Xin Chen, Ji Chen, Johannes J. Le Roux, Mark van Kleunen, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Linchuan Fang, Dehong Hu, Tianning Fan, Yi Liu, Lifei Su, Yiqi Luo, Junji Cao, Yong Zhou, Robert L. Sinsabaugh, Min Luo
{"title":"Global Patterns and Drivers of Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities in Response to Plant Invasion: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Xin Chen, Ji Chen, Johannes J. Le Roux, Mark van Kleunen, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Linchuan Fang, Dehong Hu, Tianning Fan, Yi Liu, Lifei Su, Yiqi Luo, Junji Cao, Yong Zhou, Robert L. Sinsabaugh, Min Luo","doi":"10.1111/geb.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Plant invasion is a major global environmental challenge. While invasive plants can potentially enhance soil nutrient availability by stimulating soil extracellular enzyme activities, empirical studies have yielded conflicting results. A comprehensive understanding of global patterns and underlying drivers is therefore essential for inferring generalities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>2000–2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Invasive plants and soil microorganisms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a meta-analysis on 635 observations from 117 studies worldwide, investigating the effect of plant invasion on 11 soil carbon (C)-, nitrogen (N)- and phosphorus (P)-acquiring enzyme activities. We also analysed how environmental drivers and ecosystem types modulated these responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Plant invasion significantly increased hydrolytic C-, N- and P-acquiring enzyme activities by 18% (11%–27%), 29% (22%–37%), and 32% (24%–41%), respectively, while it had no significant effects on oxidative enzyme activities. These enzymatic responses were primarily driven by elevated dissolved organic carbon and soil moisture content, coupled with decreased fungal/bacterial ratios under invasion. The most pronounced enzymatic responses occurred in neutral and alkaline soils during the early stages of invasion and when invasive plants formed mycorrhizal associations. Different ecosystem types displayed distinct enzymatic responses to plant invasion: grasslands showed elevated N-acquiring enzyme activities, wetlands exhibited enhanced P-acquiring enzyme activities, croplands demonstrated increases across all hydrolytic enzyme classes, while woodlands displayed modest enzymatic responses to invasion compared to other ecosystem types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found that (i) plant invasion consistently increased hydrolytic enzyme activities while it had negligible effects on the activities of oxidative enzymes; (ii) enzymatic responses to invasion were modulated by ambient soil pH, invader mycorrhizal status and invasion duration; and (iii) invasive plants enhanced soil nutrient availability across ecosystem types through different impacts on enzyme activities. These findings provided mechanistic insights into plant invasion success and advanced our predictive capacity for invasion impacts on biogeochemical processes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Plant invasion is a major global environmental challenge. While invasive plants can potentially enhance soil nutrient availability by stimulating soil extracellular enzyme activities, empirical studies have yielded conflicting results. A comprehensive understanding of global patterns and underlying drivers is therefore essential for inferring generalities.
Location
Global.
Time Period
2000–2025.
Major Taxa Studied
Invasive plants and soil microorganisms.
Methods
We conducted a meta-analysis on 635 observations from 117 studies worldwide, investigating the effect of plant invasion on 11 soil carbon (C)-, nitrogen (N)- and phosphorus (P)-acquiring enzyme activities. We also analysed how environmental drivers and ecosystem types modulated these responses.
Results
Plant invasion significantly increased hydrolytic C-, N- and P-acquiring enzyme activities by 18% (11%–27%), 29% (22%–37%), and 32% (24%–41%), respectively, while it had no significant effects on oxidative enzyme activities. These enzymatic responses were primarily driven by elevated dissolved organic carbon and soil moisture content, coupled with decreased fungal/bacterial ratios under invasion. The most pronounced enzymatic responses occurred in neutral and alkaline soils during the early stages of invasion and when invasive plants formed mycorrhizal associations. Different ecosystem types displayed distinct enzymatic responses to plant invasion: grasslands showed elevated N-acquiring enzyme activities, wetlands exhibited enhanced P-acquiring enzyme activities, croplands demonstrated increases across all hydrolytic enzyme classes, while woodlands displayed modest enzymatic responses to invasion compared to other ecosystem types.
Main Conclusions
We found that (i) plant invasion consistently increased hydrolytic enzyme activities while it had negligible effects on the activities of oxidative enzymes; (ii) enzymatic responses to invasion were modulated by ambient soil pH, invader mycorrhizal status and invasion duration; and (iii) invasive plants enhanced soil nutrient availability across ecosystem types through different impacts on enzyme activities. These findings provided mechanistic insights into plant invasion success and advanced our predictive capacity for invasion impacts on biogeochemical processes.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.