Prevalence, characteristics and management of migraine patients with triptan failure in primary care: the EMR France-Mig study.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M Lanteri-Minet, C Casarotto, O Bretin, C Collin, M Gugenheim, V Raclot, A Cases, P A Squara, W Aissani, A Saighi, H Lefebvre
{"title":"Prevalence, characteristics and management of migraine patients with triptan failure in primary care: the EMR France-Mig study.","authors":"M Lanteri-Minet, C Casarotto, O Bretin, C Collin, M Gugenheim, V Raclot, A Cases, P A Squara, W Aissani, A Saighi, H Lefebvre","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02086-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most used treatments for migraine attacks are triptans, yet a considerable proportion of the population develops treatment failure over time due to ineffectiveness, side effects, and/or contraindications. The aim of the France-Mig study was to quantify the population with triptan failure due to ineligibility or resistance, in the primary care setting, and describe their therapeutic management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The France-Mig study was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients suffering from migraine in 2022 identified using data from the IQVIA electronic medical records (EMR). Patients were identified using either a migraine diagnosis (ICD-10 G43) or a prescription for migraine-specific drugs. Triptan failure was defined as patients with triptan ineligibility (having a contraindication listed in the summary of product characteristics of triptan or aged over 65 years old) or triptan resistance (unsuccessful intake of two different triptans, following the 2022 European Headache Federation consensus definition).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16,888 adult patients with migraine diagnosis or migraine-specific treatment prescribed in 2022 and with at least 5 years of look back period were included (after extrapolation, it was estimated that 1,440,169 adults consulted a general practitioner in primary care for migraine in 2022 in metropolitan France, which corresponds to 2.78% of the French population). Among the 16,888 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, 4,509 (26.7%) were identified as having triptan failure, including 4,024 (23.8%) ineligible patients (1,364 [8.1%] with cardiovascular contraindications for triptans, 700 [4.1%] with non-cardiovascular contraindications, 2,055 [12.2%] with age superior or equal to 65 years) and 604 (3.6%) with triptan resistance. A total of 1,384 (53.9%) patients with ineligibility were prescribed a triptan (after their ineligibility). Among patients with triptan resistance, 273 (45.2%) were prescribed at least 3 different triptan molecules and 41 (6.8%) were prescribed at least 4 different triptan molecules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triptans failed in more than a quarter of patients. The high proportion of patients treated with triptan despite contraindication showed a substantial unmet therapeutic need, warranting further research and tailored approaches to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02086-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The most used treatments for migraine attacks are triptans, yet a considerable proportion of the population develops treatment failure over time due to ineffectiveness, side effects, and/or contraindications. The aim of the France-Mig study was to quantify the population with triptan failure due to ineligibility or resistance, in the primary care setting, and describe their therapeutic management.

Methods: The France-Mig study was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients suffering from migraine in 2022 identified using data from the IQVIA electronic medical records (EMR). Patients were identified using either a migraine diagnosis (ICD-10 G43) or a prescription for migraine-specific drugs. Triptan failure was defined as patients with triptan ineligibility (having a contraindication listed in the summary of product characteristics of triptan or aged over 65 years old) or triptan resistance (unsuccessful intake of two different triptans, following the 2022 European Headache Federation consensus definition).

Results: A total of 16,888 adult patients with migraine diagnosis or migraine-specific treatment prescribed in 2022 and with at least 5 years of look back period were included (after extrapolation, it was estimated that 1,440,169 adults consulted a general practitioner in primary care for migraine in 2022 in metropolitan France, which corresponds to 2.78% of the French population). Among the 16,888 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, 4,509 (26.7%) were identified as having triptan failure, including 4,024 (23.8%) ineligible patients (1,364 [8.1%] with cardiovascular contraindications for triptans, 700 [4.1%] with non-cardiovascular contraindications, 2,055 [12.2%] with age superior or equal to 65 years) and 604 (3.6%) with triptan resistance. A total of 1,384 (53.9%) patients with ineligibility were prescribed a triptan (after their ineligibility). Among patients with triptan resistance, 273 (45.2%) were prescribed at least 3 different triptan molecules and 41 (6.8%) were prescribed at least 4 different triptan molecules.

Conclusions: Triptans failed in more than a quarter of patients. The high proportion of patients treated with triptan despite contraindication showed a substantial unmet therapeutic need, warranting further research and tailored approaches to improve patient outcomes.

初级保健中曲坦类药物失效偏头痛患者的患病率、特征和管理:EMR法国-米格研究
背景:偏头痛发作最常用的治疗方法是曲坦类药物,但由于无效、副作用和/或禁忌症,相当一部分人的治疗随着时间的推移而失败。法国-米格研究的目的是量化在初级保健环境中由于不合格或抵抗而导致曲坦类药物失效的人群,并描述他们的治疗管理。方法:France-Mig研究是对2022年偏头痛患者队列的回顾性分析,该队列使用IQVIA电子医疗记录(EMR)的数据确定。通过偏头痛诊断(ICD-10 G43)或偏头痛特异性药物处方来确定患者。曲坦类药物治疗失败的定义为曲坦类药物不适合(在曲坦类药物的产品特征摘要中列出了禁忌症,或年龄超过65岁)或曲坦类药物耐药(根据2022年欧洲头痛联合会的共识定义,摄入两种不同的曲坦类药物失败)的患者。结果:共有16,888名偏头痛诊断或偏头痛特异性治疗的成年患者在2022年被纳入,并且至少有5年的回顾期(经过外推,估计在2022年法国大都市有1,440,169名成年人在偏头痛的初级保健中咨询了全科医生,相当于法国人口的2.78%)。在符合纳入标准的16,888例患者中,4,509例(26.7%)被确定为曲坦类药物失效,包括4,024例(23.8%)不符合条件的患者(1,364例(8.1%)有曲坦类药物的心血管禁忌症,700例(4.1%)有非心血管禁忌症,2,055例(12.2%)年龄大于或等于65岁)和604例(3.6%)曲坦类药物耐药。共有1384例(53.9%)不符合用药条件的患者(在不符合用药条件后)服用曲坦类药物。在曲坦耐药患者中,273例(45.2%)使用了至少3种曲坦类药物,41例(6.8%)使用了至少4种曲坦类药物。结论:曲坦类药物在超过四分之一的患者中无效。尽管有禁忌症,但仍有高比例的患者接受曲坦治疗,这表明治疗需求仍未得到充分满足,需要进一步研究和量身定制的方法来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信