Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to electrocution: Characteristics and outcomes

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Aidan Smith , Rod Mason , Jake Kilsby , Ashanti Dantanarayana , Tony Walker , Ziad Nehme
{"title":"Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to electrocution: Characteristics and outcomes","authors":"Aidan Smith ,&nbsp;Rod Mason ,&nbsp;Jake Kilsby ,&nbsp;Ashanti Dantanarayana ,&nbsp;Tony Walker ,&nbsp;Ziad Nehme","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To characterise the epidemiology of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA) secondary to electrocution and determine its association with the initial arrest rhythm and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Between 2000 and 2023, we retrospectively compared OHCA secondary to electrocution with medical and other non-medical aetiologies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk-adjusted odds of presenting in a shockable rhythm and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 118,677 OHCA cases included in the study, 113 (0.1%) were secondary to electrocution. The crude incidence was 0.11 per 100,000 person-years, reducing significantly over time (<em>p</em> &lt;0.001). Electrocution cases were more likely to be male, occur in a workplace, and present in a shockable rhythm compared to medical and non-medical causes. After adjustment for arrest characteristics, the odds of presenting in a shockable rhythm were similar between electrocution and medical causes (AOR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.59, 2.01; <em>p</em> = 0.790) but lower for non-medical causes (AOR 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.14; <em>p</em> &lt;0.001). Electrocution had higher unadjusted odds of survival to hospital discharge when compared to medical causes (OR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.80; <em>p</em> = 0.009) and non-medical causes (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.39; <em>p</em> &lt;0.001), but this was not significant after adjustment for differences in arrest characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Electrocution cases had a similar likelihood of presenting in a shockable rhythm to medical causes. Electrocution was not an independent predictor of survival, with favourable prognosis appearing to be attenuated by other factors, including younger age and a higher proportion of initial shockable rhythms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 110696"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225002084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To characterise the epidemiology of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA) secondary to electrocution and determine its association with the initial arrest rhythm and patient outcomes.

Method

Between 2000 and 2023, we retrospectively compared OHCA secondary to electrocution with medical and other non-medical aetiologies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk-adjusted odds of presenting in a shockable rhythm and patient outcomes.

Results

Of the 118,677 OHCA cases included in the study, 113 (0.1%) were secondary to electrocution. The crude incidence was 0.11 per 100,000 person-years, reducing significantly over time (p <0.001). Electrocution cases were more likely to be male, occur in a workplace, and present in a shockable rhythm compared to medical and non-medical causes. After adjustment for arrest characteristics, the odds of presenting in a shockable rhythm were similar between electrocution and medical causes (AOR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.59, 2.01; p = 0.790) but lower for non-medical causes (AOR 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.14; p <0.001). Electrocution had higher unadjusted odds of survival to hospital discharge when compared to medical causes (OR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.80; p = 0.009) and non-medical causes (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.39; p <0.001), but this was not significant after adjustment for differences in arrest characteristics.

Conclusion

Electrocution cases had a similar likelihood of presenting in a shockable rhythm to medical causes. Electrocution was not an independent predictor of survival, with favourable prognosis appearing to be attenuated by other factors, including younger age and a higher proportion of initial shockable rhythms.
院外继发于电刑的心脏骤停:特征和结果。
目的:了解院外心脏骤停(OHCA)继发于电刑的流行病学特征,并确定其与初始骤停节律和患者预后的关系。方法:回顾性比较2000年至2023年期间,电刑继发OHCA与医疗和其他非医疗原因。采用多变量逻辑回归来评估经风险调整后出现震荡性心律的几率和患者预后。结果:在纳入研究的118,677例OHCA病例中,113例(0.1%)继发于电刑。原始发生率为0.11 / 100,000人年,随着时间的推移显著降低(p结论:电刑病例与医学原因有相似的可能表现为休克节律。电刑并不是一个独立的生存预测指标,良好的预后似乎被其他因素削弱,包括年轻和较高比例的初始电击节律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信