To polish or not to polish? An evaluation of the accuracy in measuring depth of cure calculated by microhardness ratio.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Zeynep Hale Keleş, Musa Kazım Üçüncü
{"title":"To polish or not to polish? An evaluation of the accuracy in measuring depth of cure calculated by microhardness ratio.","authors":"Zeynep Hale Keleş, Musa Kazım Üçüncü","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06382-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of surface polishing on the reliability of microhardness ratio-based assessment of depth of cure in resin-based composites.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 60 composite discs (n = 10 per group) were prepared using six different resin-based composite materials. The tested materials included two conventional sculptable composites (Tetric Prime and Neo Spectra ST HV), one conventional flowable composite (Tetric EvoFlow), one bulk-fill sculptable composite (Tetric PowerFill), and two bulk-fill flowable composites (Tetric PowerFlow and SDR Plus), all prepared according to the respective manufacturers' instructions. Prior to microhardness measurements, the bottom-to-top surface microhardness ratios were assessed using three distinct approaches: 1)unpolished bottom/unpolished top, 2) unpolished bottom/polished top, 3) polished bottom/polished top. Vickers Microhardness Numbers (VHN) were determined under a load of approximately 50 g applied for 15 s. The threshold value for acceptable depth of cure was set at 80%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the depth of cure measurements of resin-based materials when evaluated using the unpolished bottom/polished top, polished bottom/top, and unpolished bottom/top approaches (p < 0.001). Among these, the lowest degree of conversion was consistently observed in the configuration where the bottom surface remained unpolished while the top surface was polished. Notably, SDR was the only material that surpassed the 80% threshold across all three evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unpolished bottom/polished top configuration resulted in the lowest conversion rates, primarily due to the increase in microhardness values caused by polishing the top surface. Whether or not surface finishing is applied has a substantial impact on the mechanical performance, and should therefore be thoughtfully considered when interpreting the effectiveness of polymerization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06382-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of surface polishing on the reliability of microhardness ratio-based assessment of depth of cure in resin-based composites.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 composite discs (n = 10 per group) were prepared using six different resin-based composite materials. The tested materials included two conventional sculptable composites (Tetric Prime and Neo Spectra ST HV), one conventional flowable composite (Tetric EvoFlow), one bulk-fill sculptable composite (Tetric PowerFill), and two bulk-fill flowable composites (Tetric PowerFlow and SDR Plus), all prepared according to the respective manufacturers' instructions. Prior to microhardness measurements, the bottom-to-top surface microhardness ratios were assessed using three distinct approaches: 1)unpolished bottom/unpolished top, 2) unpolished bottom/polished top, 3) polished bottom/polished top. Vickers Microhardness Numbers (VHN) were determined under a load of approximately 50 g applied for 15 s. The threshold value for acceptable depth of cure was set at 80%.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the depth of cure measurements of resin-based materials when evaluated using the unpolished bottom/polished top, polished bottom/top, and unpolished bottom/top approaches (p < 0.001). Among these, the lowest degree of conversion was consistently observed in the configuration where the bottom surface remained unpolished while the top surface was polished. Notably, SDR was the only material that surpassed the 80% threshold across all three evaluation methods.

Conclusion: The unpolished bottom/polished top configuration resulted in the lowest conversion rates, primarily due to the increase in microhardness values caused by polishing the top surface. Whether or not surface finishing is applied has a substantial impact on the mechanical performance, and should therefore be thoughtfully considered when interpreting the effectiveness of polymerization.

打磨还是不打磨?用显微硬度比计算固化深度精度的评价。
目的:本研究旨在评估表面抛光对基于显微硬度比的树脂基复合材料固化深度评估可靠性的影响。材料和方法:采用6种不同的树脂基复合材料,共制备60个复合椎间盘,每组10个。测试材料包括两种常规可雕刻复合材料(Tetric Prime和Neo Spectra ST HV),一种常规可流动复合材料(Tetric EvoFlow),一种散装填充可雕刻复合材料(Tetric PowerFill),以及两种散装填充可流动复合材料(Tetric PowerFlow和SDR Plus),所有材料都根据各自制造商的说明制备。在进行显微硬度测量之前,使用三种不同的方法评估底部与顶部表面的显微硬度比:1)未抛光的底部/未抛光的顶部,2)未抛光的底部/抛光的顶部,3)抛光的底部/抛光的顶部。维氏显微硬度值(VHN)在约50g载荷作用15 s下测定。可接受固化深度的阈值设为80%。结果:统计分析显示,当使用未抛光的底部/抛光的顶部、抛光的底部/顶部和未抛光的底部/顶部方法评估树脂基材料的固化深度时,测量结果存在显著差异(p结论:未抛光的底部/抛光的顶部配置导致最低的转化率,主要是由于抛光的顶部表面导致显微硬度值的增加。是否进行表面处理对机械性能有实质性的影响,因此在解释聚合的有效性时应仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信