New genetic diagnoses for inherited retinal dystrophies by integrating splicing tools into NGS pipelines.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Elena Fernández-Suárez, María González-Del Pozo, Cristina Méndez-Vidal, Marta Martín-Sánchez, Marcela Mena, Alejandro García-Nuñez, Nereida Bravo-Gil, María José Morillo-Sánchez, Enrique Rodríguez-de la Rúa, Salud Borrego, Guillermo Antiñolo
{"title":"New genetic diagnoses for inherited retinal dystrophies by integrating splicing tools into NGS pipelines.","authors":"Elena Fernández-Suárez, María González-Del Pozo, Cristina Méndez-Vidal, Marta Martín-Sánchez, Marcela Mena, Alejandro García-Nuñez, Nereida Bravo-Gil, María José Morillo-Sánchez, Enrique Rodríguez-de la Rúa, Salud Borrego, Guillermo Antiñolo","doi":"10.1038/s41525-025-00500-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variants affecting pre-mRNA splicing mechanisms are responsible for multiple monogenic disorders. However, their prioritization and interpretation remain challenging. Herein, we designed a strategy for the identification of likely spliceogenic variants in unsolved inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) cases. We benchmarked thirteen splicing predictors on a curated training dataset, which revealed that the combination of SpliceAI and MaxEnt tools exhibited the best performance for the analysis of most splicing variants. However, for branch point variants, the BranchPoint tool (Alamut®-Batch) was the optimal choice. The proposed combination of tools was assessed using a validation cohort comprising 116 genetically diagnosed individuals with rare diseases, and subsequently applied for the analysis of 211 unsolved IRD families. The pipeline identified 30 likely pathogenic variants, 17 of which were predicted to alter splicing mechanisms. These results demonstrate an increase in diagnostic yield of up to 6.2%, reinforcing the importance of reanalysis strategies focused on identifying spliceogenic variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":19273,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-025-00500-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variants affecting pre-mRNA splicing mechanisms are responsible for multiple monogenic disorders. However, their prioritization and interpretation remain challenging. Herein, we designed a strategy for the identification of likely spliceogenic variants in unsolved inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) cases. We benchmarked thirteen splicing predictors on a curated training dataset, which revealed that the combination of SpliceAI and MaxEnt tools exhibited the best performance for the analysis of most splicing variants. However, for branch point variants, the BranchPoint tool (Alamut®-Batch) was the optimal choice. The proposed combination of tools was assessed using a validation cohort comprising 116 genetically diagnosed individuals with rare diseases, and subsequently applied for the analysis of 211 unsolved IRD families. The pipeline identified 30 likely pathogenic variants, 17 of which were predicted to alter splicing mechanisms. These results demonstrate an increase in diagnostic yield of up to 6.2%, reinforcing the importance of reanalysis strategies focused on identifying spliceogenic variants.

将剪接工具整合到NGS管道中的遗传性视网膜营养不良的新基因诊断。
影响前mrna剪接机制的变异是多种单基因疾病的原因。然而,它们的优先级和解释仍然具有挑战性。在此,我们设计了一种策略来识别未解决的遗传性视网膜营养不良(IRD)病例中可能的剪接变异。我们在一个训练数据集上对13个剪接预测器进行了基准测试,结果显示SpliceAI和MaxEnt工具的组合在分析大多数剪接变体方面表现出最佳性能。然而,对于分支点变体,BranchPoint工具(Alamut®-Batch)是最佳选择。使用包含116名罕见病遗传诊断个体的验证队列对拟议的工具组合进行评估,随后应用于分析211个未解决的IRD家族。该管道确定了30种可能的致病变异,其中17种预计会改变剪接机制。这些结果表明,诊断率提高了6.2%,强调了专注于识别剪接变异体的再分析策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Genomic Medicine
NPJ Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
67
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Genomic Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in all aspects of genomics and its application in the practice of medicine. The journal defines genomic medicine as "diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and/or treatment of disease and disorders of the mind and body, using approaches informed or enabled by knowledge of the genome and the molecules it encodes." Relevant and high-impact papers that encompass studies of individuals, families, or populations are considered for publication. An emphasis will include coupling detailed phenotype and genome sequencing information, both enabled by new technologies and informatics, to delineate the underlying aetiology of disease. Clinical recommendations and/or guidelines of how that data should be used in the clinical management of those patients in the study, and others, are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信