Fluoride mouthrinses for prevention of initial caries in orthodontic patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mikael Sonesson, Svante Twetman
{"title":"Fluoride mouthrinses for prevention of initial caries in orthodontic patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mikael Sonesson, Svante Twetman","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06374-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthodontic patients are often instructed to use fluoride mouthrinses (FMR) to prevent caries during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances (FOA). The aim of this study was to examine the caries preventive effect of FMR during FOA treatment based on randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An information specialist searched five databases up to September 30, 2024. We included trials with parallel groups (intervention vs. control) and a minimum duration of six months. Based on the abstracts, the authors independently selected and reviewed full text papers, extracted key outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was incidence of enamel caries on subject level. We conducted a narrative synthesis and pooled comparable data in a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 22 studies of which seven, involving 704 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Five and two studies had moderate and high risk of bias, respectively. In all studies, FMR was additive to daily use of fluoride toothpaste. The intervention varied from twice daily to twice weekly and the duration ranged from six to 26 months. Five studies were included in a meta-analysis. The aggregated data showed a small risk difference of - 0.07 (95% CI -0.14; -0.01) in initial caries development adjacent to bracket base between the experimental and the control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found insufficient support for a general recommendation to use FMR during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances in populations with regular use of fluoride toothpaste. This does not rule out the possibility that individual orthodontic patients may benefit from FMR after comprehensive risk assessment. Further investigations with standardized interventions and duration, reporting a core outcome set are required to clarify the effectiveness of fluoride mouthrinses in orthodontic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06374-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic patients are often instructed to use fluoride mouthrinses (FMR) to prevent caries during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances (FOA). The aim of this study was to examine the caries preventive effect of FMR during FOA treatment based on randomized controlled trials.

Methods: An information specialist searched five databases up to September 30, 2024. We included trials with parallel groups (intervention vs. control) and a minimum duration of six months. Based on the abstracts, the authors independently selected and reviewed full text papers, extracted key outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was incidence of enamel caries on subject level. We conducted a narrative synthesis and pooled comparable data in a random effects model.

Results: We identified 22 studies of which seven, involving 704 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Five and two studies had moderate and high risk of bias, respectively. In all studies, FMR was additive to daily use of fluoride toothpaste. The intervention varied from twice daily to twice weekly and the duration ranged from six to 26 months. Five studies were included in a meta-analysis. The aggregated data showed a small risk difference of - 0.07 (95% CI -0.14; -0.01) in initial caries development adjacent to bracket base between the experimental and the control groups.

Conclusion: This review found insufficient support for a general recommendation to use FMR during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances in populations with regular use of fluoride toothpaste. This does not rule out the possibility that individual orthodontic patients may benefit from FMR after comprehensive risk assessment. Further investigations with standardized interventions and duration, reporting a core outcome set are required to clarify the effectiveness of fluoride mouthrinses in orthodontic patients.

氟化物漱口水预防正畸患者初龋的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:正畸患者在固定矫治器(FOA)治疗期间,经常被要求使用含氟漱口水(FMR)来预防龋齿。本研究的目的是在随机对照试验的基础上,研究FMR在FOA治疗期间的龋预防效果。方法:信息专家检索5个数据库,截止到2024年9月30日。我们纳入了平行组(干预组与对照组)的试验,最小持续时间为6个月。基于摘要,作者独立选择和审查全文论文,提取关键结局数据,并评估偏倚风险。主要观察指标为受试者牙釉质龋的发生率。我们进行了叙事综合,并在随机效应模型中汇集了可比数据。结果:我们确定了22项研究,其中7项,涉及704例患者,符合纳入标准。5项和2项研究分别具有中度和高度偏倚风险。在所有的研究中,FMR是日常使用含氟牙膏的添加剂。干预从每天两次到每周两次不等,持续时间从6到26个月不等。荟萃分析纳入了五项研究。汇总数据显示风险差异较小,为- 0.07 (95% CI -0.14;-0.01),在托架附近的初始龋发育方面,实验组和对照组之间的差异。结论:本综述发现,在经常使用含氟牙膏的人群中,在固定正畸器具治疗期间使用FMR的一般建议没有足够的支持。这并不排除个体正畸患者在综合风险评估后可能受益于FMR的可能性。需要进行标准化干预措施和持续时间的进一步调查,报告核心结果集,以阐明氟化物漱口水对正畸患者的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信