Utility of Individual Neurocognitive Domains of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale to Detect Cognitive Impairment in an Urban Illiterate Population.
Nilton Custodio, Marco Malaga, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Rosa Montesinos, Diego Bustamante-Paytan, Fiorella Baca-Seminario, Juan Carlos Carbajal, Jose Carlos Huilca, David Lira, Junior Senador, Eder Herrera-Perez, Monica M Diaz, Serggio Lanata, Jorge O Alarcon
{"title":"Utility of Individual Neurocognitive Domains of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale to Detect Cognitive Impairment in an Urban Illiterate Population.","authors":"Nilton Custodio, Marco Malaga, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Rosa Montesinos, Diego Bustamante-Paytan, Fiorella Baca-Seminario, Juan Carlos Carbajal, Jose Carlos Huilca, David Lira, Junior Senador, Eder Herrera-Perez, Monica M Diaz, Serggio Lanata, Jorge O Alarcon","doi":"10.1159/000546517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brief cognitive tests like the RUDAS are useful for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, especially in low-literacy populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of the RUDAS by subdomains to detect MCI and dementia in illiterate individuals in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of randomly selected illiterate individuals, recruited for validation of RUDAS in Lima, Peru. We compared the RUDAS domain and total scores to a battery of neuropsychological tests (FDS, BDS, ROCF, MINT and Craft 21) using a Spearman correlation coefficient. For diagnostic performance, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for each RUDAS domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 187 patients (64 controls, 60 MCI, and 63 dementia patients). Average RUDAS score was 23.87 ± 0.93, 20.43 ± 1.39, and 14.97 ± 2.21, respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups for all domains, except for ideomotor praxis and visuo-spatial praxis. For convergent validity, most significant correlations from the bivariate analysis remained in the age-adjusted regression, particularly for praxis, memory, and judgment. The total RUDAS score had an AUC of 98% (95% CI: 96-100%) for both MCI and dementia, by domains, judgment, verbal fluency, and memory AUC ranging from 0.7 to 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed the RUDAS domains of visuo-spatial orientation and memory had an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of dementia. However, further research is needed to validate the use of individual RUDAS items for assessing specific cognitive domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Brief cognitive tests like the RUDAS are useful for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, especially in low-literacy populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of the RUDAS by subdomains to detect MCI and dementia in illiterate individuals in Lima, Peru.
Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of randomly selected illiterate individuals, recruited for validation of RUDAS in Lima, Peru. We compared the RUDAS domain and total scores to a battery of neuropsychological tests (FDS, BDS, ROCF, MINT and Craft 21) using a Spearman correlation coefficient. For diagnostic performance, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for each RUDAS domain.
Results: We included 187 patients (64 controls, 60 MCI, and 63 dementia patients). Average RUDAS score was 23.87 ± 0.93, 20.43 ± 1.39, and 14.97 ± 2.21, respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups for all domains, except for ideomotor praxis and visuo-spatial praxis. For convergent validity, most significant correlations from the bivariate analysis remained in the age-adjusted regression, particularly for praxis, memory, and judgment. The total RUDAS score had an AUC of 98% (95% CI: 96-100%) for both MCI and dementia, by domains, judgment, verbal fluency, and memory AUC ranging from 0.7 to 0.8.
Conclusions: Our study showed the RUDAS domains of visuo-spatial orientation and memory had an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of dementia. However, further research is needed to validate the use of individual RUDAS items for assessing specific cognitive domains.
期刊介绍:
As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.