Utility of Individual Neurocognitive Domains of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale to Detect Cognitive Impairment in an Urban Illiterate Population.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nilton Custodio, Marco Malaga, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Rosa Montesinos, Diego Bustamante-Paytan, Fiorella Baca-Seminario, Juan Carlos Carbajal, Jose Carlos Huilca, David Lira, Junior Senador, Eder Herrera-Perez, Monica M Diaz, Serggio Lanata, Jorge O Alarcon
{"title":"Utility of Individual Neurocognitive Domains of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale to Detect Cognitive Impairment in an Urban Illiterate Population.","authors":"Nilton Custodio, Marco Malaga, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Rosa Montesinos, Diego Bustamante-Paytan, Fiorella Baca-Seminario, Juan Carlos Carbajal, Jose Carlos Huilca, David Lira, Junior Senador, Eder Herrera-Perez, Monica M Diaz, Serggio Lanata, Jorge O Alarcon","doi":"10.1159/000546517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brief cognitive tests like the RUDAS are useful for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, especially in low-literacy populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of the RUDAS by subdomains to detect MCI and dementia in illiterate individuals in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of randomly selected illiterate individuals, recruited for validation of RUDAS in Lima, Peru. We compared the RUDAS domain and total scores to a battery of neuropsychological tests (FDS, BDS, ROCF, MINT and Craft 21) using a Spearman correlation coefficient. For diagnostic performance, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for each RUDAS domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 187 patients (64 controls, 60 MCI, and 63 dementia patients). Average RUDAS score was 23.87 ± 0.93, 20.43 ± 1.39, and 14.97 ± 2.21, respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups for all domains, except for ideomotor praxis and visuo-spatial praxis. For convergent validity, most significant correlations from the bivariate analysis remained in the age-adjusted regression, particularly for praxis, memory, and judgment. The total RUDAS score had an AUC of 98% (95% CI: 96-100%) for both MCI and dementia, by domains, judgment, verbal fluency, and memory AUC ranging from 0.7 to 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed the RUDAS domains of visuo-spatial orientation and memory had an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of dementia. However, further research is needed to validate the use of individual RUDAS items for assessing specific cognitive domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Brief cognitive tests like the RUDAS are useful for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, especially in low-literacy populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of the RUDAS by subdomains to detect MCI and dementia in illiterate individuals in Lima, Peru.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of randomly selected illiterate individuals, recruited for validation of RUDAS in Lima, Peru. We compared the RUDAS domain and total scores to a battery of neuropsychological tests (FDS, BDS, ROCF, MINT and Craft 21) using a Spearman correlation coefficient. For diagnostic performance, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for each RUDAS domain.

Results: We included 187 patients (64 controls, 60 MCI, and 63 dementia patients). Average RUDAS score was 23.87 ± 0.93, 20.43 ± 1.39, and 14.97 ± 2.21, respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups for all domains, except for ideomotor praxis and visuo-spatial praxis. For convergent validity, most significant correlations from the bivariate analysis remained in the age-adjusted regression, particularly for praxis, memory, and judgment. The total RUDAS score had an AUC of 98% (95% CI: 96-100%) for both MCI and dementia, by domains, judgment, verbal fluency, and memory AUC ranging from 0.7 to 0.8.

Conclusions: Our study showed the RUDAS domains of visuo-spatial orientation and memory had an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of dementia. However, further research is needed to validate the use of individual RUDAS items for assessing specific cognitive domains.

罗兰通用痴呆评估量表的个体神经认知域在城市文盲人群中检测认知障碍的效用。
简介:像RUDAS这样的简短认知测试对于早期发现神经退行性疾病很有用,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家的低识字率人群中。本研究通过子域评估了RUDAS在秘鲁利马文盲个体中检测MCI和痴呆的诊断性能。方法:我们对一组随机选择的文盲个体进行了二次分析,这些个体在秘鲁利马被招募来验证RUDAS。我们使用Spearman相关系数将RUDAS域和总分与一系列神经心理测试(FDS、BDS、ROCF、MINT和Craft 21)进行比较。为了提高诊断性能,我们计算了每个RUDAS域的曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:我们纳入了187例患者(64例对照组,60例轻度认知障碍患者,63例痴呆患者)。平均RUDAS评分分别为23.87±0.93、20.43±1.39、14.97±2.21。各组之间除意念运动练习和视觉空间练习外,其他各领域的差异均有统计学意义。对于收敛效度,双变量分析中最显著的相关性仍然存在于年龄调整回归中,特别是在实践、记忆和判断方面。MCI和痴呆的RUDAS总分AUC均为98% (95% CI: 96-100%),按领域、判断、语言流畅性和记忆的AUC范围为0.7至0.8。结论:视觉空间定向和记忆的RUDAS域对痴呆的诊断有较好的效果。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证单个RUDAS项目用于评估特定认知领域的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信