Crowd safety assessment for flood evacuation in subway platform tunnels

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Shuchao Cao , Luhan Ma , Yiping Zeng , Yan Wang , Peng Wang , Li Xu
{"title":"Crowd safety assessment for flood evacuation in subway platform tunnels","authors":"Shuchao Cao ,&nbsp;Luhan Ma ,&nbsp;Yiping Zeng ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Peng Wang ,&nbsp;Li Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flood disasters occur frequently worldwide, causing a large number of casualties and property damage. Urban subway stations are one of the most vulnerable places to flooding. Therefore, to evaluate the flood hazard for passengers in subway stations, an evacuation safety assessment method is proposed in this paper. The flood inundation process is firstly simulated, and the flood depth and flow velocity in subway stations are obtained based on the hydrodynamic model. Secondly, a crowd evacuation model considering the dynamic flood impacts is established, and the simulation results are validated through the qualitative and quantitative methods. Thirdly, the ASET is calculated based on the critical instability status of pedestrians in floods, and the RSET is obtained based on the simulated evacuation time. Finally, the evacuation safety index (ESI), namely the difference between ASET and RSET, is proposed to accurately identify the danger and quantitatively assess the crowd safety at both micro and macro levels in flood scenarios. The results indicate that the staircase areas are more dangerous due to the large water speed, especially under the large inlet flow and evacuee number. Moreover, with the increase of preparation time, the ASET significantly decreases while the RSET increases notably, making it difficult for the crowd to evacuate safely. The study provides useful insights for flood hazard assessment in subway stations, which can help the emergency department to make timely decisions and formulate evacuation plans to ensure the safety of passengers in sudden flood events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 106848"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825004869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flood disasters occur frequently worldwide, causing a large number of casualties and property damage. Urban subway stations are one of the most vulnerable places to flooding. Therefore, to evaluate the flood hazard for passengers in subway stations, an evacuation safety assessment method is proposed in this paper. The flood inundation process is firstly simulated, and the flood depth and flow velocity in subway stations are obtained based on the hydrodynamic model. Secondly, a crowd evacuation model considering the dynamic flood impacts is established, and the simulation results are validated through the qualitative and quantitative methods. Thirdly, the ASET is calculated based on the critical instability status of pedestrians in floods, and the RSET is obtained based on the simulated evacuation time. Finally, the evacuation safety index (ESI), namely the difference between ASET and RSET, is proposed to accurately identify the danger and quantitatively assess the crowd safety at both micro and macro levels in flood scenarios. The results indicate that the staircase areas are more dangerous due to the large water speed, especially under the large inlet flow and evacuee number. Moreover, with the increase of preparation time, the ASET significantly decreases while the RSET increases notably, making it difficult for the crowd to evacuate safely. The study provides useful insights for flood hazard assessment in subway stations, which can help the emergency department to make timely decisions and formulate evacuation plans to ensure the safety of passengers in sudden flood events.
地铁站台隧道洪水疏散人群安全评价
洪水灾害在世界范围内频繁发生,造成大量人员伤亡和财产损失。城市地铁站是最容易受到洪水侵袭的地方之一。为此,本文提出了一种地铁车站疏散安全评价方法,以评价车站内乘客的洪水危害。首先对洪水淹没过程进行了模拟,基于水动力模型得到了地铁车站的洪水深度和流速。其次,建立了考虑洪水动态影响的人群疏散模型,并通过定性和定量方法对仿真结果进行了验证。第三,根据行人在洪水中的临界不稳定状态计算ASET,并根据模拟疏散时间得到RSET。最后,提出疏散安全指数(ESI),即疏散安全指数(ASET)与疏散安全指数(RSET)的差值,从微观和宏观两个层面准确识别洪水情景下的危险,定量评估人群安全。结果表明,楼梯区域由于水流速度大,特别是在入口流量大、疏散人数大的情况下,危险更大。而且,随着准备时间的增加,ASET显著降低,而RSET显著增加,使得人群难以安全疏散。该研究为地铁车站的洪水灾害评估提供了有益的见解,可以帮助应急部门在突发洪水事件中及时做出决策并制定疏散计划,以确保乘客的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信