Tendencia, colaboración e impacto en la producción científica sobre el aprendizaje basado en simulación durante la formación médica

Q2 Social Sciences
John Barja-Ore , Jhonny Jesús Chafloque Chavesta , Zaida Zagaceta-Guevara , Brandon E. Guillen-Calle
{"title":"Tendencia, colaboración e impacto en la producción científica sobre el aprendizaje basado en simulación durante la formación médica","authors":"John Barja-Ore ,&nbsp;Jhonny Jesús Chafloque Chavesta ,&nbsp;Zaida Zagaceta-Guevara ,&nbsp;Brandon E. Guillen-Calle","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Simulation-based learning (SBL) has become a key tool in medical education by providing safe, realistic, and immersive experiences that strengthen students' clinical competencies. Despite its benefits, it faces challenges such as high costs and limitations in realism. This study analyzes the trends, collaboration, and impact of scientific production on SBL in medical education.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A descriptive bibliometric study was conducted using the Scopus database. Original articles published between 2019 and 2024 were selected. Indicators of productivity, impact, and collaboration were analyzed using SciVal, Excel, and the Bibliometrix package in RStudio.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 791 publications were identified. The most productive institutions were the University of Copenhagen, Harvard University, and the University of California at San Francisco. Canada showed the highest field-weighted citation impact. Scientific output increased progressively, particularly in Q1 and Q2 journals. The most frequent terms were “simulation training,” “clinical competence,” and “medical education,” with emerging terms such as “virtual reality.” The United States led international collaboration, followed by active networks in Europe and Brazil. The most prominent authors were Konge and Andersen, with recurrent publications in <em>BMC Medical Education</em> and <em>Simulation in Healthcare</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Scientific production on SBL in medical education shows a growing trend, with high international collaboration and the incorporation of emerging technologies, establishing it as a fundamental pedagogical strategy in modern medical training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 101080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181325000580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Simulation-based learning (SBL) has become a key tool in medical education by providing safe, realistic, and immersive experiences that strengthen students' clinical competencies. Despite its benefits, it faces challenges such as high costs and limitations in realism. This study analyzes the trends, collaboration, and impact of scientific production on SBL in medical education.

Materials and methods

A descriptive bibliometric study was conducted using the Scopus database. Original articles published between 2019 and 2024 were selected. Indicators of productivity, impact, and collaboration were analyzed using SciVal, Excel, and the Bibliometrix package in RStudio.

Results

A total of 791 publications were identified. The most productive institutions were the University of Copenhagen, Harvard University, and the University of California at San Francisco. Canada showed the highest field-weighted citation impact. Scientific output increased progressively, particularly in Q1 and Q2 journals. The most frequent terms were “simulation training,” “clinical competence,” and “medical education,” with emerging terms such as “virtual reality.” The United States led international collaboration, followed by active networks in Europe and Brazil. The most prominent authors were Konge and Andersen, with recurrent publications in BMC Medical Education and Simulation in Healthcare.

Conclusion

Scientific production on SBL in medical education shows a growing trend, with high international collaboration and the incorporation of emerging technologies, establishing it as a fundamental pedagogical strategy in modern medical training.
医学培训中基于模拟的学习对科学生产的趋势、协作和影响
基于模拟的学习(SBL)通过提供安全、真实和身临其境的体验来增强学生的临床能力,已成为医学教育的关键工具。尽管有好处,但它面临着诸如高成本和现实主义局限性等挑战。本研究分析医学教育中科学产出对SBL的趋势、协作和影响。材料与方法使用Scopus数据库进行描述性文献计量学研究。选取2019年至2024年间发表的原创文章。使用RStudio中的SciVal、Excel和Bibliometrix包分析了生产力、影响和协作指标。结果共收录文献791篇。最具生产力的机构是哥本哈根大学、哈佛大学和加州大学旧金山分校。加拿大显示出最高的领域加权引用影响。科学产出逐步增加,特别是在第一季度和第二季度的期刊。最常见的术语是“模拟训练”、“临床能力”和“医学教育”,以及“虚拟现实”等新兴术语。美国主导了国际合作,其次是欧洲和巴西的活跃网络。最著名的作者是Konge和Andersen,他们经常在BMC医学教育和医疗保健模拟上发表文章。结论医学教育中关于SBL的科学生产呈现出日益增长的趋势,国际间的高度合作和新兴技术的结合使其成为现代医学培训的基本教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信