Precise Correction of the Pde6b-L659P Mutation Causing Retinal Degeneration with Minimum Bystander Editing by Advanced Genome Editing Tools.

IF 10.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Research Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34133/research.0770
Zhiquan Liu, Siyu Chen, Yang Sun
{"title":"Precise Correction of the <i>Pde6b</i>-L659P Mutation Causing Retinal Degeneration with Minimum Bystander Editing by Advanced Genome Editing Tools.","authors":"Zhiquan Liu, Siyu Chen, Yang Sun","doi":"10.34133/research.0770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently developed base editing (BE), prime editing (PE), and click editing (CE) technologies enable precise and efficient genome editing with minimal risk of double-strand breaks and associated toxicity. However, their effectiveness in correcting real disease-causing mutations has not been systematically compared. Here, we aim to evaluate the potential of BE, PE, and CE technologies in rescuing the retinal degeneration-causing <i>Pde6b</i> (c.1976T>C, p.L659P) mutation. This site is prone to bystander effects, making it an ideal model for comparing the editing outcomes of these 3 novel technologies, particularly their editing precision. We optimized BE, PE, and CE systems in vitro using <i>Pde6b</i>-L659P cell models and compared their editing via deep sequencing. BE and PE had similar efficiency, but PE was the most precise, minimizing bystander edits. CE had lower efficiency and higher indel rates, needing further optimization. Using the optimal PE system for in vivo electroporation in <i>Pde6b</i>-L659P mice, we achieved 12.4% targeted repair with high precision, partially rescuing retinal degeneration. This study demonstrates proof of concept for the precise correction of the <i>Pde6b</i>-L659P mutation causing retinal degeneration using BE, PE, and CE tools. The findings offer valuable insights into the future optimization of precision gene editing techniques and their potential translational applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21120,"journal":{"name":"Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"0770"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently developed base editing (BE), prime editing (PE), and click editing (CE) technologies enable precise and efficient genome editing with minimal risk of double-strand breaks and associated toxicity. However, their effectiveness in correcting real disease-causing mutations has not been systematically compared. Here, we aim to evaluate the potential of BE, PE, and CE technologies in rescuing the retinal degeneration-causing Pde6b (c.1976T>C, p.L659P) mutation. This site is prone to bystander effects, making it an ideal model for comparing the editing outcomes of these 3 novel technologies, particularly their editing precision. We optimized BE, PE, and CE systems in vitro using Pde6b-L659P cell models and compared their editing via deep sequencing. BE and PE had similar efficiency, but PE was the most precise, minimizing bystander edits. CE had lower efficiency and higher indel rates, needing further optimization. Using the optimal PE system for in vivo electroporation in Pde6b-L659P mice, we achieved 12.4% targeted repair with high precision, partially rescuing retinal degeneration. This study demonstrates proof of concept for the precise correction of the Pde6b-L659P mutation causing retinal degeneration using BE, PE, and CE tools. The findings offer valuable insights into the future optimization of precision gene editing techniques and their potential translational applications.

利用先进的基因组编辑工具以最小的旁观者编辑精确校正Pde6b-L659P突变导致视网膜变性
最近开发的碱基编辑(BE)、起始编辑(PE)和点击编辑(CE)技术能够在双链断裂和相关毒性风险最小的情况下实现精确和高效的基因组编辑。然而,它们在纠正真正的致病突变方面的有效性尚未得到系统的比较。在这里,我们的目的是评估BE, PE和CE技术在挽救视网膜变性引起的Pde6b (c.1976T >c, p.L659P)突变中的潜力。该网站容易产生旁观者效应,是比较这三种新技术的编辑效果,特别是编辑精度的理想模型。我们使用Pde6b-L659P细胞模型体外优化BE、PE和CE系统,并通过深度测序比较它们的编辑。BE和PE具有相似的效率,但PE最精确,最大限度地减少了旁观者的编辑。CE效率较低,负压率较高,需要进一步优化。采用最佳PE系统在Pde6b-L659P小鼠体内电穿孔,我们实现了12.4%的高精度靶向修复,部分挽救了视网膜变性。本研究证明了使用BE、PE和CE工具精确校正导致视网膜变性的Pde6b-L659P突变的概念。这些发现为未来精确基因编辑技术的优化及其潜在的转化应用提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research
Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Research serves as a global platform for academic exchange, collaboration, and technological advancements. This journal welcomes high-quality research contributions from any domain, with open arms to authors from around the globe. Comprising fundamental research in the life and physical sciences, Research also highlights significant findings and issues in engineering and applied science. The journal proudly features original research articles, reviews, perspectives, and editorials, fostering a diverse and dynamic scholarly environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信