Fadoua Laasri, Navid Mostoufi, Adrian Carrillo Garcia, Jamal Chaouki
{"title":"Simulation of a bubbling fluidized bed reactor for phosphogypsum decomposition with carbon monoxide","authors":"Fadoua Laasri, Navid Mostoufi, Adrian Carrillo Garcia, Jamal Chaouki","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Phosphogypsum (PG), a by-product of the phosphoric acid industry and rich in calcium sulphate (CaSO<sub>4</sub>), has an unfavourable environmental impact, making its management one of the crucial issues of phosphoric acid production. As a result, PG production is integrated with or without treatment in many industries, such as agriculture, building materials, and sulphuric acid. In the latter application, carbon monoxide (CO) is used to decompose PG to extract the sulphur according to a two-parallel reaction producing calcium sulphide (CaS) and calcium monoxide (CaO) in the solid phase. To depict the effect of the solid temperature (<i>T</i>), CO partial pressure (<i>P</i><sub>CO</sub>), inlet gas velocity (<i>U</i><sub>0</sub>), residence time (<span></span><math>\n <mi>τ</mi></math>), particle size (PS), and solid exchange coefficient (<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msub></math>) on the overall fluidized bed reactor performance, a simulation study was performed according to the dynamic two-phase model. The results show that CO partial pressure, solid residence time, particle size, and inlet gas velocity have the most significant effect on the PG conversion. On the other hand, the temperature and partial pressure of CO have the most critical effect on product selectivity. The concentration profiles of both reactants CaSO<sub>4</sub> and CO reveal that the reaction in the emulsion phase is faster than in the bubble phase due to the good mixing in this phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"103 8","pages":"3555-3567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phosphogypsum (PG), a by-product of the phosphoric acid industry and rich in calcium sulphate (CaSO4), has an unfavourable environmental impact, making its management one of the crucial issues of phosphoric acid production. As a result, PG production is integrated with or without treatment in many industries, such as agriculture, building materials, and sulphuric acid. In the latter application, carbon monoxide (CO) is used to decompose PG to extract the sulphur according to a two-parallel reaction producing calcium sulphide (CaS) and calcium monoxide (CaO) in the solid phase. To depict the effect of the solid temperature (T), CO partial pressure (PCO), inlet gas velocity (U0), residence time (), particle size (PS), and solid exchange coefficient () on the overall fluidized bed reactor performance, a simulation study was performed according to the dynamic two-phase model. The results show that CO partial pressure, solid residence time, particle size, and inlet gas velocity have the most significant effect on the PG conversion. On the other hand, the temperature and partial pressure of CO have the most critical effect on product selectivity. The concentration profiles of both reactants CaSO4 and CO reveal that the reaction in the emulsion phase is faster than in the bubble phase due to the good mixing in this phase.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.