{"title":"Characteristics of the gut microbiota in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who responded to immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Hideyuki Komatsu, Takuya Sugimoto, Yuzuru Ogata, Takahito Miura, Masanori Aida, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Mitsuhisa Kawai, Yukihiro Yano, Masahide Mori, Yoshiyuki Shishido","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-08049-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer, the number of deaths from lung cancer remains high, and further improvements in response rates are necessary. Recently, the gut microbiota has been reported to be involved in the therapeutic effects of ICIs; however, only a few studies have examined patients with lung cancer in this context. In the current study, we aimed to explore the association between the gut microbiota before therapy and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The a-diversity of the intestinal microbiota in patients who responded to ICI treatment (responders) was significantly higher than that in those who did not respond to ICIs (non-responders). Additionally, the abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae was significantly higher in the responders than in the non-responders. Furthermore, patients with a high abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae had significantly longer overall survival than those with a low abundance. Counts of Levilactobacillus brevis were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. Our findings suggest that a higher diversity of the gut microbiota and an abundance of Bifidobacterium and/or L. brevis are distinctive features of the microbiota in patients with NSCLC who respond to ICI treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08049-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer, the number of deaths from lung cancer remains high, and further improvements in response rates are necessary. Recently, the gut microbiota has been reported to be involved in the therapeutic effects of ICIs; however, only a few studies have examined patients with lung cancer in this context. In the current study, we aimed to explore the association between the gut microbiota before therapy and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The a-diversity of the intestinal microbiota in patients who responded to ICI treatment (responders) was significantly higher than that in those who did not respond to ICIs (non-responders). Additionally, the abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae was significantly higher in the responders than in the non-responders. Furthermore, patients with a high abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae had significantly longer overall survival than those with a low abundance. Counts of Levilactobacillus brevis were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. Our findings suggest that a higher diversity of the gut microbiota and an abundance of Bifidobacterium and/or L. brevis are distinctive features of the microbiota in patients with NSCLC who respond to ICI treatment.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.