Analysis of biomass as a feedstock in a chemical looping-based polygeneration process for CO2 valorization

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Nimish Pankhedkar, Sushma Sunkara, Abhishek Dwivedi, Ravindra Gudi, Pratim Biswas, Suresh Bhargava
{"title":"Analysis of biomass as a feedstock in a chemical looping-based polygeneration process for CO2 valorization","authors":"Nimish Pankhedkar,&nbsp;Sushma Sunkara,&nbsp;Abhishek Dwivedi,&nbsp;Ravindra Gudi,&nbsp;Pratim Biswas,&nbsp;Suresh Bhargava","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>From the viewpoint of circular economy, the utilization of biomass as a preferred feedstock for power generation with carbon capture has become prevalent. Biomass utilization leads to a carbon-neutral balance by leveraging its inherent carbon that was absorbed from the atmosphere. While chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a promising carbon capture technology for solid fuels such as coal, this paper further explores the feasibility of using biomass in CLC along with valorization of CO<sub>2</sub> to valuable chemicals. A polygeneration approach utilizing biomass has been proposed to produce power and value-added chemicals (methanol and dimethyl ether [DME]), thus yielding an integrated CO<sub>2</sub> capture and utilization system. Biomass has a significant amount of oxygen and a higher H:C ratio than conventional fuels like coal. The effect of the same has been analyzed by assessing biomass as a feedstock in the proposed process and evaluating the effect of higher oxygen content towards the objective of CO<sub>2</sub> valorization relative to that of coal. Furthermore, a comparative discussion of the suitability of biomass compared to coal from a valorization perspective has been presented. Detailed techno-feasibility analysis on the schemes and optimization studies to maximize the performance of the system in terms of energetics, CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation, and profitability has been conducted. From the analysis, it has been identified that the utilization of biomass as a feedstock in CLC-based processes results in higher chemical production rates and higher profits with lesser CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than coal. The above analysis and evaluation has been carried out through simulations using Aspen Plus® software.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"103 8","pages":"3568-3588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the viewpoint of circular economy, the utilization of biomass as a preferred feedstock for power generation with carbon capture has become prevalent. Biomass utilization leads to a carbon-neutral balance by leveraging its inherent carbon that was absorbed from the atmosphere. While chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a promising carbon capture technology for solid fuels such as coal, this paper further explores the feasibility of using biomass in CLC along with valorization of CO2 to valuable chemicals. A polygeneration approach utilizing biomass has been proposed to produce power and value-added chemicals (methanol and dimethyl ether [DME]), thus yielding an integrated CO2 capture and utilization system. Biomass has a significant amount of oxygen and a higher H:C ratio than conventional fuels like coal. The effect of the same has been analyzed by assessing biomass as a feedstock in the proposed process and evaluating the effect of higher oxygen content towards the objective of CO2 valorization relative to that of coal. Furthermore, a comparative discussion of the suitability of biomass compared to coal from a valorization perspective has been presented. Detailed techno-feasibility analysis on the schemes and optimization studies to maximize the performance of the system in terms of energetics, CO2 mitigation, and profitability has been conducted. From the analysis, it has been identified that the utilization of biomass as a feedstock in CLC-based processes results in higher chemical production rates and higher profits with lesser CO2 emissions than coal. The above analysis and evaluation has been carried out through simulations using Aspen Plus® software.

Abstract Image

生物质作为原料在基于化学环的多代过程中的CO2增值分析
从循环经济的角度来看,利用生物质作为碳捕获发电的首选原料已经变得普遍。生物质利用通过利用其从大气中吸收的固有碳来实现碳中和平衡。虽然化学环燃烧(CLC)是一种很有前途的固体燃料(如煤)碳捕获技术,但本文进一步探讨了在CLC中使用生物质以及二氧化碳向有价值化学品的增值的可行性。提出了一种利用生物质的多联产方法来生产电力和增值化学品(甲醇和二甲醚[DME]),从而产生一个集成的二氧化碳捕获和利用系统。与煤等传统燃料相比,生物质含有大量的氧气和更高的氢碳比。通过评估生物质作为拟议过程中的原料,以及评估相对于煤的高氧含量对二氧化碳增值目标的影响,分析了相同的效果。此外,从定价的角度对生物质与煤炭的适用性进行了比较讨论。对方案进行了详细的技术可行性分析,并进行了优化研究,以最大限度地提高系统在能量学、二氧化碳减排和盈利能力方面的性能。从分析中可以看出,在基于clc的过程中,利用生物质作为原料可以获得更高的化学品生产率和更高的利润,而二氧化碳排放量却比煤炭少。上述分析和评价是通过Aspen Plus®软件进行仿真的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信