Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Javier O Garcia, Justin Brooks, Kanika Bansal
{"title":"Influence of cognitive networks and task performance on fMRI-based state classification using DNN models.","authors":"Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Javier O Garcia, Justin Brooks, Kanika Bansal","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-05690-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel at extracting insights from complex data across various fields, however, their application in cognitive neuroscience remains limited, largely due to the lack of approaches with interpretability. Here, we employ two different and complementary DNN models, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM), to classify cognitive task states from fMRI data, focusing on the cognitive underpinnings of the classification. The 1D-CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 81% (Macro AUC = 0.96), while the BiLSTM reached 78% (Macro AUC = 0.95). Despite the architectural differences, both models demonstrated a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and individual cognitive performance (p < 0.05 for 1D-CNN, and p < 0.001 for BiLSTM), with lower classification accuracy observed in individuals with poorer task performance. Feature importance analysis highlighted the dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences are primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also showed relatively high importance. We observed individual trait-based effects and subtle model-specific differences: 1D-CNN yielded slightly better overall performance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior. This study highlights the application of interpretable DNNs in revealing cognitive mechanisms associated with task performance and individual variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05690-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel at extracting insights from complex data across various fields, however, their application in cognitive neuroscience remains limited, largely due to the lack of approaches with interpretability. Here, we employ two different and complementary DNN models, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM), to classify cognitive task states from fMRI data, focusing on the cognitive underpinnings of the classification. The 1D-CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 81% (Macro AUC = 0.96), while the BiLSTM reached 78% (Macro AUC = 0.95). Despite the architectural differences, both models demonstrated a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and individual cognitive performance (p < 0.05 for 1D-CNN, and p < 0.001 for BiLSTM), with lower classification accuracy observed in individuals with poorer task performance. Feature importance analysis highlighted the dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences are primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also showed relatively high importance. We observed individual trait-based effects and subtle model-specific differences: 1D-CNN yielded slightly better overall performance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior. This study highlights the application of interpretable DNNs in revealing cognitive mechanisms associated with task performance and individual variability.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.