Continuous and Noninvasive Total Blood Hemoglobin Measurement Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectrometry.

Stefan F van Wonderen,Andres Aguirre,Paul Benni,Rokus E C van den Dool,Juan Pedro Macias Pingarron,Gumersindo Javier Solares,Feras Hatib,Denise P Veelo,Alexander P J Vlaar,Zhongping Jian
{"title":"Continuous and Noninvasive Total Blood Hemoglobin Measurement Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectrometry.","authors":"Stefan F van Wonderen,Andres Aguirre,Paul Benni,Rokus E C van den Dool,Juan Pedro Macias Pingarron,Gumersindo Javier Solares,Feras Hatib,Denise P Veelo,Alexander P J Vlaar,Zhongping Jian","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nContinuous measurement of total hemoglobin (tHb) can be of great clinical value during surgery, visualizing tHb trends and guiding blood transfusion practices. Devices such as those pulse oximetry-based have been available and studied over the past decade with varying results on their accuracy. We recently developed a first-of-its-kind near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) based algorithm to measure tHb continuously and noninvasively. This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the NIRS based tHb algorithm using a cerebral oximetry sensor.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe performed a post hoc retrospective analysis of data collected during cardiac surgery from 3 clinical sites. Both NIRS data and blood gas tHb data were collected. Then the NIRS data was postprocessed through the NIRS based tHb algorithm to generate continuous measurement of tHb. Comparison between the 2 tHb measurements was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), 4-quadrant concordance, and error-grid analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOne hundred and eighty-nine (189) patients were included in the analysis. The bias (or mean difference) and precision (or 1 standard deviation of the difference) (95% confidence interval) are 0.08 (0.02-0.19) g/dL and 1.01 (0.93-1.09) g/dL, respectively. The limits of agreement were -1.90 and 2.06 g/dL. The MAE is 0.79 (0.69-0.91) g/dL, the RMSE is 1.12 (0.94-1.30 g/dL), and the concordance is 86.1 (79.8-92.1) %. The error-grid analysis demonstrated that the majority (84%) of the measurements are in the green zone and 0% in the red zone.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe exploratory study shows that the NIRS based tHb provided an accurate measurement of tHb in cardiac surgery patients. Further research may be needed to evaluate its accuracy and implementation in other clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Continuous measurement of total hemoglobin (tHb) can be of great clinical value during surgery, visualizing tHb trends and guiding blood transfusion practices. Devices such as those pulse oximetry-based have been available and studied over the past decade with varying results on their accuracy. We recently developed a first-of-its-kind near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) based algorithm to measure tHb continuously and noninvasively. This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the NIRS based tHb algorithm using a cerebral oximetry sensor. METHODS We performed a post hoc retrospective analysis of data collected during cardiac surgery from 3 clinical sites. Both NIRS data and blood gas tHb data were collected. Then the NIRS data was postprocessed through the NIRS based tHb algorithm to generate continuous measurement of tHb. Comparison between the 2 tHb measurements was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), 4-quadrant concordance, and error-grid analysis. RESULTS One hundred and eighty-nine (189) patients were included in the analysis. The bias (or mean difference) and precision (or 1 standard deviation of the difference) (95% confidence interval) are 0.08 (0.02-0.19) g/dL and 1.01 (0.93-1.09) g/dL, respectively. The limits of agreement were -1.90 and 2.06 g/dL. The MAE is 0.79 (0.69-0.91) g/dL, the RMSE is 1.12 (0.94-1.30 g/dL), and the concordance is 86.1 (79.8-92.1) %. The error-grid analysis demonstrated that the majority (84%) of the measurements are in the green zone and 0% in the red zone. CONCLUSIONS The exploratory study shows that the NIRS based tHb provided an accurate measurement of tHb in cardiac surgery patients. Further research may be needed to evaluate its accuracy and implementation in other clinical settings.
用近红外反射光谱法连续无创测定总血红蛋白。
背景:连续测量总血红蛋白(tHb)在外科手术中具有重要的临床价值,可以可视化tHb趋势并指导输血实践。在过去的十年里,诸如基于脉搏血氧计的设备已经可用,并且在其准确性方面得到了不同的结果。我们最近开发了一种基于近红外反射光谱(NIRS)的算法,可以连续无创地测量tHb。本研究采用脑氧饱和度传感器评估基于近红外光谱的tHb算法的性能。方法:我们对3个临床地点心脏手术期间收集的数据进行回顾性分析。采集近红外光谱数据和血气tHb数据。然后通过基于近红外光谱的tHb算法对近红外光谱数据进行后处理,生成连续的tHb测量值。采用Bland-Altman分析、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、四象限一致性和误差网格分析对2个tHb测量值进行比较。结果189例患者纳入分析。偏差(或平均差值)和精度(或差值的1个标准差)(95%置信区间)分别为0.08 (0.02-0.19)g/dL和1.01 (0.93-1.09)g/dL。一致性限分别为-1.90和2.06 g/dL。MAE为0.79 (0.69 ~ 0.91)g/dL, RMSE为1.12 (0.94 ~ 1.30)g/dL,一致性为86.1(79.8 ~ 92.1)%。误差网格分析表明,大多数(84%)的测量值在绿色区域,0%在红色区域。结论探索性研究表明,基于近红外光谱的tHb可以准确测量心脏手术患者的tHb。可能需要进一步的研究来评估其准确性和在其他临床环境中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信