Assessment of the robotic devices for overground gait training in post stroke patient: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Α Ploumis, P Gkatziani, P Tsingeli, G Ntritsos, D Dimopoulos, A Athanasiou, A Kefalas, N D Varvarousis
{"title":"Assessment of the robotic devices for overground gait training in post stroke patient: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Α Ploumis, P Gkatziani, P Tsingeli, G Ntritsos, D Dimopoulos, A Athanasiou, A Kefalas, N D Varvarousis","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stroke is a major cause of disability, impacting mobility worldwide. Overground robotic-assisted gait training (o-RAGT) uses wearable exoskeletons to improve walking. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess its effectiveness versus conventional gait training in enhancing gait velocity and balance in post-stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Our search was conducted in the Pubmed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Scopus and PEDro electronic databases for English journal articles about human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the last two decades, investigating o-RAGT effects on gait parameters of poststroke patients compared with conventional gait training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive literature search identified seven RCTs with a total of 288 participants. Meta-analysis results indicated that o-RAGT significantly improved post-intervention gait velocity (summary mean difference: 0.09 m/sec, 95% CI: 0.02-0.17), while other gait parameters, such as stride length and cadence, showed no statistically significant differences. The intervention was well-tolerated, with no major adverse events reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the positive impact on gait speed, challenges remain, including high device costs and the need for further research to optimize training parameters. These findings support the potential of o-RAGT as an effective tool for gait rehabilitation in stroke survivors, highlighting the need for larger studies with long-term follow-up to refine its clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stroke is a major cause of disability, impacting mobility worldwide. Overground robotic-assisted gait training (o-RAGT) uses wearable exoskeletons to improve walking. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess its effectiveness versus conventional gait training in enhancing gait velocity and balance in post-stroke patients.

Design: Our search was conducted in the Pubmed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Scopus and PEDro electronic databases for English journal articles about human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the last two decades, investigating o-RAGT effects on gait parameters of poststroke patients compared with conventional gait training.

Results: A comprehensive literature search identified seven RCTs with a total of 288 participants. Meta-analysis results indicated that o-RAGT significantly improved post-intervention gait velocity (summary mean difference: 0.09 m/sec, 95% CI: 0.02-0.17), while other gait parameters, such as stride length and cadence, showed no statistically significant differences. The intervention was well-tolerated, with no major adverse events reported.

Conclusion: Despite the positive impact on gait speed, challenges remain, including high device costs and the need for further research to optimize training parameters. These findings support the potential of o-RAGT as an effective tool for gait rehabilitation in stroke survivors, highlighting the need for larger studies with long-term follow-up to refine its clinical application.

脑卒中后患者地面步态训练机器人设备的评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:中风是导致残疾的主要原因,影响着全世界的行动能力。地面机器人辅助步态训练(o-RAGT)使用可穿戴外骨骼来改善步行。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了其与常规步态训练相比在提高卒中后患者步态速度和平衡方面的有效性。设计:我们在Pubmed、Cochrane、ScienceDirect、Scopus和PEDro电子数据库中检索了过去20年人类随机对照试验(rct)的英文期刊文章,研究了与常规步态训练相比,o-RAGT对中风后患者步态参数的影响。结果:综合文献检索确定了7项随机对照试验,共288名受试者。meta分析结果显示,o-RAGT显著改善了干预后的步态速度(汇总平均差异:0.09 m/sec, 95% CI: 0.02-0.17),而其他步态参数,如步幅和步幅,差异无统计学意义。该干预措施耐受性良好,无重大不良事件报告。结论:尽管对步态速度有积极影响,但挑战仍然存在,包括设备成本高,需要进一步研究以优化训练参数。这些发现支持o-RAGT作为中风幸存者步态康复的有效工具的潜力,强调需要更大规模的长期随访研究来完善其临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信