How Do Coworkers Interpret Employee AI Usage: Coworkers' Perceived Morality and Helping as Responses to Employee AI Usage

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Xiang Zhou, Chen Chen, Wanlu Li, Yuewei Yao, Fangming Cai, Jieming Xu, Xin Qin
{"title":"How Do Coworkers Interpret Employee AI Usage: Coworkers' Perceived Morality and Helping as Responses to Employee AI Usage","authors":"Xiang Zhou,&nbsp;Chen Chen,&nbsp;Wanlu Li,&nbsp;Yuewei Yao,&nbsp;Fangming Cai,&nbsp;Jieming Xu,&nbsp;Xin Qin","doi":"10.1002/hrm.22299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Organizations are increasingly introducing artificial intelligence (AI) into the workplace and encouraging employees to use AI to complete work. Correspondingly, research on AI usage predominantly focuses on the positive effects of AI usage on employees themselves. Drawing upon attribution theory and AI literature and taking an interpersonal perspective, this research challenges the prevailing consensus by investigating whether, when, and how employee AI usage would lead to negative coworker outcomes. We propose that when coworkers attribute employee AI usage as a way to slack off (i.e., slack attribution), employee AI usage is negatively related to coworkers' perceived morality of the employee, which in turn decreases coworkers' helping behavior toward the employee. Two experimental studies, a field survey study, and a field experiment provide substantial support for our hypotheses. This research adds new insights into the AI usage literature by revealing the negative coworker outcomes of employee AI usage.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48310,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management","volume":"64 4","pages":"1077-1097"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.22299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly introducing artificial intelligence (AI) into the workplace and encouraging employees to use AI to complete work. Correspondingly, research on AI usage predominantly focuses on the positive effects of AI usage on employees themselves. Drawing upon attribution theory and AI literature and taking an interpersonal perspective, this research challenges the prevailing consensus by investigating whether, when, and how employee AI usage would lead to negative coworker outcomes. We propose that when coworkers attribute employee AI usage as a way to slack off (i.e., slack attribution), employee AI usage is negatively related to coworkers' perceived morality of the employee, which in turn decreases coworkers' helping behavior toward the employee. Two experimental studies, a field survey study, and a field experiment provide substantial support for our hypotheses. This research adds new insights into the AI usage literature by revealing the negative coworker outcomes of employee AI usage.

同事如何解释员工人工智能的使用:同事的感知道德和帮助作为对员工人工智能使用的回应
越来越多的组织将人工智能(AI)引入工作场所,并鼓励员工使用AI完成工作。相应的,对人工智能使用的研究主要集中在人工智能使用对员工自身的积极影响上。本研究借鉴归因理论和人工智能文献,并从人际关系的角度出发,通过调查员工使用人工智能是否、何时以及如何导致消极的同事结果,挑战了普遍的共识。我们提出,当同事将员工人工智能的使用归因于一种偷懒的方式(即懈怠归因)时,员工人工智能的使用与同事对员工道德的感知负相关,这反过来又减少了同事对员工的帮助行为。两项实验研究,一项实地调查研究和一项实地实验为我们的假设提供了实质性的支持。这项研究通过揭示员工使用人工智能对同事的负面影响,为人工智能使用文献增添了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Covering the broad spectrum of contemporary human resource management, this journal provides academics and practicing managers with the latest concepts, tools, and information for effective problem solving and decision making in this field. Broad in scope, it explores issues of societal, organizational, and individual relevance. Journal articles discuss new theories, new techniques, case studies, models, and research trends of particular significance to practicing HR managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信