Psychometric testing of two respiratory bolt-on items to EQ-5D-5L in patients with obstructive airway diseases.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-04016-8
Ai-Ping Chua, Mathieu F Janssen, Ling-Jie Cheng, Jan V Busschbach, Nan Luo
{"title":"Psychometric testing of two respiratory bolt-on items to EQ-5D-5L in patients with obstructive airway diseases.","authors":"Ai-Ping Chua, Mathieu F Janssen, Ling-Jie Cheng, Jan V Busschbach, Nan Luo","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04016-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Two recently developed respiratory bolt-ons were shown to improve the construct validity of EQ-5D-5L among community-treated patients with obstructive airway disease (OAD). We evaluated their psychometric properties, including responsiveness and reliability in a specialist-managed OAD cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed in-depth interviews with ten OAD patients and ten clinicians to assess their content validity. We administered the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), EQ-5D-5L and two respiratory bolt-on items, (physical impediment, R1 & symptoms, R2) in adult OAD patients at baseline and follow-up visits. We used the baseline data to compare among four EQ-5D versions, EQ-5D-5L, + R1, + R2 & + R1R2: (1) ceiling using individual item responses; and (2) Spearman's rho correlations (R<sub>s</sub>) with SGRQ, (3) association with clinical characteristics using C-statistics from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and (4) coefficient of determination from regression modelling using index/level sum scores. We used the follow-up data to compare intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs)/Cohen's Kappas (κ) of \"stable\" patients; and standardized effect sizes/C-statistics of \"better\" patients using SGRQ and clinical criteria, across the four versions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychometric properties of the respiratory bolt-ons proved to be acceptable. We included 184 patients with a mean age of 54 (standard deviation, 18) years at baseline, and 120 at follow-up at 2.8 (standard deviation, 1.7) months. The ceilings were nullified in + R1, + R2 and + R1R2. Construct validity and responsiveness were consistently higher in + R2 and + R1R2 compared to EQ-5D-5L, while reliability remained comparable among the four versions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respiratory bolt-ons demonstrated good content validity and enhanced the psychometric properties of EQ-5D-5L in OAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"2617-2627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04016-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Two recently developed respiratory bolt-ons were shown to improve the construct validity of EQ-5D-5L among community-treated patients with obstructive airway disease (OAD). We evaluated their psychometric properties, including responsiveness and reliability in a specialist-managed OAD cohort.

Methods: We performed in-depth interviews with ten OAD patients and ten clinicians to assess their content validity. We administered the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), EQ-5D-5L and two respiratory bolt-on items, (physical impediment, R1 & symptoms, R2) in adult OAD patients at baseline and follow-up visits. We used the baseline data to compare among four EQ-5D versions, EQ-5D-5L, + R1, + R2 & + R1R2: (1) ceiling using individual item responses; and (2) Spearman's rho correlations (Rs) with SGRQ, (3) association with clinical characteristics using C-statistics from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and (4) coefficient of determination from regression modelling using index/level sum scores. We used the follow-up data to compare intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs)/Cohen's Kappas (κ) of "stable" patients; and standardized effect sizes/C-statistics of "better" patients using SGRQ and clinical criteria, across the four versions.

Results: Psychometric properties of the respiratory bolt-ons proved to be acceptable. We included 184 patients with a mean age of 54 (standard deviation, 18) years at baseline, and 120 at follow-up at 2.8 (standard deviation, 1.7) months. The ceilings were nullified in + R1, + R2 and + R1R2. Construct validity and responsiveness were consistently higher in + R2 and + R1R2 compared to EQ-5D-5L, while reliability remained comparable among the four versions.

Conclusions: Respiratory bolt-ons demonstrated good content validity and enhanced the psychometric properties of EQ-5D-5L in OAD.

阻塞性气道疾病患者EQ-5D-5L两项呼吸栓接项目的心理测试
目的:最近开发的两种呼吸栓栓被证明可以提高社区治疗的阻塞性气道疾病(OAD)患者EQ-5D-5L的结构效度。我们在专家管理的OAD队列中评估了他们的心理测量特性,包括反应性和可靠性。方法:对10名OAD患者和10名临床医生进行深度访谈,评估其内容效度。我们在基线和随访时对成年OAD患者进行了圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、EQ-5D-5L和两个呼吸附加项目(身体障碍,R1和症状,R2)。我们使用基线数据来比较EQ-5D- 5l、+ R1、+ R2和+ R1R2四个版本的EQ-5D:(1)使用单个项目反应的上限;(2)与SGRQ的Spearman's rho相关性(Rs),(3)与临床特征的相关性,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析的c统计量,以及(4)使用指数/水平和评分的回归模型的决定系数。我们使用随访数据比较“稳定”患者的类内相关系数(ICCs)/Cohen’s Kappas (κ);以及在四个版本中使用SGRQ和临床标准的“较好”患者的标准化效应大小/ c统计。结果:呼吸栓的心理测量特性是可以接受的。我们纳入184例患者,基线时平均年龄为54岁(标准差为18岁),随访2.8个月(标准差为1.7个月)时为120例。天花板在+ R1, + R2和+ R1R2中无效。与EQ-5D-5L相比,+ R2和+ R1R2的结构效度和反应性始终更高,而四个版本之间的信度保持相当。结论:呼吸栓栓具有较好的内容效度,可增强EQ-5D-5L在OAD中的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信