Hee Jeong Lee , William D. Kim , Kyung Eun Ha , Hyun-Jung Lee , Dae-Young Kim , Kyu-Yong Ko , Jiwon Seo , Hasung Kim , Chi Young Shim , Geu-Ru Hong , Jong-Won Ha , Ji-won Hwang , Iksung Cho
{"title":"Procedural and clinical risk factors of infective endocarditis – A nationwide case-control study in South Korea","authors":"Hee Jeong Lee , William D. Kim , Kyung Eun Ha , Hyun-Jung Lee , Dae-Young Kim , Kyu-Yong Ko , Jiwon Seo , Hasung Kim , Chi Young Shim , Geu-Ru Hong , Jong-Won Ha , Ji-won Hwang , Iksung Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infective endocarditis (IE) causes high mortality and morbidity, posing a significant burden on healthcare systems. Although the incidence of IE is rising globally, its risk factors, particularly procedure-related risks, remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and procedural risk factors associated with IE using nationwide data from South Korea.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service between 2003 and 2018. A total of 8487 patients with IE and 33,535 matched controls based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were included. Procedural risk factors were categorized as dental, gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genitourinary, with analysis periods of 90 and 60 days for dental and other procedures, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations, with statistical significance set at <em>P</em> < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Traditional risk factors including dialysis, immunosuppression, congenital heart disease, and valvular disease were significantly associated with IE. Additionally, invasive procedures, such as intravenous catheter insertion (odds ratio [OR], 18.94) and respiratory (OR, 4.05), gastrointestinal (OR, 3.09), and genitourinary procedures (OR, 3.97), were strongly associated with an increased risk of IE (all <em>P</em> < 0.001). Dental procedures without antibiotic prophylaxis were also associated with a higher risk of IE (OR, 1.19; <em>P</em> = 0.001), whereas those with prophylaxis were not (OR, 1.07; <em>P</em> = 0.256).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both clinical factors and procedural interventions significantly contributed to the risk of IE. Our findings support the need for expanded preventive strategies, particularly considering nondental invasive procedures and high-risk patient groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 10","pages":"Article 102876"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034125002254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Infective endocarditis (IE) causes high mortality and morbidity, posing a significant burden on healthcare systems. Although the incidence of IE is rising globally, its risk factors, particularly procedure-related risks, remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and procedural risk factors associated with IE using nationwide data from South Korea.
Methods
We analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service between 2003 and 2018. A total of 8487 patients with IE and 33,535 matched controls based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were included. Procedural risk factors were categorized as dental, gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genitourinary, with analysis periods of 90 and 60 days for dental and other procedures, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.
Results
Traditional risk factors including dialysis, immunosuppression, congenital heart disease, and valvular disease were significantly associated with IE. Additionally, invasive procedures, such as intravenous catheter insertion (odds ratio [OR], 18.94) and respiratory (OR, 4.05), gastrointestinal (OR, 3.09), and genitourinary procedures (OR, 3.97), were strongly associated with an increased risk of IE (all P < 0.001). Dental procedures without antibiotic prophylaxis were also associated with a higher risk of IE (OR, 1.19; P = 0.001), whereas those with prophylaxis were not (OR, 1.07; P = 0.256).
Conclusions
Both clinical factors and procedural interventions significantly contributed to the risk of IE. Our findings support the need for expanded preventive strategies, particularly considering nondental invasive procedures and high-risk patient groups.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.