Supera cognitive stimulation study with cognitively-unimpaired older adults: methodology and initial results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809882
Thais Bento Lima da Silva, Tiago Nascimento Ordonez, Gabriela Dos Santos, Laydiane Alves Costa, Ana Paula Bagli Moreira, Diana Dos Santos Bacelar, Maria Antonia Antunes de Souza, Sabrina Aparecida da Silva, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Monica Sanches Yassuda
{"title":"Supera cognitive stimulation study with cognitively-unimpaired older adults: methodology and initial results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Thais Bento Lima da Silva, Tiago Nascimento Ordonez, Gabriela Dos Santos, Laydiane Alves Costa, Ana Paula Bagli Moreira, Diana Dos Santos Bacelar, Maria Antonia Antunes de Souza, Sabrina Aparecida da Silva, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Monica Sanches Yassuda","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific investigations have highlighted the benefits of cognitive stimulation for cognitive, psychological, and social aspects in older individuals. However, there is a dearth of long-term, methodologically-rigorous studies. The aim of the present study was to describe the methods and the initial characteristics of the participants in a randomized controlled trial on cognitive stimulation. A total of 578 older individuals accepted invitations to participate in the study. Of these respondents, 362 met the eligibility criteria, and 255 were selected and randomized into the training, active control, and passive control groups. During the baseline stage (T0), 48 participants withdrew, resulting in a final T0 sample of 207 participants. The three groups were similar in terms of cognitive performance and sociodemographic and psychosocial variables, but they differed significantly regarding depressive symptoms, with the training group scoring higher. The methods herein described can help guide future research on cognitive stimulation in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"83 7","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific investigations have highlighted the benefits of cognitive stimulation for cognitive, psychological, and social aspects in older individuals. However, there is a dearth of long-term, methodologically-rigorous studies. The aim of the present study was to describe the methods and the initial characteristics of the participants in a randomized controlled trial on cognitive stimulation. A total of 578 older individuals accepted invitations to participate in the study. Of these respondents, 362 met the eligibility criteria, and 255 were selected and randomized into the training, active control, and passive control groups. During the baseline stage (T0), 48 participants withdrew, resulting in a final T0 sample of 207 participants. The three groups were similar in terms of cognitive performance and sociodemographic and psychosocial variables, but they differed significantly regarding depressive symptoms, with the training group scoring higher. The methods herein described can help guide future research on cognitive stimulation in older adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Supera认知刺激对认知未受损老年人的研究:随机对照临床试验的方法学和初步结果。
科学研究强调了认知刺激对老年人认知、心理和社会方面的益处。然而,缺乏长期的、方法严谨的研究。本研究的目的是描述认知刺激随机对照试验中参与者的方法和初始特征。共有578名老年人接受了参加这项研究的邀请。在这些受访者中,362人符合资格标准,255人被选中并随机分为训练组、主动对照组和被动对照组。在基线阶段(T0), 48名参与者退出,最终的T0样本为207名参与者。这三组在认知表现、社会人口学和社会心理变量方面相似,但在抑郁症状方面存在显著差异,训练组得分更高。本文描述的方法可以帮助指导未来对老年人认知刺激的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信