Using Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Outcome in a Concatenated Dataset of Youth Anxiety Treatments.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Lesley A Norris, Marija Stanojevic, Laura C Skriner, Brian C Chu, Marianne Aalberg, Wendy K Silverman, Denise Bodden, John C Piacentini, Zoran Obradovic, Philip C Kendall
{"title":"Using Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Outcome in a Concatenated Dataset of Youth Anxiety Treatments.","authors":"Lesley A Norris, Marija Stanojevic, Laura C Skriner, Brian C Chu, Marianne Aalberg, Wendy K Silverman, Denise Bodden, John C Piacentini, Zoran Obradovic, Philip C Kendall","doi":"10.1007/s10578-025-01873-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine Learning (ML) is a promising approach for predicting outcomes of youth anxiety treatments. To this end, data from nine randomized controlled trials of youth anxiety treatments were concatenated into a dataset (N = 1362; M<sub>age</sub> = 10.59, SD<sub>age</sub> = 2.47; 48.9% female; 71.9% White, 5.9% Black, Other, 5.9%; 10.8% Hispanic) and ML algorithms were used to predict outcomes. Models were then applied on an external validation sample in a research clinic (N = 50; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.04, SD<sub>age</sub> = 3.22; 56% female; 76% Caucasian, 10% Black, 6% Asian, 2% Other; 6% Hispanic). To examine predictive features by treatment type, Lasso Regression models were built separately for youth who completed individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), family CBT (FCBT), sertraline alone (SRT), and combination of SRT and CBT (COMB). Automatic relevance determination (ARD) emerged as the best performing model in the concatenated (RMSE = 1.84, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.28) and external validation datasets (RMSE = 1.87, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.11). Predictive features of poorer outcomes were primarily indicators of symptom severity and trial effects, although predictors varied within treatments (e.g., caregiver psychopathology was predictive for FCBT; depressive symptoms were predictive for COMB). Implications for use of ML to predict outcomes are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01873-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) is a promising approach for predicting outcomes of youth anxiety treatments. To this end, data from nine randomized controlled trials of youth anxiety treatments were concatenated into a dataset (N = 1362; Mage = 10.59, SDage = 2.47; 48.9% female; 71.9% White, 5.9% Black, Other, 5.9%; 10.8% Hispanic) and ML algorithms were used to predict outcomes. Models were then applied on an external validation sample in a research clinic (N = 50; Mage = 12.04, SDage = 3.22; 56% female; 76% Caucasian, 10% Black, 6% Asian, 2% Other; 6% Hispanic). To examine predictive features by treatment type, Lasso Regression models were built separately for youth who completed individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), family CBT (FCBT), sertraline alone (SRT), and combination of SRT and CBT (COMB). Automatic relevance determination (ARD) emerged as the best performing model in the concatenated (RMSE = 1.84, R2 = 0.28) and external validation datasets (RMSE = 1.87, R2 = 0.11). Predictive features of poorer outcomes were primarily indicators of symptom severity and trial effects, although predictors varied within treatments (e.g., caregiver psychopathology was predictive for FCBT; depressive symptoms were predictive for COMB). Implications for use of ML to predict outcomes are discussed.

使用机器学习预测青少年焦虑治疗的连接数据集的治疗结果。
机器学习(ML)是预测青少年焦虑治疗结果的一种很有前途的方法。为此,9项青少年焦虑治疗的随机对照试验的数据被合并成一个数据集(N = 1362;法师= 10.59,法师= 2.47;48.9%的女性;71.9%白色,5.9%黑色,其他,5.9%;10.8%西班牙裔)和ML算法用于预测结果。然后将模型应用于研究诊所的外部验证样本(N = 50;法师= 12.04,法师= 3.22;56%的女性;76%白人,10%黑人,6%亚洲人,2%其他人种;6%的西班牙裔)。为了检验治疗类型的预测特征,分别对完成个体认知行为治疗(CBT)、家庭认知行为治疗(FCBT)、舍曲林单独治疗(SRT)和SRT与CBT联合治疗(COMB)的青少年建立Lasso回归模型。自动相关性测定(ARD)在串联数据集(RMSE = 1.84, R2 = 0.28)和外部验证数据集(RMSE = 1.87, R2 = 0.11)中表现最佳。较差结果的预测特征主要是症状严重程度和试验效果的指标,尽管预测因素因治疗而异(例如,护理者精神病理可预测FCBT;抑郁症状可预测COMB)。讨论了使用机器学习预测结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信