Survival of Generic Escherichia coli on Plastic Mulch in Open-Field, Greenhouse, and Growth Chamber Environments

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Alyssa A. Rosenbaum , Claire M. Murphy , Alexis M. Hamilton , Steven L. Rideout , Laura K. Strawn
{"title":"Survival of Generic Escherichia coli on Plastic Mulch in Open-Field, Greenhouse, and Growth Chamber Environments","authors":"Alyssa A. Rosenbaum ,&nbsp;Claire M. Murphy ,&nbsp;Alexis M. Hamilton ,&nbsp;Steven L. Rideout ,&nbsp;Laura K. Strawn","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plasticulture, the use of plastic mulch to control pests and enhance plant growth, is common in fresh produce production. Given that fruits and vegetables may come into direct or indirect contact with plastic mulch, assessing potential food safety risks associated with contaminated plastic mulch is needed. This study evaluated the survival of generic <em>Escherichia coli</em> on plastic mulch across three environments. Plastic mulch was cut into 100 × 15 mm coupons, placed in Petri dishes, and spot inoculated with 100 µL of green fluorescent protein-tagged generic <em>E. coli</em> (ca. 6 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>). After drying for 90 min, coupons were held in three different environments: open-field, greenhouse, or growth chamber. Samples were collected at 0, 0.06, 0.17, 0.41, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 d postinoculation (dpi) and enriched if counts were below the detection limit (&lt;0.12 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>). All <em>E. coli</em> counts were confirmed by fluorescence. The reduction of <em>E. coli</em> on plastic mulch differed significantly by environment (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). In the open-field, <em>E. coli</em> was reduced by &gt;6 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> within 0.17 dpi (4 h) and was undetectable by enrichment on 5 dpi. In the greenhouse, a 6 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> reduction was also achieved; however, <em>E. coli</em> remained detectable up to 7 dpi. In the growth chamber, <em>E. coli</em> persisted at 4.0 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> up to 7 dpi. <em>E. coli</em> demonstrated a die-off rate of −1.65 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>/h from 0 to 4 h in the open-field, compared to −0.21 and −0.01 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>/h from 0 to 3 h and 3 h onward, respectively, in the growth chamber. These results demonstrate that the survival of <em>E. coli</em> on plastic mulch is environment-dependent, indicating that not all production environments have the same risk. Field and greenhouse environments should also be included and prioritized in produce safety research as the laboratory-based experiment overestimated risk in the present study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 9","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasticulture, the use of plastic mulch to control pests and enhance plant growth, is common in fresh produce production. Given that fruits and vegetables may come into direct or indirect contact with plastic mulch, assessing potential food safety risks associated with contaminated plastic mulch is needed. This study evaluated the survival of generic Escherichia coli on plastic mulch across three environments. Plastic mulch was cut into 100 × 15 mm coupons, placed in Petri dishes, and spot inoculated with 100 µL of green fluorescent protein-tagged generic E. coli (ca. 6 log CFU/cm2). After drying for 90 min, coupons were held in three different environments: open-field, greenhouse, or growth chamber. Samples were collected at 0, 0.06, 0.17, 0.41, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 d postinoculation (dpi) and enriched if counts were below the detection limit (<0.12 log CFU/cm2). All E. coli counts were confirmed by fluorescence. The reduction of E. coli on plastic mulch differed significantly by environment (p < 0.05). In the open-field, E. coli was reduced by >6 log CFU/cm2 within 0.17 dpi (4 h) and was undetectable by enrichment on 5 dpi. In the greenhouse, a 6 log CFU/cm2 reduction was also achieved; however, E. coli remained detectable up to 7 dpi. In the growth chamber, E. coli persisted at 4.0 log CFU/cm2 up to 7 dpi. E. coli demonstrated a die-off rate of −1.65 log CFU/cm2/h from 0 to 4 h in the open-field, compared to −0.21 and −0.01 log CFU/cm2/h from 0 to 3 h and 3 h onward, respectively, in the growth chamber. These results demonstrate that the survival of E. coli on plastic mulch is environment-dependent, indicating that not all production environments have the same risk. Field and greenhouse environments should also be included and prioritized in produce safety research as the laboratory-based experiment overestimated risk in the present study.
通用大肠杆菌在露天、温室和生长室环境下在地膜上的存活。
塑料栽培,即使用塑料覆盖物来控制害虫和促进植物生长,在新鲜农产品生产中很常见。鉴于水果和蔬菜可能直接或间接接触地膜,有必要评估受污染地膜相关的潜在食品安全风险。本研究评估了三种环境下普通大肠杆菌在塑料地膜上的存活率。将塑料覆盖物切成100 × 15 mm片状,置于培养皿中,用100µL绿色荧光蛋白标记的通用大肠杆菌(约6 log CFU/cm2)进行斑点接种。干燥90分钟后,将叶片放置在三种不同的环境中:露天、温室或生长室。接种后0、0.06、0.17、0.41、1、2、3、5和7 d采集样品,计数低于检出限时进行富集(2)。所有大肠杆菌计数均用荧光法确认。在0.17 dpi (4 h)范围内,不同环境对大肠杆菌的减少差异显著(p6 log CFU/cm2),而在5 dpi范围内,大肠杆菌的富集未检测到。在温室中,也实现了6 log CFU/cm2的减少;然而,大肠杆菌仍可检测到高达7 dpi。在生长室中,大肠杆菌以4.0 log CFU/cm2的速度持续到7 dpi。大肠杆菌在野外0 - 4小时的死亡率为-1.65 log CFU/cm2/小时,而在生长室内0 - 3小时和3小时后的死亡率分别为-0.21和-0.01 log CFU/cm2/小时。这些结果表明,大肠杆菌在地膜上的存活是环境依赖的,表明并非所有的生产环境都具有相同的风险。由于目前研究中实验室实验高估了风险,应将田间和温室环境纳入生产安全研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信