Ilona Croy , Julia Überschär , Antonie Louise Bierling
{"title":"Olfactory reference disorder – empirical insights to a new ICD 11 diagnosis","authors":"Ilona Croy , Julia Überschär , Antonie Louise Bierling","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Olfactory reference disorder (ORD) is defined as a persistent preoccupation with the belief of emitting an offensive body odour, even though no actual odour is present. The ICD-11 has newly introduced olfactory reference to the catalogue of mental disorders, however, standardized assessment tools allowing further research on this diagnosis are scarce. The objective of this study was to test the ORD screening tool (ORD-ST), a questionnaire we developed based on the ICD-11 criteria. The ORD-ST, as well as questionnaires on mental health and questionnaires and tests on olfaction were completed by a sample of 279 participants. The ORD-ST identified three underlying factors: conviction of possessing a perceivable body odor, checking and modification of body odor, and social impairment, together explaining 38.6 % of the variance. Retest-reliability over the course of one week was high to acceptable for the social impairment and checking subscales, and low for the conviction subscale. ORD symptoms positively related to anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms, but not to olfactory sensitivity and olfactory attitudes. Based on those findings, we generated the hypothesis for an aetiological model of the olfactory reference disorder, in which the transition from temporary to stable beliefs of emitting a perceivable (and offensive) odor marks the crucial transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"351 ","pages":"Article 116615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517812500263X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Olfactory reference disorder (ORD) is defined as a persistent preoccupation with the belief of emitting an offensive body odour, even though no actual odour is present. The ICD-11 has newly introduced olfactory reference to the catalogue of mental disorders, however, standardized assessment tools allowing further research on this diagnosis are scarce. The objective of this study was to test the ORD screening tool (ORD-ST), a questionnaire we developed based on the ICD-11 criteria. The ORD-ST, as well as questionnaires on mental health and questionnaires and tests on olfaction were completed by a sample of 279 participants. The ORD-ST identified three underlying factors: conviction of possessing a perceivable body odor, checking and modification of body odor, and social impairment, together explaining 38.6 % of the variance. Retest-reliability over the course of one week was high to acceptable for the social impairment and checking subscales, and low for the conviction subscale. ORD symptoms positively related to anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms, but not to olfactory sensitivity and olfactory attitudes. Based on those findings, we generated the hypothesis for an aetiological model of the olfactory reference disorder, in which the transition from temporary to stable beliefs of emitting a perceivable (and offensive) odor marks the crucial transition.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry.
The scope of the journal encompasses:
Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders.
Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders.
Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases.
Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments.
Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders.
Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.