Ibukun Owoputi, Lauren San Diego, Xinyi Deng, Tashara M Leak
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs.","authors":"Ibukun Owoputi, Lauren San Diego, Xinyi Deng, Tashara M Leak","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) fruit and vegetable (FV) incentive programs aim to enhance food security and increase FV consumption among low-income United States families. A 2020 scoping review examined their implementation and outcomes, but no updated review has been conducted despite the programs' expansion over the past 5 y.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to provide an updated scoping review characterizing the implementation and outcomes of SNAP FV incentive programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This updated review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and ProQuest Social Science Collection were systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies on FV incentive programs. Out of 4606 articles screened, 55 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies varied by design and included quantitative (n = 39), qualitative (n = 12), and mixed methods (n = 4). Programs were characterized by geographical and retail location type, criteria to earn and redeem incentives, incentive type and incentive amount.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings were summarized in articles by program implementation (participant and stakeholder awareness of program existence and function, redemption rates, and barriers and facilitators to program implementation) and program outcomes (food security, purchase and sales, and consumption). Overall, this review found mostly positive outcomes. For example, in 14/17 studies, FV incentive programs were found to increase FV purchases. In 18/25 studies, participants reported an increase in FV consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued investment in FV incentive programs is critical in supporting SNAP families' nutrition and health. However, rigorous evaluation of long-term FV consumption, particularly in brick-and-mortar stores, is needed to guide program improvement and scaling.</p><p><strong>Scoping review registry: </strong>The protocol for this study was registered in Open Science Framework on 9 April 2024 (https://osf.io/2rk9j) as a scoping review.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.06.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) fruit and vegetable (FV) incentive programs aim to enhance food security and increase FV consumption among low-income United States families. A 2020 scoping review examined their implementation and outcomes, but no updated review has been conducted despite the programs' expansion over the past 5 y.
Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to provide an updated scoping review characterizing the implementation and outcomes of SNAP FV incentive programs in the United States.
Methods: This updated review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and ProQuest Social Science Collection were systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies on FV incentive programs. Out of 4606 articles screened, 55 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies varied by design and included quantitative (n = 39), qualitative (n = 12), and mixed methods (n = 4). Programs were characterized by geographical and retail location type, criteria to earn and redeem incentives, incentive type and incentive amount.
Results: Findings were summarized in articles by program implementation (participant and stakeholder awareness of program existence and function, redemption rates, and barriers and facilitators to program implementation) and program outcomes (food security, purchase and sales, and consumption). Overall, this review found mostly positive outcomes. For example, in 14/17 studies, FV incentive programs were found to increase FV purchases. In 18/25 studies, participants reported an increase in FV consumption.
Conclusions: Continued investment in FV incentive programs is critical in supporting SNAP families' nutrition and health. However, rigorous evaluation of long-term FV consumption, particularly in brick-and-mortar stores, is needed to guide program improvement and scaling.
Scoping review registry: The protocol for this study was registered in Open Science Framework on 9 April 2024 (https://osf.io/2rk9j) as a scoping review.
背景:SNAP水果和蔬菜(FV)奖励计划旨在加强美国低收入家庭的粮食安全,增加FV消费。2020年的范围审查审查了这些项目的实施情况和成果,但尽管这些项目在过去五年中有所扩大,但尚未进行最新审查。目的:本文的目的是提供一个更新的范围审查,描述美国SNAP FV激励计划的实施和结果。方法:这篇更新的综述使用了系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析范围评价指南(PRISMA-ScR)。MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science核心合集、Scopus和ProQuest社会科学合集系统地检索了关于FV激励计划的同行评审研究。在筛选的4606篇文章中,有55篇研究符合纳入标准。研究因设计而异,包括定量(n=39)、定性(n=12)和混合方法(n=4)。计划的特点是地理和零售地点类型、获得和兑换奖励的标准、奖励类型和奖励金额。结果:研究结果通过项目实施(参与者和利益相关者对项目存在和功能的认识、赎回率、项目实施的障碍和促进因素)和项目结果(食品安全、采购和销售以及消费)进行了总结。总的来说,这次审查发现的结果大多是积极的。例如,在14/17项研究中,FV激励计划被发现增加了FV的购买量。在18/25的研究中,参与者报告了FV消耗的增加。结论:继续投资FV激励计划对于支持SNAP家庭的营养和健康至关重要。然而,需要对FV的长期消费进行严格的评估,特别是在实体店,以指导项目的改进和扩大规模。范围审查注册:本研究的方案已于2024年4月9日(https://osf.io/2rk9j)在开放科学框架(OSF)上注册为范围审查。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.