Deciphering the impact mechanisms of cultural ecosystem benefits in urban green spaces: a site-scale analysis integrating environmental perceived characteristics and usage patterns
{"title":"Deciphering the impact mechanisms of cultural ecosystem benefits in urban green spaces: a site-scale analysis integrating environmental perceived characteristics and usage patterns","authors":"Mengyun Chen , Guangsi Lin , Wanqi Zhou , Chongxian Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green spaces (UGS) provide multiple cultural ecosystem benefits (CEB) that are crucial for urban residents’ wellbeing. However, our understanding of the mechanisms influencing CEB in UGS remains limited, affecting our ability to design spaces that provide optimal benefits. This study aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying CEB in UGS at the site scale, using Haizhu National Wetland Park in Guangzhou, China as a case study. We developed a theoretical framework integrating environmental physical characteristics (EPHCs), environmental perceived characteristics (EPECs), and UGS usage patterns as mediating variables between environmental spaces and CEB. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a population sample (n = 1,451) through Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). Results showed that: (1) EPHCs significantly influenced CEB through both direct and indirect pathways mediated by EPECs and UGS usage; (2) Different dimensions of site characteristics affected CEB through distinct mechanisms − EPHCs primarily influenced CEB through visit frequency, while EPECs operated through both parallel mediation (via sociability, coherence, and openness) and serial mediation (through coherence/openness and visit frequency); (3) The impact mechanisms varied significantly across socio-demographic and activity types. Our findings extend the UK NEA’s CEB framework by empirically validating the mediating roles of environmental perception and usage patterns. This study provides evidence-based guidance for UGS design and management to enhance CEB delivery in densely populated urban areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113829"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25007599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban green spaces (UGS) provide multiple cultural ecosystem benefits (CEB) that are crucial for urban residents’ wellbeing. However, our understanding of the mechanisms influencing CEB in UGS remains limited, affecting our ability to design spaces that provide optimal benefits. This study aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying CEB in UGS at the site scale, using Haizhu National Wetland Park in Guangzhou, China as a case study. We developed a theoretical framework integrating environmental physical characteristics (EPHCs), environmental perceived characteristics (EPECs), and UGS usage patterns as mediating variables between environmental spaces and CEB. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a population sample (n = 1,451) through Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). Results showed that: (1) EPHCs significantly influenced CEB through both direct and indirect pathways mediated by EPECs and UGS usage; (2) Different dimensions of site characteristics affected CEB through distinct mechanisms − EPHCs primarily influenced CEB through visit frequency, while EPECs operated through both parallel mediation (via sociability, coherence, and openness) and serial mediation (through coherence/openness and visit frequency); (3) The impact mechanisms varied significantly across socio-demographic and activity types. Our findings extend the UK NEA’s CEB framework by empirically validating the mediating roles of environmental perception and usage patterns. This study provides evidence-based guidance for UGS design and management to enhance CEB delivery in densely populated urban areas.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.