Karina Undem, Taina Leinonen, Daniel Falkstedt, Gun Johansson, Jacob Pedersen, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Svetlana Solovieva
{"title":"Occupational differences in working life expectancy and working years lost in Nordic countries.","authors":"Karina Undem, Taina Leinonen, Daniel Falkstedt, Gun Johansson, Jacob Pedersen, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Svetlana Solovieva","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Risk of exit from work is both occupation- and country-specific. This study investigated occupational differences in working life expectancy (WLE) and reasons for working years lost (WYL) among employed workers in three Nordic countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized registry-based cohorts of the employed population in Denmark (N=2 383 657), Finland (N=1 266 705) and Norway (N=1 761 166) to estimate WLE for ages 30-65 using the Sullivan method with 2015 data. We further estimated WYL due to sickness absence, unemployment, disability retirement, old-age retirement and other reasons. The analyses were stratified by gender and major occupational group (1st digit in the ISCO-88 code).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Occupational differences in WLE and WYL were observed in all countries. The overall pattern across the countries showed that legislators, senior officials and managers and professionals generally had high WLE, while service and sales workers and employees in manual occupations tended to have lower WLE, with employees in elementary occupations performing the worst. Reasons for WYL varied with country. In general, disability retirement was a significant factor in Denmark, unemployment in Finland, and sickness absence in Norway.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A similar occupational pattern in WLE was observed across the countries, with some occupational groups consistently showing high or low WLE. However, the magnitude of occupational differences in WLE and the reasons for WYL varied across the countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Risk of exit from work is both occupation- and country-specific. This study investigated occupational differences in working life expectancy (WLE) and reasons for working years lost (WYL) among employed workers in three Nordic countries.
Methods: We utilized registry-based cohorts of the employed population in Denmark (N=2 383 657), Finland (N=1 266 705) and Norway (N=1 761 166) to estimate WLE for ages 30-65 using the Sullivan method with 2015 data. We further estimated WYL due to sickness absence, unemployment, disability retirement, old-age retirement and other reasons. The analyses were stratified by gender and major occupational group (1st digit in the ISCO-88 code).
Results: Occupational differences in WLE and WYL were observed in all countries. The overall pattern across the countries showed that legislators, senior officials and managers and professionals generally had high WLE, while service and sales workers and employees in manual occupations tended to have lower WLE, with employees in elementary occupations performing the worst. Reasons for WYL varied with country. In general, disability retirement was a significant factor in Denmark, unemployment in Finland, and sickness absence in Norway.
Conclusion: A similar occupational pattern in WLE was observed across the countries, with some occupational groups consistently showing high or low WLE. However, the magnitude of occupational differences in WLE and the reasons for WYL varied across the countries.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).