Retrospective cohort of prenatal home ultrasound utilization and maternal-neonatal outcomes.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anat Pardo, Erkan Kalafat, Shira Hazon, Monica Pailis, Emilie Klochendler-Frishman, Or Lee Rak, Ofri Samueloff, Rachel Gomez-Tolub, Anat Shmueli, Noam Pardo, Tomer Sela, Leor Wolff, Asnat Walfisch, Arnon Wiznitzer, Eran Hadar
{"title":"Retrospective cohort of prenatal home ultrasound utilization and maternal-neonatal outcomes.","authors":"Anat Pardo, Erkan Kalafat, Shira Hazon, Monica Pailis, Emilie Klochendler-Frishman, Or Lee Rak, Ofri Samueloff, Rachel Gomez-Tolub, Anat Shmueli, Noam Pardo, Tomer Sela, Leor Wolff, Asnat Walfisch, Arnon Wiznitzer, Eran Hadar","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07664-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth solutions, including ultrasound technology, are sought as a modality to enhance prenatal. We aimed to evaluate the utilization of a self-operated home ultrasound service in a real-world large cohort, comparing users vs. non-users. This service provides a handheld, app-connected ultrasound device for remote basic fetal monitoring, with its use determined at the discretion of the patient as a supplement - rather than a replacement - to standard prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes among users versus non-users of the home ultrasound service, between January 2020 and December 2022. Primary outcome measures were preterm delivery and a composite adverse neonatal outcome. Confounders were balanced between the groups using nearest neighbour matching with propensity scores. Multivariable analyses including the confounders were conducted in matched cohorts to obtain doubly robust estimates. A sensitivity analysis included those who began using the device before 22 gestational weeks and continued for more than 10 weeks. Safety was assessed by identifying any maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal complications plausibly linked to device use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study compared two cohorts; the exposed cohort of 4,460 pregnant women using Clalit's home ultrasound service (users), and the control (non-users) cohort of 102,707 pregnant women with an equal HMO insurance status. Users had higher socioeconomic scores, were more primiparous and had a higher incidence of chronic disease and pregnancy complications. Preterm birth rates and adverse neonatal outcomes did not differ between groups. Device utilization, both overall and stratified by actual utilization degree, was safe and not associated with any maternal, obstetrical or neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A self-operated home ultrasound device, during the second and third trimester, is safe and not significantly associated with any pregnancy adverse event or neonatal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07664-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth solutions, including ultrasound technology, are sought as a modality to enhance prenatal. We aimed to evaluate the utilization of a self-operated home ultrasound service in a real-world large cohort, comparing users vs. non-users. This service provides a handheld, app-connected ultrasound device for remote basic fetal monitoring, with its use determined at the discretion of the patient as a supplement - rather than a replacement - to standard prenatal care.

Methods: Retrospective analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes among users versus non-users of the home ultrasound service, between January 2020 and December 2022. Primary outcome measures were preterm delivery and a composite adverse neonatal outcome. Confounders were balanced between the groups using nearest neighbour matching with propensity scores. Multivariable analyses including the confounders were conducted in matched cohorts to obtain doubly robust estimates. A sensitivity analysis included those who began using the device before 22 gestational weeks and continued for more than 10 weeks. Safety was assessed by identifying any maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal complications plausibly linked to device use.

Results: The study compared two cohorts; the exposed cohort of 4,460 pregnant women using Clalit's home ultrasound service (users), and the control (non-users) cohort of 102,707 pregnant women with an equal HMO insurance status. Users had higher socioeconomic scores, were more primiparous and had a higher incidence of chronic disease and pregnancy complications. Preterm birth rates and adverse neonatal outcomes did not differ between groups. Device utilization, both overall and stratified by actual utilization degree, was safe and not associated with any maternal, obstetrical or neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusions: A self-operated home ultrasound device, during the second and third trimester, is safe and not significantly associated with any pregnancy adverse event or neonatal complications.

产前家庭超声使用和母婴结局的回顾性队列研究。
背景:远程保健解决方案,包括超声技术,正在寻求作为一种方式,以提高产前。我们的目的是评估在现实世界的大型队列中,对用户和非用户进行比较,自助式家庭超声服务的使用情况。这项服务提供了一种手持式、应用程序连接的超声波设备,用于远程基本胎儿监测,其使用由患者自行决定,作为标准产前护理的补充,而不是替代。方法:回顾性分析比较2020年1月至2022年12月期间使用和未使用家庭超声服务的孕产妇和新生儿结局。主要结局指标为早产和新生儿综合不良结局。使用最近邻匹配和倾向得分来平衡各组之间的混杂因素。在匹配的队列中进行包括混杂因素在内的多变量分析,以获得双重稳健估计。敏感性分析包括那些在妊娠22周之前开始使用该设备并持续使用超过10周的人。通过确定任何可能与器械使用相关的产妇、产科或新生儿并发症来评估安全性。结果:该研究比较了两个队列;4460名使用Clalit家庭超声服务的孕妇(用户)和102707名具有同等HMO保险地位的孕妇(非用户)。使用者有较高的社会经济分数,更初产,有较高的慢性疾病和妊娠并发症的发生率。早产率和新生儿不良结局在两组之间没有差异。器械的使用,无论是总体上还是按实际使用程度分层,都是安全的,与任何孕产妇、产科或新生儿不良妊娠结局无关。结论:在妊娠中期和晚期,自行操作的家用超声设备是安全的,与任何妊娠不良事件或新生儿并发症无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信