Jackson Cabo, Daiwei Lu, Chase Floyd, Tatsuki Koyama, Ipek Oguz, Nicholas Kavoussi
{"title":"The Evaluation of Computer Vision-Based Automated Performance Metrics for Endoscopic Kidney Stone Surgery.","authors":"Jackson Cabo, Daiwei Lu, Chase Floyd, Tatsuki Koyama, Ipek Oguz, Nicholas Kavoussi","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The assessment of surgical competency is essential for clinical training and safety. No objective, real-time tools exist to evaluate competency during endoscopic stone operation. We sought to apply endoscopic computer vision models to define automated performance metrics (APMs) from videos of flexible ureteroscopy. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We assessed three APMs for endoscopic treatment of kidney stones, including percentage of frames without stone visibility, screen occupancy by stone, and frame-to-frame change in stone occupancy. Surgical videos of a surgeon performing either stone localization or stone ablation were recorded. Using our previously validated computer vision model for endoscopic stone segmentation, APMs were compared between experts (fellowship-trained endourologists) and trainees. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-six videos, including 28 of stone localization and 18 of stone laser ablation, were analyzed from nine surgeons (three experts and six trainees). During stone localization, trainee videos had a higher percentage of frames without visible stone (4% <i>vs</i> 27%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and lower screen occupancy by stone (5% <i>vs</i> 14%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) compared with expert videos. During laser ablation, trainee videos had a higher frame-to-frame change in stone occupancy (3% <i>vs</i> 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) compared with expert videos. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> APMs from computer vision methods differ between expert and trainee surgical videos of endoscopic kidney stone treatment. These metrics could be used to objectively assess skill evaluation and acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"924-929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The assessment of surgical competency is essential for clinical training and safety. No objective, real-time tools exist to evaluate competency during endoscopic stone operation. We sought to apply endoscopic computer vision models to define automated performance metrics (APMs) from videos of flexible ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We assessed three APMs for endoscopic treatment of kidney stones, including percentage of frames without stone visibility, screen occupancy by stone, and frame-to-frame change in stone occupancy. Surgical videos of a surgeon performing either stone localization or stone ablation were recorded. Using our previously validated computer vision model for endoscopic stone segmentation, APMs were compared between experts (fellowship-trained endourologists) and trainees. Results: Forty-six videos, including 28 of stone localization and 18 of stone laser ablation, were analyzed from nine surgeons (three experts and six trainees). During stone localization, trainee videos had a higher percentage of frames without visible stone (4% vs 27%, p < 0.01) and lower screen occupancy by stone (5% vs 14%, p = 0.03) compared with expert videos. During laser ablation, trainee videos had a higher frame-to-frame change in stone occupancy (3% vs 2%, p < 0.01) compared with expert videos. Conclusions: APMs from computer vision methods differ between expert and trainee surgical videos of endoscopic kidney stone treatment. These metrics could be used to objectively assess skill evaluation and acquisition.
背景:外科手术能力评估对临床培训和安全至关重要。没有客观的、实时的工具来评估内镜下结石手术的能力。我们试图应用内窥镜计算机视觉模型来定义柔性输尿管镜视频的自动性能指标(APMs)。材料和方法:我们评估了三种APMs用于肾结石的内镜治疗,包括无结石可见的镜框百分比、结石占用屏幕的比例以及镜框间结石占用的变化。记录外科医生进行结石定位或结石消融的手术视频。使用我们之前验证的计算机视觉模型进行内镜结石分割,比较专家(研究员培训的腔内科医生)和实习生之间的APMs。结果:对9名外科医生(3名专家,6名学员)的46段视频进行分析,其中结石定位视频28段,结石激光消融视频18段。在结石定位过程中,与专家视频相比,培训视频中没有可见结石的帧比例更高(4%对27%,p < 0.01),而结石的屏幕占用率更低(5%对14%,p = 0.03)。在激光消融过程中,与专家视频相比,练习生视频中结石占用率的帧间变化更高(3% vs 2%, p < 0.01)。结论:内窥镜肾结石治疗的专家和学员手术视频的计算机视觉图像存在差异。这些指标可以用来客观地评估技能评估和获取。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.