believed to be involved in the mechanism underlying action understanding and motor learning, has been widely studied using visual stimuli and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, the optimal form of movement presentation and TMS timing remains unclear. This study compared the effects of static photographs and videos on the MoR activation and explored the ideal timing for TMS. Participants observed abduction movements of the index finger (controlled by the first dorsal interosseous muscle, FDI) and the little finger (controlled by the abductor digiti minimi muscle, ADM) presented as photographs or videos. The task included three conditions: Photo (static images), Video (full movement videos), and Postvideo (post-movement period). TMS was applied over the primary motor cortex at 0, 320, or 640 ms from movement onset (Photo, Video) and at the same intervals from movement offset (Postvideo). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from FDI and ADM. The Postvideo condition yielded the strongest MEP modulations, with inhibition in the non-matching muscle and excitation in the muscle corresponding to the observed movement. In contrast, Photo and Video conditions showed time-dependent reductions in cortical excitability, especially in non-matching muscles. These findings suggest that applying TMS after movement observation provides a more accurate approach to studying MoR and highlights the role of motor surround inhibition in motor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03989-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor resonance (MoR) refers to the automatic activation of motor circuits during action observation, reflecting an internal simulation of the observed movement. This phenomenon is thought to arise from the activity of mirror neuron regions, which modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability via cortico-cortical pathways. MoR, which is believed to be involved in the mechanism underlying action understanding and motor learning, has been widely studied using visual stimuli and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, the optimal form of movement presentation and TMS timing remains unclear. This study compared the effects of static photographs and videos on the MoR activation and explored the ideal timing for TMS. Participants observed abduction movements of the index finger (controlled by the first dorsal interosseous muscle, FDI) and the little finger (controlled by the abductor digiti minimi muscle, ADM) presented as photographs or videos. The task included three conditions: Photo (static images), Video (full movement videos), and Postvideo (post-movement period). TMS was applied over the primary motor cortex at 0, 320, or 640 ms from movement onset (Photo, Video) and at the same intervals from movement offset (Postvideo). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from FDI and ADM. The Postvideo condition yielded the strongest MEP modulations, with inhibition in the non-matching muscle and excitation in the muscle corresponding to the observed movement. In contrast, Photo and Video conditions showed time-dependent reductions in cortical excitability, especially in non-matching muscles. These findings suggest that applying TMS after movement observation provides a more accurate approach to studying MoR and highlights the role of motor surround inhibition in motor control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

皮质脊髓兴奋性在运动观察中的运动共振和抑制机制。
运动共振(Motor resonance, MoR)是指运动观察过程中运动回路的自动激活,反映了被观察运动的内部模拟。这种现象被认为是由镜像神经元区域的活动引起的,镜像神经元区域通过皮质-皮质通路调节初级运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性。MoR被认为参与动作理解和运动学习的机制,已被广泛应用于视觉刺激和经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究。然而,运动呈现的最佳形式和经颅磁刺激时间尚不清楚。本研究比较了静态照片和视频对MoR激活的影响,探讨了经颅磁刺激的理想时机。参与者观察了食指(由第一背骨间肌FDI控制)和小指(由指外展肌ADM控制)的外展运动,并以照片或视频的形式呈现。该任务包括三个条件:照片(静态图像)、视频(完整的运动视频)和后视频(运动后的时间段)。在运动开始后0,320或640 ms以及运动偏移后相同的时间间隔(后视频)对初级运动皮层施加TMS。记录FDI和adm的运动诱发电位(MEP),视频后条件下MEP调制最强,非匹配肌肉抑制,与观察到的运动相对应的肌肉兴奋。相比之下,照片和视频条件显示皮层兴奋性随时间减少,特别是在非匹配的肌肉中。这些发现表明,在运动观察后应用经颅磁刺激可以更准确地研究MoR,并突出运动环绕抑制在运动控制中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信