Global Patterns and Drivers of Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities in Response to Plant Invasion: A Meta-Analysis

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Xin Chen, Ji Chen, Johannes J. Le Roux, Mark van Kleunen, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Linchuan Fang, Dehong Hu, Tianning Fan, Yi Liu, Lifei Su, Yiqi Luo, Junji Cao, Yong Zhou, Robert L. Sinsabaugh, Min Luo
{"title":"Global Patterns and Drivers of Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities in Response to Plant Invasion: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Xin Chen,&nbsp;Ji Chen,&nbsp;Johannes J. Le Roux,&nbsp;Mark van Kleunen,&nbsp;Kees Jan van Groenigen,&nbsp;Linchuan Fang,&nbsp;Dehong Hu,&nbsp;Tianning Fan,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Lifei Su,&nbsp;Yiqi Luo,&nbsp;Junji Cao,&nbsp;Yong Zhou,&nbsp;Robert L. Sinsabaugh,&nbsp;Min Luo","doi":"10.1111/geb.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Plant invasion is a major global environmental challenge. While invasive plants can potentially enhance soil nutrient availability by stimulating soil extracellular enzyme activities, empirical studies have yielded conflicting results. A comprehensive understanding of global patterns and underlying drivers is therefore essential for inferring generalities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>2000–2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Invasive plants and soil microorganisms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a meta-analysis on 635 observations from 117 studies worldwide, investigating the effect of plant invasion on 11 soil carbon (C)-, nitrogen (N)- and phosphorus (P)-acquiring enzyme activities. We also analysed how environmental drivers and ecosystem types modulated these responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Plant invasion significantly increased hydrolytic C-, N- and P-acquiring enzyme activities by 18% (11%–27%), 29% (22%–37%), and 32% (24%–41%), respectively, while it had no significant effects on oxidative enzyme activities. These enzymatic responses were primarily driven by elevated dissolved organic carbon and soil moisture content, coupled with decreased fungal/bacterial ratios under invasion. The most pronounced enzymatic responses occurred in neutral and alkaline soils during the early stages of invasion and when invasive plants formed mycorrhizal associations. Different ecosystem types displayed distinct enzymatic responses to plant invasion: grasslands showed elevated N-acquiring enzyme activities, wetlands exhibited enhanced P-acquiring enzyme activities, croplands demonstrated increases across all hydrolytic enzyme classes, while woodlands displayed modest enzymatic responses to invasion compared to other ecosystem types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found that (i) plant invasion consistently increased hydrolytic enzyme activities while it had negligible effects on the activities of oxidative enzymes; (ii) enzymatic responses to invasion were modulated by ambient soil pH, invader mycorrhizal status and invasion duration; and (iii) invasive plants enhanced soil nutrient availability across ecosystem types through different impacts on enzyme activities. These findings provided mechanistic insights into plant invasion success and advanced our predictive capacity for invasion impacts on biogeochemical processes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Plant invasion is a major global environmental challenge. While invasive plants can potentially enhance soil nutrient availability by stimulating soil extracellular enzyme activities, empirical studies have yielded conflicting results. A comprehensive understanding of global patterns and underlying drivers is therefore essential for inferring generalities.

Location

Global.

Time Period

2000–2025.

Major Taxa Studied

Invasive plants and soil microorganisms.

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis on 635 observations from 117 studies worldwide, investigating the effect of plant invasion on 11 soil carbon (C)-, nitrogen (N)- and phosphorus (P)-acquiring enzyme activities. We also analysed how environmental drivers and ecosystem types modulated these responses.

Results

Plant invasion significantly increased hydrolytic C-, N- and P-acquiring enzyme activities by 18% (11%–27%), 29% (22%–37%), and 32% (24%–41%), respectively, while it had no significant effects on oxidative enzyme activities. These enzymatic responses were primarily driven by elevated dissolved organic carbon and soil moisture content, coupled with decreased fungal/bacterial ratios under invasion. The most pronounced enzymatic responses occurred in neutral and alkaline soils during the early stages of invasion and when invasive plants formed mycorrhizal associations. Different ecosystem types displayed distinct enzymatic responses to plant invasion: grasslands showed elevated N-acquiring enzyme activities, wetlands exhibited enhanced P-acquiring enzyme activities, croplands demonstrated increases across all hydrolytic enzyme classes, while woodlands displayed modest enzymatic responses to invasion compared to other ecosystem types.

Main Conclusions

We found that (i) plant invasion consistently increased hydrolytic enzyme activities while it had negligible effects on the activities of oxidative enzymes; (ii) enzymatic responses to invasion were modulated by ambient soil pH, invader mycorrhizal status and invasion duration; and (iii) invasive plants enhanced soil nutrient availability across ecosystem types through different impacts on enzyme activities. These findings provided mechanistic insights into plant invasion success and advanced our predictive capacity for invasion impacts on biogeochemical processes.

Abstract Image

响应植物入侵的全球土壤胞外酶活性模式和驱动因素:荟萃分析
目的植物入侵是一个重大的全球性环境挑战。虽然入侵植物可以通过刺激土壤胞外酶活性来潜在地提高土壤养分有效性,但实证研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。因此,对全局模式和潜在驱动因素的全面理解对于推断一般性是必不可少的。位置 全球。时间范围2000-2025年。主要分类群研究入侵植物和土壤微生物。方法对全球117项研究的635项观测结果进行meta分析,探讨植物入侵对11种土壤碳(C)-、氮(N)-和磷(P)获取酶活性的影响。我们还分析了环境驱动因素和生态系统类型如何调节这些反应。结果植物入侵显著提高了水解酶C、N和p获取酶活性,分别提高了18%(11% ~ 27%)、29%(22% ~ 37%)和32%(24% ~ 41%),而对氧化酶活性无显著影响。这些酶促反应主要是由溶解有机碳和土壤水分含量的升高以及入侵后真菌/细菌比例的降低所驱动的。在中性和碱性土壤中,最明显的酶促反应发生在入侵的早期阶段和入侵植物形成菌根关联的时候。不同的生态系统类型对植物入侵表现出不同的酶反应:草地表现出较高的n获取酶活性,湿地表现出增强的p获取酶活性,农田表现出所有水解酶类的增加,而林地对入侵的酶反应与其他生态系统类型相比表现出适度的酶反应。研究发现:(1)植物入侵持续提高水解酶活性,而对氧化酶活性的影响可以忽略不计;(ii)酶对入侵的响应受环境土壤pH、入侵菌根状态和入侵时间的调节;(3)入侵植物通过对酶活性的不同影响提高了不同生态系统类型土壤养分有效性。这些发现为植物入侵成功提供了机制上的见解,并提高了我们对入侵对生物地球化学过程影响的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信