Feibiao Shan, Le Liu, Ling Li, Wenle Wang, Yaqiong Bi, Minhui Li
{"title":"Management, Safety, and Efficacy Evaluation of Nutraceutical and Functional Food: A Global Perspective","authors":"Feibiao Shan, Le Liu, Ling Li, Wenle Wang, Yaqiong Bi, Minhui Li","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing health consciousness and aging populations have driven surging demand for traditional and complementary medicines (T&CM), including nutraceuticals, functional foods, and food and medicinal substances (FAMS). Chronic disease burdens and preventive healthcare trends further amplify this growth. However, fragmented regulatory frameworks, inconsistent definitions, and divergent safety evaluation systems across regions hinder global trade and consumer trust. This review compares T&CM governance in China, the United States, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Russia, African nations, and faith-based Kosher/Halal certification systems, analyzing legislative milestones and risk management models. Key disparities exist in standardization, ingredient approvals, and evidence requirements. While Asia and the West maintain robust regulations, African countries struggle to align traditional practices with modern safety standards. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI)-powered quality control, multi-omics-based validation, and blockchain traceability are critical for ensuring the safety and efficacy of T&CM. The analysis underscores the urgent need for an internationally harmonized regulatory framework, supported by strategic positive/negative ingredient lists and cross-border cooperation. Policy recommendations emphasize integrating traditional knowledge with scientific validation to optimize market accessibility while ensuring consumer safety. This study's novel contribution lies in its systematic evaluation of T&CM's role in bridging cultural heritage with global public health, offering actionable insights for policymakers to foster equitable trade and innovation in the wellness industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing health consciousness and aging populations have driven surging demand for traditional and complementary medicines (T&CM), including nutraceuticals, functional foods, and food and medicinal substances (FAMS). Chronic disease burdens and preventive healthcare trends further amplify this growth. However, fragmented regulatory frameworks, inconsistent definitions, and divergent safety evaluation systems across regions hinder global trade and consumer trust. This review compares T&CM governance in China, the United States, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Russia, African nations, and faith-based Kosher/Halal certification systems, analyzing legislative milestones and risk management models. Key disparities exist in standardization, ingredient approvals, and evidence requirements. While Asia and the West maintain robust regulations, African countries struggle to align traditional practices with modern safety standards. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI)-powered quality control, multi-omics-based validation, and blockchain traceability are critical for ensuring the safety and efficacy of T&CM. The analysis underscores the urgent need for an internationally harmonized regulatory framework, supported by strategic positive/negative ingredient lists and cross-border cooperation. Policy recommendations emphasize integrating traditional knowledge with scientific validation to optimize market accessibility while ensuring consumer safety. This study's novel contribution lies in its systematic evaluation of T&CM's role in bridging cultural heritage with global public health, offering actionable insights for policymakers to foster equitable trade and innovation in the wellness industry.
期刊介绍:
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology.
CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results.
Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity.
The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.