Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ella Liu, Sherri Lee Jones, Victoria Light, Charlotte Teunissen, Arabella Bouzigues, Lucy L Russell, Phoebe H Foster, Eve Ferry-Bolder, John C van Swieten, Lize C Jiskoot, Harro Seelaar, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Daniela Galimberti, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Pietro Tiraboschi, Isabel Santana, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Sandro Sorbi, Markus Otto, Chris R Butler, Isabelle Le Ber, Elizabeth Finger, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Mario Masellis, James B Rowe, Matthis Synofzik, Fermin Moreno, Barbara Borroni, Henrik Zetterberg, Jonathan D Rohrer, Simon Ducharme
{"title":"Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders.","authors":"Ella Liu, Sherri Lee Jones, Victoria Light, Charlotte Teunissen, Arabella Bouzigues, Lucy L Russell, Phoebe H Foster, Eve Ferry-Bolder, John C van Swieten, Lize C Jiskoot, Harro Seelaar, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Daniela Galimberti, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Pietro Tiraboschi, Isabel Santana, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Sandro Sorbi, Markus Otto, Chris R Butler, Isabelle Le Ber, Elizabeth Finger, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Mario Masellis, James B Rowe, Matthis Synofzik, Fermin Moreno, Barbara Borroni, Henrik Zetterberg, Jonathan D Rohrer, Simon Ducharme","doi":"10.1177/13872877251352103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGenetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) along with Alzheimer's disease (AD), is one of the most prevalent early-onset dementias. The differential diagnosis of FTD from primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) has been challenging due to significant symptom overlap, particular as FTD often presents with prolonged psychiatric prodromes.ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate whether blood-based neurofilament light chain (NfL) can differentiate genetic FTD from PPD, and to determine a global clinical cutoff to differentiate genetic FTD carriers from PPD with high specificity and sensitivity.MethodsData (ages 40-81) were obtained from FTD mutation carriers (GENFI; <i>n</i> = 474; <i>n</i> = 120 <i>C9orf72, n</i> <i>=</i> 114 <i>GRN, n</i> = 50 <i>MAPT</i>, <i>n</i> = 190 controls), and PPD (Biobanque Signature; <i>n</i> = 848). Blood-based NfL was measured with SIMOA HD-X (BbS) and SIMOA HD-1 (GENFI).ResultsBlood-based NfL was higher in all symptomatic mutations compared to PPD. Mildly symptomatic (0 < FTLD CDR-SOB-NM < 4) <i>C9orf72</i> and <i>GRN</i> carriers also had higher NfL. ROC curve revealed an optimal blood-based NfL cutoff of 22.1 pg/mL (<i>J</i> = 0.647) to distinguish symptomatic genetic FTD from PPD (78.5% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity, AUC = 0.908). For mildly symptomatic subjects, a cutoff of 16.2 pg/mL (<i>J</i> = 0.601) differentiated groups with 86.7% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity (AUC = 0.870).ConclusionsNfL holds potential as a blood-based biomarker for symptomatic genetic FTD carriers, with moderate accuracy to distinguish PPD from mild forms including <i>C9orf72</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251352103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251352103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundGenetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) along with Alzheimer's disease (AD), is one of the most prevalent early-onset dementias. The differential diagnosis of FTD from primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) has been challenging due to significant symptom overlap, particular as FTD often presents with prolonged psychiatric prodromes.ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate whether blood-based neurofilament light chain (NfL) can differentiate genetic FTD from PPD, and to determine a global clinical cutoff to differentiate genetic FTD carriers from PPD with high specificity and sensitivity.MethodsData (ages 40-81) were obtained from FTD mutation carriers (GENFI; n = 474; n = 120 C9orf72, n= 114 GRN, n = 50 MAPT, n = 190 controls), and PPD (Biobanque Signature; n = 848). Blood-based NfL was measured with SIMOA HD-X (BbS) and SIMOA HD-1 (GENFI).ResultsBlood-based NfL was higher in all symptomatic mutations compared to PPD. Mildly symptomatic (0 < FTLD CDR-SOB-NM < 4) C9orf72 and GRN carriers also had higher NfL. ROC curve revealed an optimal blood-based NfL cutoff of 22.1 pg/mL (J = 0.647) to distinguish symptomatic genetic FTD from PPD (78.5% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity, AUC = 0.908). For mildly symptomatic subjects, a cutoff of 16.2 pg/mL (J = 0.601) differentiated groups with 86.7% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity (AUC = 0.870).ConclusionsNfL holds potential as a blood-based biomarker for symptomatic genetic FTD carriers, with moderate accuracy to distinguish PPD from mild forms including C9orf72.

基于血液的神经丝光对不同遗传性额颞叶痴呆与原发性精神疾病的准确性。
背景:遗传性额颞叶痴呆(FTD)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的早发性痴呆之一。由于明显的症状重叠,特别是FTD经常表现出长期的精神前驱症状,因此FTD与原发性精神障碍(PPD)的鉴别诊断一直具有挑战性。目的本研究旨在评估血源性神经丝轻链(NfL)能否区分遗传性FTD与PPD,并确定一个具有高特异性和敏感性的区分遗传性FTD携带者与PPD的全球临床临界值。方法数据(40-81岁)来自FTD突变携带者(GENFI;n = 474;n = 120 C9orf72, n = 114 GRN, n = 50 MAPT, n = 190对照)和PPD (Biobanque Signature;n = 848)。采用SIMOA HD-X (BbS)和SIMOA HD-1 (GENFI)测定血源性NfL。结果与PPD相比,血液基础的NfL在所有症状突变中均较高。轻度症状(0 C9orf72)和GRN携带者也有较高的NfL。ROC曲线显示,区分症状性遗传性FTD和PPD的最佳血液NfL截止值为22.1 pg/mL (J = 0.647)(敏感性78.5%,特异性86.2%,AUC = 0.908)。对于轻度症状的受试者,临界值为16.2 pg/mL (J = 0.601),敏感性为86.7%,特异性为73.5% (AUC = 0.870)。结论snfl具有作为有症状的遗传性FTD携带者的血液生物标志物的潜力,在区分PPD与轻度形式(包括C9orf72)方面具有中等准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信