Comparison of the efficacy of Philos plate and Multiloc intramedullary nail in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures with osteoporosis in the elderly.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1606898
Qian Liu, Zongbing Cao, Jing Liu, Zhiyong Liu, Wenbo Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of Philos plate and Multiloc intramedullary nail in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures with osteoporosis in the elderly.","authors":"Qian Liu, Zongbing Cao, Jing Liu, Zhiyong Liu, Wenbo Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1606898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal humeral fractures are common in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Complex three- or four-part fractures often require surgical intervention. Philos locking plates and Multiloc intramedullary nails are widely used, but their comparative effectiveness in osteoporotic elderly patients remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed on 90 elderly patients (aged 70-95 years) with Neer three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures treated between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients received either Philos plate fixation (<i>n</i> = 50) or Multiloc intramedullary nail fixation (<i>n</i> = 40). Clinical data included incision length, operative time, blood loss, complications, and functional outcomes. Pain was assessed via VAS, and shoulder function via Constant-Murley scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved fracture healing and functional improvement. Compared to the Philos group, the Multiloc group had shorter incisions, less blood loss, and shorter operative time (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). VAS scores were lower and Constant-Murley scores higher in the Multiloc group at all time points (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Complication rates were lower in the Multiloc group (10% vs. 20%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Both techniques are effective, but Multiloc intramedullary nail fixation offers superior early outcomes and fewer complications. It may be preferable for elderly patients with osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures when proper surgical technique is ensured.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1606898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1606898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proximal humeral fractures are common in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Complex three- or four-part fractures often require surgical intervention. Philos locking plates and Multiloc intramedullary nails are widely used, but their comparative effectiveness in osteoporotic elderly patients remains uncertain.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 90 elderly patients (aged 70-95 years) with Neer three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures treated between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients received either Philos plate fixation (n = 50) or Multiloc intramedullary nail fixation (n = 40). Clinical data included incision length, operative time, blood loss, complications, and functional outcomes. Pain was assessed via VAS, and shoulder function via Constant-Murley scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: Both groups achieved fracture healing and functional improvement. Compared to the Philos group, the Multiloc group had shorter incisions, less blood loss, and shorter operative time (all P < 0.05). VAS scores were lower and Constant-Murley scores higher in the Multiloc group at all time points (P < 0.05). Complication rates were lower in the Multiloc group (10% vs. 20%).

Discussion: Both techniques are effective, but Multiloc intramedullary nail fixation offers superior early outcomes and fewer complications. It may be preferable for elderly patients with osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures when proper surgical technique is ensured.

Philos钢板与Multiloc髓内钉治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折合并骨质疏松症的疗效比较。
肱骨近端骨折在老年骨质疏松患者中很常见。复杂的三段或四段骨折通常需要手术干预。Philos锁定钢板和Multiloc髓内钉被广泛应用,但它们在老年骨质疏松患者中的相对疗效尚不确定。方法:回顾性研究了90例老年患者(70-95岁)在2021年1月至2023年12月期间从未治疗过肱骨近端三段或四段骨折。患者接受Philos钢板固定(n = 50)或Multiloc髓内钉固定(n = 40)。临床资料包括切口长度、手术时间、出血量、并发症和功能结局。术后1周、1个月和12个月,通过VAS评估疼痛,通过Constant-Murley评分评估肩部功能。结果:两组均获得骨折愈合和功能改善。与Philos组相比,Multiloc组切口更短,出血量更少,手术时间更短(均为P)讨论:两种技术都是有效的,但Multiloc髓内钉固定提供了更好的早期结果和更少的并发症。对于老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折患者,在适当的手术技术保证下,可优先使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信