Short-term CGM as a tool to optimize glycemic control and defer intensive insulin therapy in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a Belgian real-life study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Philippe Oriot, Linh Bui, Noémie Klipper Dit Kurz, Mirela Morisca Gavriliu, Maria-Claudia Negrea, Michel P Hermans
{"title":"Short-term CGM as a tool to optimize glycemic control and defer intensive insulin therapy in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a Belgian real-life study.","authors":"Philippe Oriot, Linh Bui, Noémie Klipper Dit Kurz, Mirela Morisca Gavriliu, Maria-Claudia Negrea, Michel P Hermans","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2025.2528030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) benefits type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), but its role in non-intensive insulin therapy remains underexplored. This study evaluates whether a short-term CGM non-blinded can postpone the escalation to multiple daily insulin injections in people with poorly controlled T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective real-world study analyzed data from 309 adults with T2D in primary care who used a 10 or 14-day CGM (2020-2024). The primary objective was to assess CGM's impact on therapy escalation, particularly to MDI. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting the intensification of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 309 participants (median age: 65 [56-73] years, diabetes duration: 16 [11-23] years, baseline HbA1c: 8.6% [70 mmol/mol]), 91.3% were deemed unsuitable for MDI based on CGM results (non-MDI GLT group, <i>n</i> = 282). In this group, 76% achieved an HbA1c-GMI differential > 0.5%, and 54% >1.0% after 14 day-CGM. Basal insulin use decreased slightly (70% to 64%, <i>p</i> = 0.13), while twice-daily insulin increased (12% to 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). GLTs remained largely unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A short-term CGM prevented MDI escalation in 91.3% of poorly controlled T2D adults, reinforcing its role as a cost-effective strategy. CGM likely improved self-management behaviors, as evidenced by frequent HbA1c-GMI differentials, reflecting better management of hyperglycemia. These findings highlight CGM as a practical behavioral and therapeutic tool in diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2025.2528030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) benefits type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), but its role in non-intensive insulin therapy remains underexplored. This study evaluates whether a short-term CGM non-blinded can postpone the escalation to multiple daily insulin injections in people with poorly controlled T2D.

Methods: This retrospective real-world study analyzed data from 309 adults with T2D in primary care who used a 10 or 14-day CGM (2020-2024). The primary objective was to assess CGM's impact on therapy escalation, particularly to MDI. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting the intensification of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT).

Results: Among the 309 participants (median age: 65 [56-73] years, diabetes duration: 16 [11-23] years, baseline HbA1c: 8.6% [70 mmol/mol]), 91.3% were deemed unsuitable for MDI based on CGM results (non-MDI GLT group, n = 282). In this group, 76% achieved an HbA1c-GMI differential > 0.5%, and 54% >1.0% after 14 day-CGM. Basal insulin use decreased slightly (70% to 64%, p = 0.13), while twice-daily insulin increased (12% to 18%, p = 0.02). GLTs remained largely unchanged.

Conclusion: A short-term CGM prevented MDI escalation in 91.3% of poorly controlled T2D adults, reinforcing its role as a cost-effective strategy. CGM likely improved self-management behaviors, as evidenced by frequent HbA1c-GMI differentials, reflecting better management of hyperglycemia. These findings highlight CGM as a practical behavioral and therapeutic tool in diabetes care.

短期CGM作为优化血糖控制和延迟2型糖尿病患者强化胰岛素治疗的工具:比利时的一项现实研究
目的:持续血糖监测(CGM)对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者每日多次胰岛素注射(MDI)有益,但其在非强化胰岛素治疗中的作用尚不清楚。本研究评估短期非盲CGM是否可以延缓t2dm控制不良患者每日多次胰岛素注射的升级。方法:这项回顾性现实世界研究分析了309名在初级保健中使用10或14天CGM(2020-2024)的成年T2D患者的数据。主要目的是评估CGM对治疗升级的影响,特别是对MDI的影响。次要目的是确定预测降糖治疗(GLT)强化的因素。结果:在309名参与者(中位年龄:65[56-73]岁,糖尿病病程:16[11-23]年,基线HbA1c: 8.6% [70 mmol/mol])中,基于CGM结果,91.3%被认为不适合MDI(非MDI GLT组,n = 282)。在该组中,经过14天的cgm后,76%的患者HbA1c-GMI差异达到了0.5%,54%的患者达到了1.0%。基础胰岛素使用略有下降(70%至64%,p = 0.13),而每日两次胰岛素使用增加(12%至18%,p = 0.02)。GLTs基本保持不变。结论:在91.3%控制不良的t2dm成人中,短期CGM可防止MDI升级,强化了其作为成本效益策略的作用。正如频繁的HbA1c-GMI差异所证明的那样,CGM可能改善了自我管理行为,反映了对高血糖的更好管理。这些发现强调了CGM在糖尿病护理中作为一种实用的行为和治疗工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信