{"title":"Performance evaluation of antimicrobial blue light for inactivating multidrug-resistant bacteria on common fabric materials","authors":"Hanlin Liu , Huihui Zhang , Alvin C.K. Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fomite transmission of multidrug-resistant bacteria in hospitals is a serious public health issue. Antimicrobial blue light (aBL) holds great promise in reducing the incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) while being safe for use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study evaluated the influence of surface materials on the bactericidal performance of aBL against three multidrug-resistant bacteria: <em>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</em>, <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em>, and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa.</em> Six microbial-contaminated surfaces were studied: glass, cotton, towel, blanket, sofa and bedsheet.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the same dose of 3.3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, aBL treatment for bedsheets resulted in a 3.0 times higher log reduction in colony forming counts (CFUs) than sofa material. This significant difference may be partly due to fabric porosity and variations in light penetration. Additionally, a positive linear relationship between reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and microbial reduction was established, indicating that higher intracellular ROS levels corresponded linearly to more effective bactericidal performance by aBL. We also systematically compared the penetration and bactericidal performance of aBL with 254 nm Ultraviolet C (UVC) and 222 nm Far-UVC for testing double-layer cotton samples. Both UVC and Far-UVC outperformed aBL treatment for single-layer fabrics. Nonetheless, due to the very low light penetration of shorter wavelengths, the bactericidal efficiency of UVC and Far-UVC was substantially reduced for the bottom-layer sample. For aBL, the difference in bactericidal efficiency data between top-layer and bottom-layer was approximately 10 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>aBL exhibited varying bactericidal efficacy across different surfaces, with the highest microbial reduction observed on bedsheet and the lowest reduction on sofa fabric. Furthermore, aBL demonstrated superior bactericidal performance against drug-resistant bacteria on multi-layer fabrics compared to Far-UVC and UVC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 10","pages":"Article 102846"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034125001959","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fomite transmission of multidrug-resistant bacteria in hospitals is a serious public health issue. Antimicrobial blue light (aBL) holds great promise in reducing the incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) while being safe for use.
Methods
This study evaluated the influence of surface materials on the bactericidal performance of aBL against three multidrug-resistant bacteria: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Six microbial-contaminated surfaces were studied: glass, cotton, towel, blanket, sofa and bedsheet.
Results
At the same dose of 3.3 J/cm2, aBL treatment for bedsheets resulted in a 3.0 times higher log reduction in colony forming counts (CFUs) than sofa material. This significant difference may be partly due to fabric porosity and variations in light penetration. Additionally, a positive linear relationship between reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and microbial reduction was established, indicating that higher intracellular ROS levels corresponded linearly to more effective bactericidal performance by aBL. We also systematically compared the penetration and bactericidal performance of aBL with 254 nm Ultraviolet C (UVC) and 222 nm Far-UVC for testing double-layer cotton samples. Both UVC and Far-UVC outperformed aBL treatment for single-layer fabrics. Nonetheless, due to the very low light penetration of shorter wavelengths, the bactericidal efficiency of UVC and Far-UVC was substantially reduced for the bottom-layer sample. For aBL, the difference in bactericidal efficiency data between top-layer and bottom-layer was approximately 10 %.
Conclusion
aBL exhibited varying bactericidal efficacy across different surfaces, with the highest microbial reduction observed on bedsheet and the lowest reduction on sofa fabric. Furthermore, aBL demonstrated superior bactericidal performance against drug-resistant bacteria on multi-layer fabrics compared to Far-UVC and UVC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.