Integration of data-driven T-spherical fuzzy mathematical models for evaluation of electric vehicles: Response to electric vehicle market demands

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Anirban Tarafdar , Azharuddin Shaikh , Dipayan Bhowmik , Pinki Majumder , Dragan Pamucar , Vladimir Simic , Uttam Kumar Bera
{"title":"Integration of data-driven T-spherical fuzzy mathematical models for evaluation of electric vehicles: Response to electric vehicle market demands","authors":"Anirban Tarafdar ,&nbsp;Azharuddin Shaikh ,&nbsp;Dipayan Bhowmik ,&nbsp;Pinki Majumder ,&nbsp;Dragan Pamucar ,&nbsp;Vladimir Simic ,&nbsp;Uttam Kumar Bera","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid growth of the electric vehicle (EV) market necessitates advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) frameworks capable of integrating diverse quantitative and qualitative factors under uncertainty. Traditional MCDM approaches often struggle to capture the complexity and imprecision inherent in EV evaluations, particularly in dynamic contexts like India. To address this gap, this study proposes the T-Spherical Fuzzy (T-SF) MARCOS and T-SF MOORA methods, which utilize T-Spherical Fuzzy Numbers (T-SFNs) to enhance decision precision. T-SFNs extend conventional fuzzy models by independently incorporating degrees of membership, non-membership, and hesitation, enabling a more granular and realistic modeling of expert judgments. In the methodological construction, numerical criteria (e.g., battery capacity, charging time) are directly incorporated, while qualitative criteria (e.g., safety, comfort) are initially evaluated by four domain experts through linguistic assessments, subsequently transformed into T-SFNs for integrated evaluation and accurate criteria weighting. The developed models are then employed to rank ten EV alternatives across 21 comprehensive technical and consumer-centric criteria. Comparative analysis shows that T-SF MARCOS and T-SF MOORA achieve superior ranking accuracy, with a high mutual Pearson correlation of 0.71, while traditional SF methods like SF-WSM and SF-WASPAS exhibit negative correlations of −0.43 and −0.42, respectively. Sensitivity analyses—covering variations in criteria weights and additional criteria integration—confirm the robustness and stability of the frameworks, with rank reversal rates remaining below 10 % across all scenarios. This study presents a technically resilient, uncertainty-aware evaluation framework, offering strategic insights for advancing consumer-centric EV development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 116008"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid growth of the electric vehicle (EV) market necessitates advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) frameworks capable of integrating diverse quantitative and qualitative factors under uncertainty. Traditional MCDM approaches often struggle to capture the complexity and imprecision inherent in EV evaluations, particularly in dynamic contexts like India. To address this gap, this study proposes the T-Spherical Fuzzy (T-SF) MARCOS and T-SF MOORA methods, which utilize T-Spherical Fuzzy Numbers (T-SFNs) to enhance decision precision. T-SFNs extend conventional fuzzy models by independently incorporating degrees of membership, non-membership, and hesitation, enabling a more granular and realistic modeling of expert judgments. In the methodological construction, numerical criteria (e.g., battery capacity, charging time) are directly incorporated, while qualitative criteria (e.g., safety, comfort) are initially evaluated by four domain experts through linguistic assessments, subsequently transformed into T-SFNs for integrated evaluation and accurate criteria weighting. The developed models are then employed to rank ten EV alternatives across 21 comprehensive technical and consumer-centric criteria. Comparative analysis shows that T-SF MARCOS and T-SF MOORA achieve superior ranking accuracy, with a high mutual Pearson correlation of 0.71, while traditional SF methods like SF-WSM and SF-WASPAS exhibit negative correlations of −0.43 and −0.42, respectively. Sensitivity analyses—covering variations in criteria weights and additional criteria integration—confirm the robustness and stability of the frameworks, with rank reversal rates remaining below 10 % across all scenarios. This study presents a technically resilient, uncertainty-aware evaluation framework, offering strategic insights for advancing consumer-centric EV development.
基于数据驱动的t球模糊数学模型的电动汽车评价:对电动汽车市场需求的响应
电动汽车市场的快速发展需要先进的多准则决策框架,能够在不确定的情况下整合各种定量和定性因素。传统的MCDM方法往往难以捕捉EV评估固有的复杂性和不精确性,特别是在印度这样的动态环境中。为了解决这一问题,本研究提出了t -球面模糊(T-SF) MARCOS和T-SF MOORA方法,利用t -球面模糊数(t - sfn)来提高决策精度。t - sfn通过独立地纳入隶属度、非隶属度和犹豫度来扩展传统的模糊模型,使专家判断的建模更加精细和真实。在方法构建中,直接纳入数值标准(如电池容量、充电时间),而定性标准(如安全性、舒适性)则由四位领域专家通过语言评估进行初步评估,随后转化为t - sfn进行综合评估和准确的标准加权。然后使用开发的模型在21项综合技术和以消费者为中心的标准中对10种电动汽车替代品进行排名。对比分析表明,T-SF MARCOS和T-SF MOORA的排序精度较高,Pearson相关系数为0.71,而传统的顺势分类方法如SF- wsm和SF- waspas的相关系数分别为- 0.43和- 0.42。敏感性分析——包括标准权重的变化和附加标准的整合——证实了框架的稳健性和稳定性,在所有情景中排名反转率保持在10%以下。本研究提出了一个具有技术弹性、不确定性意识的评估框架,为推进以消费者为中心的电动汽车发展提供了战略见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信