Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Multi-bone Modeling and Joint Level Measurements.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kassidy Knutson, Andrew C Peterson, Rich J Lisonbee, Takuma Miyamoto, Nicola Krähenbühl, Amy L Lenz
{"title":"Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Multi-bone Modeling and Joint Level Measurements.","authors":"Kassidy Knutson, Andrew C Peterson, Rich J Lisonbee, Takuma Miyamoto, Nicola Krähenbühl, Amy L Lenz","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03775-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to characterize joint level morphology and alignment differences across stages of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) within the talocrural, subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints using multi-bone statistical shape modeling (SSM) and joint distance measurements from weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans. This was achieved by employing multi-bone SSM in conjunction with precise joint measurement analysis, utilizing WBCT scans to investigate the intricate changes within the talocrural, subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with PCFD who failed conservative treatment. Two groups of 20 feet each were formed for flexible PCFD and rigid PCFD, with 27 additional feet identified as asymptomatic controls. All 67 participants underwent a WBCT scan, and 3D models were created as inputs for multi-bone SSM and joint distance measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first principal component analysis mode contained 45.8% of the variation in the population while the second mode contained 13.3% of the variation and the third mode contained 6.4% of variation accounting for 65.6% of the overall variation in the multi-bone model. Joint space distance measurement differences were observed between all three groups for all articulations. The primary difference between flexible PCFD and rigid PCFD multi-bone SSM was a statistically significant medial shift of alignment of the talar neck, resulting in worsened peritalar subluxation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCFD is quantifiably variable across a clinical population when evaluating joint level measurements as well as morphologic and alignment variations. Talonavicular joint malalignment severity may be a clinical key in distinguishing between stages of PCFD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03775-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to characterize joint level morphology and alignment differences across stages of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) within the talocrural, subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints using multi-bone statistical shape modeling (SSM) and joint distance measurements from weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans. This was achieved by employing multi-bone SSM in conjunction with precise joint measurement analysis, utilizing WBCT scans to investigate the intricate changes within the talocrural, subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with PCFD who failed conservative treatment. Two groups of 20 feet each were formed for flexible PCFD and rigid PCFD, with 27 additional feet identified as asymptomatic controls. All 67 participants underwent a WBCT scan, and 3D models were created as inputs for multi-bone SSM and joint distance measures.

Results: The first principal component analysis mode contained 45.8% of the variation in the population while the second mode contained 13.3% of the variation and the third mode contained 6.4% of variation accounting for 65.6% of the overall variation in the multi-bone model. Joint space distance measurement differences were observed between all three groups for all articulations. The primary difference between flexible PCFD and rigid PCFD multi-bone SSM was a statistically significant medial shift of alignment of the talar neck, resulting in worsened peritalar subluxation.

Conclusion: PCFD is quantifiably variable across a clinical population when evaluating joint level measurements as well as morphologic and alignment variations. Talonavicular joint malalignment severity may be a clinical key in distinguishing between stages of PCFD.

进行性塌陷足畸形:多骨建模和关节水平测量。
目的:本研究的目的是利用多骨统计形状建模(SSM)和负重计算机断层扫描(WBCT)的关节距离测量来表征距骨、距下、距骨舟骨和跟骨六方关节的进行性塌陷足畸形(PCFD)不同阶段的关节形态和排列差异。这是通过采用多骨SSM结合精确的关节测量分析,利用WBCT扫描来研究距骨、距下、距骨舟骨和跟骨立方关节内的复杂变化来实现的。方法:对保守治疗失败的PCFD患者进行回顾性分析。柔性PCFD和刚性PCFD分为两组,每组20英尺,另外27英尺被确定为无症状对照组。所有67名参与者都接受了WBCT扫描,并创建了3D模型作为多骨SSM和关节距离测量的输入。结果:在多骨模型中,第一主成分分析模式占总体变异的45.8%,第二主成分分析模式占总体变异的13.3%,第三主成分分析模式占总体变异的6.4%,占总体变异的65.6%。观察三组间所有关节的关节间隙距离测量差异。柔性PCFD与刚性PCFD多骨SSM的主要差异是距骨颈对线内侧移位,导致肱骨周围半脱位加重。结论:在评估关节水平测量以及形态和排列变化时,PCFD在临床人群中是可量化的变量。距舟关节错位严重程度可能是区分PCFD分期的临床关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信