{"title":"Grassland Yield Gaps and Their Impact on the Contribution to Food Security of Walloon Dairy Farms","authors":"Caroline Battheu-Noirfalise, Benoit Wyzen, Yves Beckers, Eric Froidmont, Didier Stilmant, Alexandre Mertens","doi":"10.1111/gfs.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Current livestock systems are often criticised for their competition with food and land, but they are rarely compared to optimised livestock systems in this matter. The net productivity indicator offers insights into potential improvements. We calibrated a process-based grass growth model (LINGRA-N-Plus) for Walloon grasslands and coupled its output with an animal production model to estimate the potential net productivity achievable on commercial dairy farms in two grassland regions of Wallonia. Three mowing regimes (4C, 5C, and G), three nitrogen (N) fertilisation rates (90N, 225N, and 360N), and two energy corrections (sugar beet pulp or wheat) were tested for the years 2016–2020. Our results showed that potential net productivity ranged from 49% (4C.4C and 90N, grass-only) to 166% (5C.G and 360N, grass + sugar beet pulp) of the current farm sample productivity (267 ± 64 kg HDP ha<sup>−1</sup>). Notably, similar performance (108% for 5C.G at 225N with sugar beet pulp) could be achieved by commercial farms with lower fertilisation rates than they currently use (285 ± 93 kg N), indicating room for improvement in N use. The variability in potential net productivity was mainly driven by mowing regime and fertilisation rate rather than soil and climate, emphasising management improvements. This suggests the possibility of setting regional net productivity targets. The developed model can guide discussions with farmers on enhancing their contribution to food security.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Current livestock systems are often criticised for their competition with food and land, but they are rarely compared to optimised livestock systems in this matter. The net productivity indicator offers insights into potential improvements. We calibrated a process-based grass growth model (LINGRA-N-Plus) for Walloon grasslands and coupled its output with an animal production model to estimate the potential net productivity achievable on commercial dairy farms in two grassland regions of Wallonia. Three mowing regimes (4C, 5C, and G), three nitrogen (N) fertilisation rates (90N, 225N, and 360N), and two energy corrections (sugar beet pulp or wheat) were tested for the years 2016–2020. Our results showed that potential net productivity ranged from 49% (4C.4C and 90N, grass-only) to 166% (5C.G and 360N, grass + sugar beet pulp) of the current farm sample productivity (267 ± 64 kg HDP ha−1). Notably, similar performance (108% for 5C.G at 225N with sugar beet pulp) could be achieved by commercial farms with lower fertilisation rates than they currently use (285 ± 93 kg N), indicating room for improvement in N use. The variability in potential net productivity was mainly driven by mowing regime and fertilisation rate rather than soil and climate, emphasising management improvements. This suggests the possibility of setting regional net productivity targets. The developed model can guide discussions with farmers on enhancing their contribution to food security.
目前的畜牧业系统经常因与粮食和土地竞争而受到批评,但在这方面很少与优化的畜牧业系统进行比较。净生产率指标提供了对潜在改进的洞察。我们为瓦隆草原校准了一个基于过程的草生长模型(linga - n - plus),并将其产量与动物生产模型相结合,以估计瓦隆两个草原地区商业奶牛场可实现的潜在净生产力。在2016-2020年测试了三种刈割制度(4C、5C和G)、三种氮肥(90N、225N和360N)和两种能量校正(甜菜浆或小麦)。我们的研究结果表明,潜在的净生产率范围为49% (4C)。4C和90N,仅草)到166% (5C。G和360N,草+甜菜浆)当前农场样品生产力(267±64 kg HDP ha−1)。值得注意的是,5C的性能也差不多(108%)。在225N(使用甜菜浆)下,商业农场可以用比目前使用的(285±93公斤N)更低的施肥率来实现G,这表明氮的使用有改进的空间。潜在净生产力的变化主要是由刈割制度和施肥率驱动的,而不是由土壤和气候驱动的,强调管理的改进。这表明有可能制定区域净生产率目标。开发的模型可以指导与农民讨论如何加强他们对粮食安全的贡献。
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.