Management, Safety, and Efficacy Evaluation of Nutraceutical and Functional Food: A Global Perspective

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Feibiao Shan, Le Liu, Ling Li, Wenle Wang, Yaqiong Bi, Minhui Li
{"title":"Management, Safety, and Efficacy Evaluation of Nutraceutical and Functional Food: A Global Perspective","authors":"Feibiao Shan,&nbsp;Le Liu,&nbsp;Ling Li,&nbsp;Wenle Wang,&nbsp;Yaqiong Bi,&nbsp;Minhui Li","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing health consciousness and aging populations have driven surging demand for traditional and complementary medicines (T&amp;CM), including nutraceuticals, functional foods, and food and medicinal substances (FAMS). Chronic disease burdens and preventive healthcare trends further amplify this growth. However, fragmented regulatory frameworks, inconsistent definitions, and divergent safety evaluation systems across regions hinder global trade and consumer trust. This review compares T&amp;CM governance in China, the United States, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Russia, African nations, and faith-based Kosher/Halal certification systems, analyzing legislative milestones and risk management models. Key disparities exist in standardization, ingredient approvals, and evidence requirements. While Asia and the West maintain robust regulations, African countries struggle to align traditional practices with modern safety standards. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI)-powered quality control, multi-omics-based validation, and blockchain traceability are critical for ensuring the safety and efficacy of T&amp;CM. The analysis underscores the urgent need for an internationally harmonized regulatory framework, supported by strategic positive/negative ingredient lists and cross-border cooperation. Policy recommendations emphasize integrating traditional knowledge with scientific validation to optimize market accessibility while ensuring consumer safety. This study's novel contribution lies in its systematic evaluation of T&amp;CM's role in bridging cultural heritage with global public health, offering actionable insights for policymakers to foster equitable trade and innovation in the wellness industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing health consciousness and aging populations have driven surging demand for traditional and complementary medicines (T&CM), including nutraceuticals, functional foods, and food and medicinal substances (FAMS). Chronic disease burdens and preventive healthcare trends further amplify this growth. However, fragmented regulatory frameworks, inconsistent definitions, and divergent safety evaluation systems across regions hinder global trade and consumer trust. This review compares T&CM governance in China, the United States, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Russia, African nations, and faith-based Kosher/Halal certification systems, analyzing legislative milestones and risk management models. Key disparities exist in standardization, ingredient approvals, and evidence requirements. While Asia and the West maintain robust regulations, African countries struggle to align traditional practices with modern safety standards. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI)-powered quality control, multi-omics-based validation, and blockchain traceability are critical for ensuring the safety and efficacy of T&CM. The analysis underscores the urgent need for an internationally harmonized regulatory framework, supported by strategic positive/negative ingredient lists and cross-border cooperation. Policy recommendations emphasize integrating traditional knowledge with scientific validation to optimize market accessibility while ensuring consumer safety. This study's novel contribution lies in its systematic evaluation of T&CM's role in bridging cultural heritage with global public health, offering actionable insights for policymakers to foster equitable trade and innovation in the wellness industry.

Abstract Image

营养保健和功能食品的管理、安全和功效评价:全球视角
日益增长的健康意识和人口老龄化推动了对传统和补充药物(T&;CM)的需求激增,包括保健品、功能食品和食品和药物(FAMS)。慢性病负担和预防性保健趋势进一步扩大了这一增长。然而,分散的监管框架、不一致的定义和不同地区的安全评估系统阻碍了全球贸易和消费者信任。本文比较了中国、美国、欧盟、日本、韩国、澳大利亚、印度、俄罗斯、非洲国家和基于信仰的Kosher/Halal认证体系的食品安全管理,分析了立法里程碑和风险管理模式。主要差异存在于标准化、成分批准和证据要求方面。亚洲和西方国家保持着强有力的监管,而非洲国家则努力将传统做法与现代安全标准结合起来。新兴技术,如人工智能(AI)驱动的质量控制、基于多组学的验证和区块链可追溯性,对于确保T&;CM的安全性和有效性至关重要。该分析强调,迫切需要建立一个国际统一的监管框架,并以战略性积极/消极成分清单和跨境合作为支持。政策建议强调将传统知识与科学验证相结合,以优化市场准入,同时确保消费者安全。本研究的新颖贡献在于系统地评估了传统医学在文化遗产与全球公共卫生之间的桥梁作用,为政策制定者提供了可行的见解,以促进健康产业的公平贸易和创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信