Lesley A Norris, Marija Stanojevic, Laura C Skriner, Brian C Chu, Marianne Aalberg, Wendy K Silverman, Denise Bodden, John C Piacentini, Zoran Obradovic, Philip C Kendall
{"title":"Using Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Outcome in a Concatenated Dataset of Youth Anxiety Treatments.","authors":"Lesley A Norris, Marija Stanojevic, Laura C Skriner, Brian C Chu, Marianne Aalberg, Wendy K Silverman, Denise Bodden, John C Piacentini, Zoran Obradovic, Philip C Kendall","doi":"10.1007/s10578-025-01873-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine Learning (ML) is a promising approach for predicting outcomes of youth anxiety treatments. To this end, data from nine randomized controlled trials of youth anxiety treatments were concatenated into a dataset (N = 1362; M<sub>age</sub> = 10.59, SD<sub>age</sub> = 2.47; 48.9% female; 71.9% White, 5.9% Black, Other, 5.9%; 10.8% Hispanic) and ML algorithms were used to predict outcomes. Models were then applied on an external validation sample in a research clinic (N = 50; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.04, SD<sub>age</sub> = 3.22; 56% female; 76% Caucasian, 10% Black, 6% Asian, 2% Other; 6% Hispanic). To examine predictive features by treatment type, Lasso Regression models were built separately for youth who completed individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), family CBT (FCBT), sertraline alone (SRT), and combination of SRT and CBT (COMB). Automatic relevance determination (ARD) emerged as the best performing model in the concatenated (RMSE = 1.84, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.28) and external validation datasets (RMSE = 1.87, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.11). Predictive features of poorer outcomes were primarily indicators of symptom severity and trial effects, although predictors varied within treatments (e.g., caregiver psychopathology was predictive for FCBT; depressive symptoms were predictive for COMB). Implications for use of ML to predict outcomes are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01873-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) is a promising approach for predicting outcomes of youth anxiety treatments. To this end, data from nine randomized controlled trials of youth anxiety treatments were concatenated into a dataset (N = 1362; Mage = 10.59, SDage = 2.47; 48.9% female; 71.9% White, 5.9% Black, Other, 5.9%; 10.8% Hispanic) and ML algorithms were used to predict outcomes. Models were then applied on an external validation sample in a research clinic (N = 50; Mage = 12.04, SDage = 3.22; 56% female; 76% Caucasian, 10% Black, 6% Asian, 2% Other; 6% Hispanic). To examine predictive features by treatment type, Lasso Regression models were built separately for youth who completed individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), family CBT (FCBT), sertraline alone (SRT), and combination of SRT and CBT (COMB). Automatic relevance determination (ARD) emerged as the best performing model in the concatenated (RMSE = 1.84, R2 = 0.28) and external validation datasets (RMSE = 1.87, R2 = 0.11). Predictive features of poorer outcomes were primarily indicators of symptom severity and trial effects, although predictors varied within treatments (e.g., caregiver psychopathology was predictive for FCBT; depressive symptoms were predictive for COMB). Implications for use of ML to predict outcomes are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.