Implementing a Cross-Border Next-Generation Personal Health Record in the Philippines and Taiwan: An Implementation Case Report Using Health Level 7 International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hsiu-An Lee, Jui-Chun Huang, Shih-Wun Huang, Wei-Han Chen, Alvin B Marcelo, Miguel Sandino O Aljibe, Chien-Yeh Hsu
{"title":"Implementing a Cross-Border Next-Generation Personal Health Record in the Philippines and Taiwan: An Implementation Case Report Using Health Level 7 International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources.","authors":"Hsiu-An Lee, Jui-Chun Huang, Shih-Wun Huang, Wei-Han Chen, Alvin B Marcelo, Miguel Sandino O Aljibe, Chien-Yeh Hsu","doi":"10.2196/56272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in electronic health record systems hinder cross-border continuity of care, particularly where labor mobility and tourism intersect (eg, between the Philippines and Taiwan). Both nations collect claim data, yet neither fully aligns with international standards such as the Health Level 7 International, International Patient Summary (IPS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This implementation report aimed to convert health insurance data from Taiwan's My Health Bank (MHB) and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation's Claim Form 4 (CF4) into a cross-border personal health record (PHR) aligned with the IPS using (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) FHIR standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mapped each data element from CF4 (n=7 main sections) and MHB (n=12 major data items) to 17 sections of the IPS. We analyzed whether these elements matched IPS requirements (required or recommended or optional) and identified missing fields (eg, device use, social history, and advanced directives). We also designed a FHIR-based integration architecture, addressing system security with OAuth 2.0/SMART on FHIR and proposing a national uptake strategy for accelerating cross-border PHR implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 17 IPS sections, MHB covered 14 sections (82.4%), while CF4 covered 12 sections (70.6%). Both systems lacked sufficient data elements for medical devices, social history (eg, alcohol or tobacco), and advanced directives. We developed an implementation plan focusing on data interoperability, standardization, and privacy or security protocols. We propose a multiphase approach-beginning with the stakeholder engagement and pilot testing in both countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aligning CF4 and MHB data with IPS standards via FHIR can facilitate a robust cross-border next-generation PHR ecosystem. This approach may enhance patient safety, continuity of care, and policy development for the Philippines and Taiwan. Further collaboration, regulatory updates, and public awareness are vital to sustain integration and maximize patient benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e56272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disparities in electronic health record systems hinder cross-border continuity of care, particularly where labor mobility and tourism intersect (eg, between the Philippines and Taiwan). Both nations collect claim data, yet neither fully aligns with international standards such as the Health Level 7 International, International Patient Summary (IPS).

Objective: This implementation report aimed to convert health insurance data from Taiwan's My Health Bank (MHB) and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation's Claim Form 4 (CF4) into a cross-border personal health record (PHR) aligned with the IPS using (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) FHIR standards.

Methods: We mapped each data element from CF4 (n=7 main sections) and MHB (n=12 major data items) to 17 sections of the IPS. We analyzed whether these elements matched IPS requirements (required or recommended or optional) and identified missing fields (eg, device use, social history, and advanced directives). We also designed a FHIR-based integration architecture, addressing system security with OAuth 2.0/SMART on FHIR and proposing a national uptake strategy for accelerating cross-border PHR implementation.

Results: Of the 17 IPS sections, MHB covered 14 sections (82.4%), while CF4 covered 12 sections (70.6%). Both systems lacked sufficient data elements for medical devices, social history (eg, alcohol or tobacco), and advanced directives. We developed an implementation plan focusing on data interoperability, standardization, and privacy or security protocols. We propose a multiphase approach-beginning with the stakeholder engagement and pilot testing in both countries.

Conclusions: Aligning CF4 and MHB data with IPS standards via FHIR can facilitate a robust cross-border next-generation PHR ecosystem. This approach may enhance patient safety, continuity of care, and policy development for the Philippines and Taiwan. Further collaboration, regulatory updates, and public awareness are vital to sustain integration and maximize patient benefits.

在菲律宾和台湾实施跨境下一代个人健康记录:使用Health Level 7国际快速医疗互操作性资源的实施案例报告。
背景:电子健康记录系统的差异阻碍了跨境护理的连续性,特别是在劳动力流动和旅游相交的地方(例如菲律宾和台湾之间)。这两个国家都收集索赔数据,但都不完全符合国际标准,如国际健康等级7,国际患者摘要(IPS)。目的:本实施报告旨在使用(快速医疗互操作性资源)FHIR标准,将台湾“我的健康银行”(MHB)和菲律宾健康保险公司的索赔表4 (CF4)中的医疗保险数据转换为符合IPS的跨境个人健康记录(PHR)。方法:将CF4 (n=7个主要部分)和MHB (n=12个主要数据项)的每个数据元素映射到IPS的17个部分。我们分析了这些元素是否符合IPS要求(必需的、推荐的或可选的),并确定了缺失的字段(例如,设备使用、社会历史和高级指令)。我们还设计了一个基于FHIR的集成架构,通过OAuth 2.0/SMART解决了FHIR上的系统安全问题,并提出了加快跨境PHR实施的国家采用战略。结果:17张IPS切片中,MHB占14张(82.4%),CF4占12张(70.6%)。这两个系统都缺乏足够的医疗器械、社会历史(如酒精或烟草)和高级指令的数据元素。我们制定了一个实现计划,重点关注数据互操作性、标准化以及隐私或安全协议。我们建议采取一种多阶段的方法——首先是利益相关者的参与,然后在两国进行试点测试。结论:通过FHIR将CF4和MHB数据与IPS标准相一致,可以促进构建强大的跨境下一代PHR生态系统。这种方法可以提高菲律宾和台湾的患者安全、护理的连续性和政策的制定。进一步的合作、法规更新和公众意识对于维持整合和最大化患者利益至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信