Yulian Wang MS, Guangqi Li MS, Weimao Kong MS, Jianxia Hu MD, Longnv Bao MS, Xingzhu Pan MS, Xueqing Li MS, Jigang Wang MD, PhD
{"title":"DICER1 mutations in Bethesda category II, III, and IV thyroid nodules: A mutually exclusive relationship with BRAFV600E mutation","authors":"Yulian Wang MS, Guangqi Li MS, Weimao Kong MS, Jianxia Hu MD, Longnv Bao MS, Xingzhu Pan MS, Xueqing Li MS, Jigang Wang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncy.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and cytological features of <i>Dicer 1</i>, <i>Ribonuclease III</i> (<i>DICER</i>)-mutant fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda II, III, and IV categories. The authors also sought to explore the relationship between <i>DICER1</i> and <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> mutations in Bethesda III thyroid nodules.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The authors collected a series of consecutive FNA cases diagnosed as Bethesda category II, III, and IV from a medical center over the course of 1 year. <i>DICER1</i> exons 24 and 25 and <i>TERT</i> promoter mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing in all cases, and <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> mutations were detected by amplification refractory mutation system PCR in Bethesda III and IV cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 899 patients were included in the study. <i>DICER1</i> mutations were identified in 52 patients: 20 in Bethesda category II (6.2%, 20 of 322), 25 in Bethesda category III (4.9%, 25 of 510), and seven in Bethesda category IV (10.4%, 7 of 67). Among the 510 Bethesda III FNA samples, 76 harbored the <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> mutation and 25 harbored <i>DICER1</i> mutations. <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> and <i>DICER1</i> mutations were mutually exclusive. In Bethesda category II and III cases, patients with <i>DICER1</i>-mutant nodules were younger and had larger nodule volumes compared to those without <i>DICER1</i> mutations. All <i>DICER1</i>-mutant Bethesda III FNAs were classified as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)-other. <i>TERT</i> promoter mutations (c. -118G>T and c. -144 C>T) were identified in two FNA samples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this study suggest that <i>DICER1</i>-mutant nodules are unlikely to be <i>BRAF</i>-mutant carcinomas. Further study of the molecular characteristics of <i>DICER1</i>-mutant FNAs will contribute to more accurate cytological diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":"133 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and cytological features of Dicer 1, Ribonuclease III (DICER)-mutant fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda II, III, and IV categories. The authors also sought to explore the relationship between DICER1 and BRAFV600E mutations in Bethesda III thyroid nodules.
Methods
The authors collected a series of consecutive FNA cases diagnosed as Bethesda category II, III, and IV from a medical center over the course of 1 year. DICER1 exons 24 and 25 and TERT promoter mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing in all cases, and BRAFV600E mutations were detected by amplification refractory mutation system PCR in Bethesda III and IV cases.
Results
A total of 899 patients were included in the study. DICER1 mutations were identified in 52 patients: 20 in Bethesda category II (6.2%, 20 of 322), 25 in Bethesda category III (4.9%, 25 of 510), and seven in Bethesda category IV (10.4%, 7 of 67). Among the 510 Bethesda III FNA samples, 76 harbored the BRAFV600E mutation and 25 harbored DICER1 mutations. BRAFV600E and DICER1 mutations were mutually exclusive. In Bethesda category II and III cases, patients with DICER1-mutant nodules were younger and had larger nodule volumes compared to those without DICER1 mutations. All DICER1-mutant Bethesda III FNAs were classified as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)-other. TERT promoter mutations (c. -118G>T and c. -144 C>T) were identified in two FNA samples.
Conclusion
The findings of this study suggest that DICER1-mutant nodules are unlikely to be BRAF-mutant carcinomas. Further study of the molecular characteristics of DICER1-mutant FNAs will contribute to more accurate cytological diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.