Maternal health education and social support needs across the perinatal continuum of care: a thematic analysis of interviews with postpartum women in Punjab, India.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Preetika Sharma, Rashmi Bagga, Maliha Khan, Mona Duggal, Darshan Hosapatna Basavarajappa, Alka Ahuja, Ankita Kankaria, Nadia Diamond-Smith, Vijay Kumar, Manju Kashyap, Pushpendra Singh, Jasmeet Kaur, Alison M El Ayadi
{"title":"Maternal health education and social support needs across the perinatal continuum of care: a thematic analysis of interviews with postpartum women in Punjab, India.","authors":"Preetika Sharma, Rashmi Bagga, Maliha Khan, Mona Duggal, Darshan Hosapatna Basavarajappa, Alka Ahuja, Ankita Kankaria, Nadia Diamond-Smith, Vijay Kumar, Manju Kashyap, Pushpendra Singh, Jasmeet Kaur, Alison M El Ayadi","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07813-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal social support and maternal education throughout the antenatal, childbirth, and postpartum phases contribute to the optimization of health and well-being of mothers and infants. Understanding deficits among support and educational resources can contribute to improved public health decision-making and maternal and child healthcare and wellbeing. This study aimed to explore health and social experiences and resources to characterize and unmet needs across the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study among 20 primiparous postpartum women from Punjab state, North India. Potential participants were identified from antenatal care registers maintained at healthcare sub-centers and were interviewed at their homes. Data were analyzed thematically, examining social support resources and needs across perinatal phases by social support domain: emotional, tangible, and informational.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants received the most social and educational support antenatally. We identified considerably low knowledge surrounding childbirth and low maternal knowledge and social support around postpartum care and practices. Notable issues reported involved lack of consent, and satisfaction and comfort with childbirth care. Participant narratives highlighted the crucial role of both formal and informal support structures, with a heavy reliance on advice from community health workers (ASHAs), midwives, and doctors. Unmet needs were identified in areas such as post-cesarean section diet and care, institutional childbirth, and ASHA support, along with discrepancies between the advice given and evidence-based practices. While many participants' support needs were met by their networks, these gaps highlight critical areas for systems improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study-identified gaps in maternal knowledge and support, particularly in the post-cesarean and institutional childbirth contexts, are underexplored in existing research. Findings suggest critical areas for improvement in maternal healthcare support, particularly regarding the alignment of advice with evidence-based practices. Programs should focus on educating women about the institutional childbirth process and providing better postpartum care education, especially regarding post-cesarean care and infant care. Strengthening the role of community health workers (ASHAs) with evidence-based training can improve support. Additionally, programs should enhance the integration of both formal (doctors, midwives) and informal support networks to create a more comprehensive care system.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This research is part of the formative phase of a larger intervention trial. Trial was prospectively registered with Clinical trial registry of India. (CTRI/2020/12/029800 [Registered on: 15/12/2020].</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07813-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perinatal social support and maternal education throughout the antenatal, childbirth, and postpartum phases contribute to the optimization of health and well-being of mothers and infants. Understanding deficits among support and educational resources can contribute to improved public health decision-making and maternal and child healthcare and wellbeing. This study aimed to explore health and social experiences and resources to characterize and unmet needs across the perinatal period.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study among 20 primiparous postpartum women from Punjab state, North India. Potential participants were identified from antenatal care registers maintained at healthcare sub-centers and were interviewed at their homes. Data were analyzed thematically, examining social support resources and needs across perinatal phases by social support domain: emotional, tangible, and informational.

Results: Study participants received the most social and educational support antenatally. We identified considerably low knowledge surrounding childbirth and low maternal knowledge and social support around postpartum care and practices. Notable issues reported involved lack of consent, and satisfaction and comfort with childbirth care. Participant narratives highlighted the crucial role of both formal and informal support structures, with a heavy reliance on advice from community health workers (ASHAs), midwives, and doctors. Unmet needs were identified in areas such as post-cesarean section diet and care, institutional childbirth, and ASHA support, along with discrepancies between the advice given and evidence-based practices. While many participants' support needs were met by their networks, these gaps highlight critical areas for systems improvement.

Conclusion: This study-identified gaps in maternal knowledge and support, particularly in the post-cesarean and institutional childbirth contexts, are underexplored in existing research. Findings suggest critical areas for improvement in maternal healthcare support, particularly regarding the alignment of advice with evidence-based practices. Programs should focus on educating women about the institutional childbirth process and providing better postpartum care education, especially regarding post-cesarean care and infant care. Strengthening the role of community health workers (ASHAs) with evidence-based training can improve support. Additionally, programs should enhance the integration of both formal (doctors, midwives) and informal support networks to create a more comprehensive care system.

Trial registration: This research is part of the formative phase of a larger intervention trial. Trial was prospectively registered with Clinical trial registry of India. (CTRI/2020/12/029800 [Registered on: 15/12/2020].

整个围产期连续护理的孕产妇保健教育和社会支持需求:对印度旁遮普邦产后妇女访谈的专题分析。
背景:围产期社会支持和贯穿产前、分娩和产后阶段的孕产妇教育有助于优化母亲和婴儿的健康和福祉。了解支持和教育资源的不足有助于改善公共卫生决策和妇幼保健和福祉。本研究旨在探讨健康和社会经验和资源,以确定围产期的特征和未满足的需求。方法:对来自印度北部旁遮普邦的20名初产产后妇女进行定性研究。从保健分中心保存的产前保健登记册中确定潜在的参与者,并在其家中进行访谈。对数据进行主题分析,通过社会支持领域:情感、有形和信息来检查围产期的社会支持资源和需求。结果:研究参与者在产前获得了最多的社会和教育支持。我们确定了相当低的知识围绕分娩和低产妇知识和产后护理和实践的社会支持。值得注意的问题包括缺乏同意,以及对分娩护理的满意度和舒适度。与会者的叙述强调了正式和非正式支持结构的关键作用,严重依赖社区卫生工作者、助产士和医生的建议。在剖宫产后饮食和护理、机构分娩和ASHA支持等领域确定了未满足的需求,以及所提供的建议与循证实践之间的差异。虽然许多参与者的支持需求得到了其网络的满足,但这些差距突出了系统改进的关键领域。结论:本研究确定了在产妇知识和支持方面的差距,特别是在剖宫产后和机构分娩背景下,现有研究尚未充分探讨。调查结果提出了改善孕产妇保健支持的关键领域,特别是在将咨询与循证做法相结合方面。项目应侧重于教育妇女有关机构分娩过程和提供更好的产后护理教育,特别是关于剖宫产后护理和婴儿护理的教育。通过循证培训加强社区卫生工作者的作用可以改善支持。此外,规划应加强正式(医生、助产士)和非正式支持网络的整合,以创建一个更全面的护理系统。试验登记:这项研究是一个更大的干预试验形成阶段的一部分。试验在印度临床试验注册中心前瞻性注册。(CTRI/2020/12/029800[注册日期:15/12/2020]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信