Evaluating the efficacy of LDH and inflammatory indices in discriminating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome from transient tachypnea of the newborns.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Hala M Sakhr, Fayed Hm, Amany E Abdel Aziz, Heba M Qubaisy
{"title":"Evaluating the efficacy of LDH and inflammatory indices in discriminating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome from transient tachypnea of the newborns.","authors":"Hala M Sakhr, Fayed Hm, Amany E Abdel Aziz, Heba M Qubaisy","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05519-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early discrimination between transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is critical for establishing timely targeted therapies. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of LDH, platelet indices, and systemic inflammatory indices in distinguishing neonatal RDS from TTN early.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 300 neonates were enrolled in this case-control study. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were estimated. Platelet and systemic inflammatory indices were calculated using complete blood count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RDS group exhibited substantially higher serum levels of LDH, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) than the TTN and control groups. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR (were significantly higher in the RDS group than in the TTN group. The RDS group also had the lowest median platelet count, platelet mass index, and WBCs/ mean platelet volume (MPV), but much higher MPV/platelet count than the TTN and control groups. The TTN group had more WBCs, lymphocyte percentage, and count, but a lower neutrophil percentage than the RDS group. The ROC curve study demonstrated that serum LDH at a cut-off level of > 660 U/L can discriminate between the RDS and TTN groups. NLR had the highest sensitivity, PLR had the highest specificity, and SII at a cut-off level > 245.57, had 67% sensitivity and 56% specificity. Significant positive correlations were detected between Downe score with NLR (r = 0.317**, p = 0.001), PLR (r = 0.261**, p = 0.009), and SII (r = 0.270**, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LDH levels, platelets, and systematic inflammatory indices could serve as affordable biomarkers for the early distinction between RDS and TTN.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05519-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early discrimination between transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is critical for establishing timely targeted therapies. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of LDH, platelet indices, and systemic inflammatory indices in distinguishing neonatal RDS from TTN early.

Methods: In total, 300 neonates were enrolled in this case-control study. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were estimated. Platelet and systemic inflammatory indices were calculated using complete blood count.

Results: The RDS group exhibited substantially higher serum levels of LDH, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) than the TTN and control groups. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR (were significantly higher in the RDS group than in the TTN group. The RDS group also had the lowest median platelet count, platelet mass index, and WBCs/ mean platelet volume (MPV), but much higher MPV/platelet count than the TTN and control groups. The TTN group had more WBCs, lymphocyte percentage, and count, but a lower neutrophil percentage than the RDS group. The ROC curve study demonstrated that serum LDH at a cut-off level of > 660 U/L can discriminate between the RDS and TTN groups. NLR had the highest sensitivity, PLR had the highest specificity, and SII at a cut-off level > 245.57, had 67% sensitivity and 56% specificity. Significant positive correlations were detected between Downe score with NLR (r = 0.317**, p = 0.001), PLR (r = 0.261**, p = 0.009), and SII (r = 0.270**, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: LDH levels, platelets, and systematic inflammatory indices could serve as affordable biomarkers for the early distinction between RDS and TTN.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评价LDH及炎症指标对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征与短暂性呼吸急促的鉴别作用。
背景:早期鉴别新生儿短暂性呼吸急促(TTN)和呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)对于建立及时的靶向治疗至关重要。我们的目的是评估LDH、血小板指数和全身炎症指数在早期区分新生儿RDS和TTN中的作用。方法:本病例对照研究共纳入300例新生儿。测定乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平。用全血细胞计数计算血小板和全身炎症指数。结果:RDS组血清LDH水平、中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)明显高于TTN组和对照组。RDS组血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR)和单核细胞淋巴细胞比(MLR)显著高于TTN组。RDS组的中位血小板计数、血小板质量指数和白细胞/平均血小板体积(MPV)也最低,但MPV/血小板计数远高于TTN组和对照组。与RDS组相比,TTN组白细胞、淋巴细胞百分比和计数较高,但中性粒细胞百分比较低。ROC曲线研究表明,RDS组和TTN组血清LDH在截断水平为bb0 660 U/L时可以区分。NLR的敏感性最高,PLR的特异性最高,SII在截断水平bb0 245.57下的敏感性为67%,特异性为56%。唐氏评分与NLR (r = 0.317**, p = 0.001)、PLR (r = 0.261**, p = 0.009)、SII (r = 0.270**, p = 0.007)呈显著正相关。结论:LDH水平、血小板和系统性炎症指标可以作为早期区分RDS和TTN的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信