Short-term CGM as a tool to optimize glycemic control and defer intensive insulin therapy in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a Belgian real-life study.
Philippe Oriot, Linh Bui, Noémie Klipper Dit Kurz, Mirela Morisca Gavriliu, Maria-Claudia Negrea, Michel P Hermans
{"title":"Short-term CGM as a tool to optimize glycemic control and defer intensive insulin therapy in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a Belgian real-life study.","authors":"Philippe Oriot, Linh Bui, Noémie Klipper Dit Kurz, Mirela Morisca Gavriliu, Maria-Claudia Negrea, Michel P Hermans","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2025.2528030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) benefits type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), but its role in non-intensive insulin therapy remains underexplored. This study evaluates whether a short-term CGM non-blinded can postpone the escalation to multiple daily insulin injections in people with poorly controlled T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective real-world study analyzed data from 309 adults with T2D in primary care who used a 10 or 14-day CGM (2020-2024). The primary objective was to assess CGM's impact on therapy escalation, particularly to MDI. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting the intensification of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 309 participants (median age: 65 [56-73] years, diabetes duration: 16 [11-23] years, baseline HbA1c: 8.6% [70 mmol/mol]), 91.3% were deemed unsuitable for MDI based on CGM results (non-MDI GLT group, <i>n</i> = 282). In this group, 76% achieved an HbA1c-GMI differential > 0.5%, and 54% >1.0% after 14 day-CGM. Basal insulin use decreased slightly (70% to 64%, <i>p</i> = 0.13), while twice-daily insulin increased (12% to 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). GLTs remained largely unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A short-term CGM prevented MDI escalation in 91.3% of poorly controlled T2D adults, reinforcing its role as a cost-effective strategy. CGM likely improved self-management behaviors, as evidenced by frequent HbA1c-GMI differentials, reflecting better management of hyperglycemia. These findings highlight CGM as a practical behavioral and therapeutic tool in diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2025.2528030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) benefits type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), but its role in non-intensive insulin therapy remains underexplored. This study evaluates whether a short-term CGM non-blinded can postpone the escalation to multiple daily insulin injections in people with poorly controlled T2D.
Methods: This retrospective real-world study analyzed data from 309 adults with T2D in primary care who used a 10 or 14-day CGM (2020-2024). The primary objective was to assess CGM's impact on therapy escalation, particularly to MDI. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting the intensification of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT).
Results: Among the 309 participants (median age: 65 [56-73] years, diabetes duration: 16 [11-23] years, baseline HbA1c: 8.6% [70 mmol/mol]), 91.3% were deemed unsuitable for MDI based on CGM results (non-MDI GLT group, n = 282). In this group, 76% achieved an HbA1c-GMI differential > 0.5%, and 54% >1.0% after 14 day-CGM. Basal insulin use decreased slightly (70% to 64%, p = 0.13), while twice-daily insulin increased (12% to 18%, p = 0.02). GLTs remained largely unchanged.
Conclusion: A short-term CGM prevented MDI escalation in 91.3% of poorly controlled T2D adults, reinforcing its role as a cost-effective strategy. CGM likely improved self-management behaviors, as evidenced by frequent HbA1c-GMI differentials, reflecting better management of hyperglycemia. These findings highlight CGM as a practical behavioral and therapeutic tool in diabetes care.
期刊介绍:
Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.