Changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sevim Baltali, Mehmet Baltali, Ayşegül Ercan, Umut Deniz Akdağ, Mehmet Toptaş
{"title":"Changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Sevim Baltali, Mehmet Baltali, Ayşegül Ercan, Umut Deniz Akdağ, Mehmet Toptaş","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07805-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for singleton caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants before, during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and after vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. It included data from 9,744 consecutive women-7,083 (72.7%) Turkish citizens and 2,661 (27.3%) migrants-who underwent singleton caesarean sections between March 2018 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the change in monthly utilization rates of neuraxial anaesthesia (NA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary objectives included caesarean section urgency and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the number of caesarean sections performed using NA among Turkish citizens and migrants (relative ratio [RR] 1.003, P < 0.001 and RR 1.005, P < 0.01, respectively). Both groups showed a significant immediate increase in the usage rate of NA at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (RR 1.095, P < 0.001 and 1.134, P < 0.001, respectively). The introduction of vaccination had no effect on the use of NA (RR 0.970, P = 1.004, and RR 1.000, P = 0.99, respectively). The significant between-group difference in the pre-pandemic usage rate of NA diminished following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant between-group difference observed after vaccination (93.3% vs. 90.9%., P = 0.006, 98.4% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.0; 95.4% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.801, respectively). Category-1 caesarean section events increased throughout the study period (471(10.7%) before COVID-19, 321(17.0%) during the first year, and 700 (20.2%) after vaccination; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (stillbirths, Apgar 5-min score < 7) among the three time periods (89(2.0%), 41(2.2%), and 49(1.4%); P = 0.065).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, our study revealed a continuation of the upward trend in the use of NA for caesarean sections.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07805-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for singleton caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants before, during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and after vaccination.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. It included data from 9,744 consecutive women-7,083 (72.7%) Turkish citizens and 2,661 (27.3%) migrants-who underwent singleton caesarean sections between March 2018 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the change in monthly utilization rates of neuraxial anaesthesia (NA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary objectives included caesarean section urgency and neonatal outcomes.

Results: During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the number of caesarean sections performed using NA among Turkish citizens and migrants (relative ratio [RR] 1.003, P < 0.001 and RR 1.005, P < 0.01, respectively). Both groups showed a significant immediate increase in the usage rate of NA at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (RR 1.095, P < 0.001 and 1.134, P < 0.001, respectively). The introduction of vaccination had no effect on the use of NA (RR 0.970, P = 1.004, and RR 1.000, P = 0.99, respectively). The significant between-group difference in the pre-pandemic usage rate of NA diminished following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant between-group difference observed after vaccination (93.3% vs. 90.9%., P = 0.006, 98.4% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.0; 95.4% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.801, respectively). Category-1 caesarean section events increased throughout the study period (471(10.7%) before COVID-19, 321(17.0%) during the first year, and 700 (20.2%) after vaccination; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (stillbirths, Apgar 5-min score < 7) among the three time periods (89(2.0%), 41(2.2%), and 49(1.4%); P = 0.065).

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, our study revealed a continuation of the upward trend in the use of NA for caesarean sections.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间土耳其公民和移民剖腹产麻醉技术选择的变化:中断时间序列分析
背景:本研究的目的是研究2019冠状病毒病大流行对土耳其公民和移民在2019冠状病毒病大流行前、期间和接种疫苗后单胎剖腹产麻醉技术选择变化的影响。方法:这项单中心、回顾性观察性研究在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的一家三级医院进行。它包括9,744名连续女性的数据,其中7,083名(72.7%)土耳其公民和2,661名(27.3%)移民,他们在2018年3月至2023年3月期间接受了单胎剖腹产手术。主要观察指标为2019冠状病毒病大流行期间每月神经轴麻醉(NA)使用率的变化。次要目的包括剖宫产紧急程度和新生儿结局。结果:在研究期间,土耳其公民和移民使用NA进行剖宫产的数量呈增加趋势(相对比[RR] 1.003, P)。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们的研究显示使用NA进行剖宫产的趋势持续上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信