Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Case-Control Study.

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Alex A Nguyen, Eric A Cohen, Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Raymond J Acciavatti, Lauren Pantalone, Walter C Mankowski, Christopher G Scott, Stacey Winham, Celine M Vachon, Andrew D Maidment, Emily F Conant, Anne Marie McCarthy, Despina Kontos
{"title":"Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Case-Control Study.","authors":"Alex A Nguyen, Eric A Cohen, Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Raymond J Acciavatti, Lauren Pantalone, Walter C Mankowski, Christopher G Scott, Stacey Winham, Celine M Vachon, Andrew D Maidment, Emily F Conant, Anne Marie McCarthy, Despina Kontos","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To compare the performance of volumetric radiomic parenchymal pattern analysis from three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images with that of two-dimensional (2D) digital mammography (DM) and 2D sections from DBT in assessing breast cancer risk relative to breast density measurements. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective matched case-control study among individuals who underwent concurrent DM and DBT screening from March 2011 through December 2014. The Cancer Phenomics Toolkit was used to calculate radiomic features from craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in all study patients, matched on race and age, for various experimental settings, including image resolution and window size. For each image type, conditional logistic regression evaluated the association of radiomic features, along with age, body mass index (BMI), and area percent density (PD) (from the Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Assessment software), with breast cancer, using the C statistic as the measure of model predictive ability. Model fit was compared via likelihood ratio tests. Results The study included 924 female patients (median age, 61 years [IQR: 51-69 years]), with 187 cases and 737 controls. Volumetric features from 3D reconstructed DBT scans had, on average, higher C statistics across all experimental conditions. Among models using only radiomic features, C statistics were highest for models using features from 3D images (mean C statistic: 0.68, <i>P</i> < .001); models using features from 2D image types resulted in lower mean C statistics (0.60 to 0.65). A baseline model using age, BMI, and area PD had a C statistic of 0.60. The effect of higher image resolution and smaller window size were not substantial, supporting the use of less computationally intensive processing. Conclusion Fully automated 3D parenchymal analysis from DBT improved breast cancer risk estimation beyond markers derived from area breast density and 2D images. <b>Keywords:</b> Mammography, Tomosynthesis, Breast, Volume Analysis <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 4","pages":"e240318"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To compare the performance of volumetric radiomic parenchymal pattern analysis from three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images with that of two-dimensional (2D) digital mammography (DM) and 2D sections from DBT in assessing breast cancer risk relative to breast density measurements. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective matched case-control study among individuals who underwent concurrent DM and DBT screening from March 2011 through December 2014. The Cancer Phenomics Toolkit was used to calculate radiomic features from craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in all study patients, matched on race and age, for various experimental settings, including image resolution and window size. For each image type, conditional logistic regression evaluated the association of radiomic features, along with age, body mass index (BMI), and area percent density (PD) (from the Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Assessment software), with breast cancer, using the C statistic as the measure of model predictive ability. Model fit was compared via likelihood ratio tests. Results The study included 924 female patients (median age, 61 years [IQR: 51-69 years]), with 187 cases and 737 controls. Volumetric features from 3D reconstructed DBT scans had, on average, higher C statistics across all experimental conditions. Among models using only radiomic features, C statistics were highest for models using features from 3D images (mean C statistic: 0.68, P < .001); models using features from 2D image types resulted in lower mean C statistics (0.60 to 0.65). A baseline model using age, BMI, and area PD had a C statistic of 0.60. The effect of higher image resolution and smaller window size were not substantial, supporting the use of less computationally intensive processing. Conclusion Fully automated 3D parenchymal analysis from DBT improved breast cancer risk estimation beyond markers derived from area breast density and 2D images. Keywords: Mammography, Tomosynthesis, Breast, Volume Analysis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

数字乳腺断层合成和基于乳房x线摄影的放射组学用于乳腺癌风险评估的比较:病例对照研究。
目的比较三维(3D)数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)图像的体积放射学实质模式分析与二维(2D)数字乳房x线照相术(DM)和DBT二维切片在相对于乳腺密度测量评估乳腺癌风险方面的表现。材料和方法本研究是一项回顾性匹配病例对照研究,研究对象为2011年3月至2014年12月期间同时接受糖尿病和DBT筛查的患者。Cancer Phenomics Toolkit用于计算所有研究患者颅侧和中外侧斜位视图的放射学特征,匹配种族和年龄,各种实验设置,包括图像分辨率和窗口大小。对于每种图像类型,条件逻辑回归评估放射学特征与年龄、体重指数(BMI)和面积百分比密度(PD)(来自个体化乳腺放射密度评估软件实验室)与乳腺癌的关联,使用C统计量作为模型预测能力的度量。通过似然比检验比较模型拟合。结果纳入924例女性患者(中位年龄61岁[IQR: 51 ~ 69岁]),其中187例为病例,对照组为737例。在所有实验条件下,三维重建DBT扫描的体积特征平均具有更高的C统计值。在仅使用放射学特征的模型中,使用3D图像特征的模型的C统计量最高(平均C统计量:0.68,P < 0.001);使用2D图像类型特征的模型导致较低的平均C统计量(0.60至0.65)。使用年龄、BMI和区域PD的基线模型的C统计值为0.60。更高的图像分辨率和更小的窗口尺寸的效果并不显著,支持使用较少的计算密集型处理。结论基于DBT的全自动三维实质分析比基于区域乳腺密度和二维图像的标志物更能改善乳腺癌风险评估。关键词:乳腺x线摄影,断层合成,乳腺,体积分析本文有补充材料。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信